Modelling and simulation of human behavioural and emotional dynamics during emergencies: a review of the state-of-the-art

Research works on human behaviour modelling and simulation continue to increase in recent years. Indeed, emotion and personality are among the most important human characteristics that influence behaviour. Particularly, during emergencies, emotional dynamics have a major influence on individual and collective behaviours. In this paper, we aim to provide an integrated review on this challenging and multidisciplinary field. We give first an overview of computational models of emotions and personalities. Then, we expose and discuss emotional and behavioural models. An emphasis is given to the role of internal and external emotional dynamics in the production of realistic behaviours during emergencies. Internal emotional dynamics affect cognitive processes at an individual level. However, external emotional dynamics, studied through phenomena such as empathy or emotional contagion, are essential to simulate collective emotional dynamics.

[1]  Michael Lees,et al.  HumDPM: A Decision Process Model for Modeling Human-Like Behaviors in Time-Critical and Uncertain Situations , 2011, Trans. Comput. Sci..

[2]  Ana Paiva,et al.  A Generic Emotional Contagion Computational Model , 2011, ACII.

[3]  El Jed Mehdi Modelling character emotion in an interactive virtual environment , 2007 .

[4]  Magalie Ochs,et al.  Simulation of the Dynamics of Nonplayer Characters' Emotions and Social Relations in Games , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games.

[5]  Élisabeth Pacherie L'empathie et ses degrés , 2004 .

[6]  P. Costa,et al.  Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  Gary Klein,et al.  Sources of Power: How People Make Decisions , 2017 .

[8]  Helbing,et al.  Social force model for pedestrian dynamics. , 1995, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[9]  Alexis Drogoul,et al.  Agent-based interaction analysis of consumer behavior , 2002, AAMAS '02.

[10]  N. Badler,et al.  Crowd simulation incorporating agent psychological models, roles and communication , 2005 .

[11]  Milind Tambe,et al.  Empirical Evaluation of Computational Emotional Contagion Models , 2011, IVA.

[12]  Domitile Lourdeaux,et al.  Empathy and Placebo for Autonomous Agents , 2010, 2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology.

[13]  Stacy Marsella,et al.  A domain-independent framework for modeling emotion , 2004, Cognitive Systems Research.

[14]  Benoit Gaudou,et al.  Simulation of the Emotion Dynamics in a Group of Agents in an Evacuation Situation , 2010, PRIMA.

[15]  K. Scherer Psychological models of emotion. , 2000 .

[16]  A. Damasio The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex. , 1996, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[17]  Ana Paiva,et al.  “I can feel it too!”: Emergent empathic reactions between synthetic characters , 2009, 2009 3rd International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction and Workshops.

[18]  R. Lazarus Emotion and Adaptation , 1991 .

[19]  Tibor Bosse,et al.  A Multi-agent Model for Emotion Contagion Spirals Integrated within a Supporting Ambient Agent Model , 2009, PRIMA.

[20]  Ana Paiva,et al.  A Game Prototype with Emotional Contagion , 2011, ACII.

[21]  R. Doherty The Emotional Contagion Scale: A Measure of Individual Differences , 1997 .

[22]  H. Simon,et al.  Bounded rationality in social science: Today and tomorrow , 2000 .

[23]  Demetri Terzopoulos,et al.  Autonomous pedestrians , 2005, SCA '05.

[24]  K. Scherer Appraisal considered as a process of multilevel sequential checking. , 2001 .

[25]  Daniel Thalmann,et al.  An action selection process to simulate the human behavior in virtual humans with real personality , 2011, The Visual Computer.

[26]  Magnenat-ThalmannNadia,et al.  Intelligent virtual humans with autonomy and personality , 2007 .

[27]  K. Ochsner,et al.  The neuroscience of empathy: progress, pitfalls and promise , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  Emiliano Lorini,et al.  Computational Modeling of Emotion: Toward Improving the Inter- and Intradisciplinary Exchange , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing.

[29]  Andrew Ortony,et al.  The Cognitive Structure of Emotions , 1988 .

[30]  Nadia Magnenat-Thalmann,et al.  Intelligent virtual humans with autonomy and personality: State-of-the-art , 2007, Intell. Decis. Technol..

[31]  A. Damasio Descartes’ Error. Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. New York (Grosset/Putnam) 1994. , 1994 .

[32]  Caro Lucas,et al.  A general computational recognition primed decision model with multi-agent rescue simulation benchmark , 2012, Inf. Sci..

[33]  Nadia Magnenat-Thalmann,et al.  A Model for Personality and Emotion Simulation , 2003, KES.

[34]  Tuncer Ören,et al.  Design and implementation of GEmA: A generic emotional agent , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[35]  T. Singer,et al.  The Social Neuroscience of Empathy , 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[36]  G. Schoenewolf,et al.  Emotional contagion: Behavioral induction in individuals and groups. , 1990 .

[37]  T. Singer,et al.  The empathic brain: how, when and why? , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[38]  Alexia Zoumpoulaki,et al.  A Multi-agent Simulation Framework for Emergency Evacuations Incorporating Personality and Emotions , 2010, SETN.

[39]  Mihai Horia Zaharia,et al.  Agent-based simulation of crowd evacuation behavior , 2009 .

[40]  Bo Ren,et al.  Application of multi-resolution modelling in emergency evacuation simulation , 2012, Int. J. Simul. Process. Model..

[41]  A. Damasio Descartes' error: emotion, reason, and the human brain. avon books , 1994 .

[42]  Michel C. A. Klein,et al.  Modelling collective decision making in groups and crowds: Integrating social contagion and interacting emotions, beliefs and intentions , 2013, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[43]  J. Russell,et al.  Evidence for a three-factor theory of emotions , 1977 .

[44]  Michael Lees,et al.  A Computational Model of Emotions for Agent-Based Crowds in Serious Games , 2011, 2011 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology.

[45]  G. Keith Still Review of pedestrian and evacuation simulations , 2007, Int. J. Crit. Infrastructures.

[46]  Christopher Nemeth,et al.  The Naturalistic Decision Making Perspective , 2011 .

[47]  Stefan Kopp,et al.  Connecting feelings and thoughts - modeling the interaction of emotion and cognition in embodied agents , 2006 .

[48]  Milind Tambe,et al.  ESCAPES: evacuation simulation with children, authorities, parents, emotions, and social comparison , 2011, AAMAS.

[49]  Bartel Van de Walle,et al.  Decision support for emergency situations , 2008, Inf. Syst. E Bus. Manag..

[50]  Florent Coudret,et al.  Modélisation du comportement humain pour la simulation d’évacuation de bâtiment en feu , 2012 .

[51]  Michel C. A. Klein,et al.  Agent-Based Modelling of Social Emotional Decision Making in Emergency Situations , 2013 .

[52]  Aaron Sloman,et al.  Why Robots Will Have Emotions , 1981, IJCAI.

[53]  E R Galea,et al.  Computer modelling of human behaviour in aircraft fire accidents. , 1996, Toxicology.

[54]  Ana Paiva,et al.  A model for emotional contagion based on the emotional contagion scale , 2009, 2009 3rd International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction and Workshops.