Key features of information management systems (IMSs) for automation in university libraries: a view point of information professionals in Pakistan

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to investigate the key features of information management systems (IMSs) for automation in university libraries. This study also highlights the use of library information management systems in university libraries and the satisfaction of university librarians in using various IMS.Design/methodology/approachThis study is quantitative in nature. A survey research method has been applied to achieve the research objectives. Purposive sampling has been used to select the targeted population which consisted of 157 librarians working in university libraries. Data were collected through a web-based questionnaire. Descriptive and inferential statistics were applied to analyze the collected data by using SPSS software.FindingsFree and open source software are widely used in university libraries to manage the bibliographic information of library material. KOHA is the most used software for library automation in university libraries of Pakistan. The key features of library information management system (IMS) include reliability and security of the software, user-friendly interface, advance searching options, use of library standards (MARC, Uni MARC, RDA), online upgradation, technical support of developing company, shared cataloging, multilingual features of software, etc (See Figure 4). The study recommends that the above-mentioned features must be considered by university librarians when selecting any software for library automation. Results showed that apart from the use of KOHA software, there are also some other software which are being used for library automation in university libraries of Pakistan. These systems include; Virtua, Library Management System (LMS), and Library Information Management Systems (LIMSs).Practical implicationsThis study has practical implications for university librarians in Pakistan as well as in other countries. Librarians can use the results of this study as a blueprint before selecting any information management system to automate the library record.Originality/valueThis study identifies the core features of IMS for automation in libraries. These features have been recommended by informational professionals who have been working in automated libraries and possess adequate professional experience in using library automation software.

[1]  Narasimhamurthi Natarjan,et al.  A Resource for Teaching Internet Access , 1995 .

[2]  Tristan Müller,et al.  How to choose a free and open source integrated library system , 2011, OCLC Syst. Serv..

[3]  Ian Walls.  Migrating from Innovative Interfaces' Millennium to Koha: The NYU Health Sciences Libraries' experiences , 2011, OCLC Syst. Serv..

[4]  Farzana Shafique,et al.  Librarians' opinions about library software: a survey of libraries in Lahore , 2007, Electron. Libr..

[5]  Khalid Mahmood.  The development of computerised library services in Pakistan , 1999 .

[6]  Nur Ahammad.  Implementing the Koha integrated library system at the Independent University, Bangladesh: A practical experience , 2014, Electron. Libr..

[7]  Shabana Tabusum,et al.  Impact of Library Automation in the Development Era , 2013 .

[8]  Ngozi P. Osuchukwu,et al.  ISSUES IN SELECTING APPROPRIATE SOFTWARE FOR AUTOMATION AND MANAGEMENT OF ACADEMIC LIBRARIES IN NIGERIA , 2014 .

[9]  Jianhang Wang.  Massive information management system of digital library based on deep learning algorithm in the background of big data , 2020 .

[10]  Muhammad Ijaz Mairaj,et al.  Librarians' perceptions about adoption and uses of the Koha integrated library software in Punjab, Pakistan , 2019, Electron. Libr..

[11]  Srinivasa Ragavan.  Implementation of Automated Library Management System in the School of Chemistry Bharathidasan University using Koha Open Source Software , 2010 .

[12]  John Helling.  Cutting the proprietary cord , 2010 .

[13]  S. Ravikumar,et al.  Implementation and integration of radio-frequency identification system: a practical approach , 2019 .

[14]  Airen Adetimirin,et al.  Selection and use of KOHA software in two private Nigerian universities , 2013 .

[15]  M. Jabeen,et al.  Library professional’s opinion about open source software adoption: Status, problems and measures used in libraries of Beijing, China , 2018 .

[16]  Mini G. Pillai,et al.  Automation of University Libraries in Kerala: Status, Problems and Prospects. , 2005 .

[17]  Namjoo Choi,et al.  A comparison between select open source and proprietary integrated library systems , 2013, Libr. Hi Tech.

[18]  Muhammad Ijaz Mairaj,et al.  Applications of information and communication technologies in libraries in Pakistan. , 2012, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[19]  Shana R. Ponelis,et al.  Diffusion of open source integrated library systems in academic libraries in Africa , 2018, Library Management.

[20]  N. M. Malwad.  Selection Criteria for Library Automation Software , 1995 .

[21]  Kanwal Ameen,et al.  Professional activities, needed competencies and training needs of medical librarians in Pakistan , 2011, Educ. Inf..

[22]  Ashish Srivastava,et al.  Online Library Management System , 2012 .

[23]  Diljit Singh,et al.  Status of information technology applications in Pakistani libraries , 2009, Electron. Libr..

[24]  Linda G. Bills.  Technical services and integrated library systems , 2000 .

[25]  Ag Nkhoma-Wamunza.  Library Automation: The Role and Significance of Library Automation Plans , 2005 .

[26]  Beatrice Adera Amollo.  Feasibility of adaptation of open source ILS for libraries in Kenya: a practical evaluation , 2013, Electron. Libr..

[27]  Muhammad Rafiq,et al.  Journey from Library Management System (LMS) to KOHA by Government College University Libraries, Lahore , 2016 .

[28]  Ata ur Rehman,et al.  Free and Open Source Software Movement in LIS Profession in Pakistan , 2012 .

[29]  Victor N. Nwachukwu,et al.  Library automation and use of open source software to maximize library effectivenss , 2014 .

[30]  Saima Qutab,et al.  From LAMP to Koha: case study of the Pakistan legislative assembly libraries , 2012, Program.

[31]  Adetoun A. Oyelude.  Emerging technologies for libraries archives and museums: trends and projections , 2019 .

[32]  T. K. Gireesh Kumar,et al.  Perceptions of LIS Professionals on open source integrated library system and adoptability of Koha over LibSys in India , 2015 .

[33]  Shalini R. Lihitkar,et al.  E-learning programmes in library and information science: worldwide initiatives and challenges for India , 2013 .

[34]  Amrutraj Ravi Benahal.  Self-reliance of the Koha acquisition module for managing procurement of printed books: An academic library perspective , 2018, Electron. Libr..

[35]  Prabhat Singh Rajput,et al.  Status of automation in special libraries and information centers of Gwalior: a survey , 2006 .

[36]  Farzana Shafique,et al.  Integrated Library Software: A Survey of Lahore , 2008 .