Comparison between Two Types of Current Control Techniques Applied to Shunt Active Power Filters and Development of a Novel Fuzzy Logic Controller to Improve SAPF Performance

In this paper two types of current control techniques, namely, direct and indirect current control techniques are employed to a three phase shunt active power filter for the compensation of the harmonics in the current caused by the non-linear loads. The difference between these two types of current control technique is in the number of current sensors used. In direct current control technique both load and filter currents are sensed whereas indirect current control technique is based up on sensing source side current only. For both the schemes a simple PI-controller is used to obtain reference current templates. Also, a novel fuzzy logic based controller is developed to replace the conventional PIcontroller. The advantages of fuzzy controllers over conventional controllers are that they do not require an accurate mathematical model, they can work with imprecise inputs, can handle non-linearity and they are more robust. Various simulations are presented for direct and indirect current control techniques along with PI-controller and Fuzzy Logic Controller under both steady state and transient conditions. Keywords— shunt active power filter, harmonics, direct current control technique, indirect current control technique, fuzzy logic controller, dc-link voltage List of Symbols isa ∗ , isb ∗ , isc ∗ Three phase reference source currents is t , il t , if(t) Instantaneous value of source, load and filter current vs t ,Vm(t) Instantaneous and peak value of source voltage Rs , Ls Source resistance and inductance Rf , Lf Filter resistance and inductance isp , isl Peak value of reference current and loss current Vdc ,Vdcref Actual and reference value of DC capacitor voltage pl(t) Instantaneous load power pf t ,pr t ,ph (t) Instantaneous fundamental(real), reactive and harmonic power cosφ1 Displacement factor

[1]  J. Dixon,et al.  DC link fuzzy control for an active power filter, sensing the line current only , 1997, PESC97. Record 28th Annual IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference. Formerly Power Conditioning Specialists Conference 1970-71. Power Processing and Electronic Specialists Conference 1972.

[2]  S. D. Round,et al.  The steady-state performance of a controlled current active filter , 1993 .

[3]  Hirofumi Akagi,et al.  Trends in active power line conditioners , 1992, Proceedings of the 1992 International Conference on Industrial Electronics, Control, Instrumentation, and Automation.

[4]  Baolin Zhang,et al.  Current controller for active power filter based on optimal voltage space vector , 2001 .

[5]  G. K. Dubey,et al.  An instantaneous reactive volt-ampere compensator and harmonic suppressor system , 1999 .

[6]  Hirofumi Akagi,et al.  Active Harmonic Filters , 2005, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[7]  Hirofumi Akagi,et al.  New trends in active filters for power conditioning , 1996 .

[8]  N. Saad,et al.  PLC-based fuzzy logic controller for induction-motor drive with constant V/Hz ratio , 2007, 2007 International Conference on Intelligent and Advanced Systems.

[9]  T. Narasa Reddy,et al.  Fuzzy Logic Controlled Shunt Active Power Filter for Mitigation of Harmonics with Different Membership Functions , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Control, and Telecommunication Technologies.

[10]  A.N. Jog,et al.  An Adaptive Hysteresis Band Current Controlled Shunt Active Power Filter , 2007, 2007 Compatibility in Power Electronics.

[11]  Kamal Al-Haddad,et al.  A review of active filters for power quality improvement , 1999, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron..