The effect of a motivational manipulation in reducing fatigue-related impairments in simulated driving performance was examined. Drivers performed both a fatiguing drive and a control drive. The motivational manipulation, a driving skill assessment instruction, appeared in early and late stages of both drives. Lateral control of the vehicle was assessed on straight and curved road sections early and late during the assessment instruction in both drives. The results indicate that the instruction only affected straight-road driving in the later part of both drives. During the later part of the control drive, the instruction produced a performance improvement only while the instruction was actually presented. In the fatigue drive, performance continued to improve even after cessation of the instruction, converging to the level of control drive performance. Fatigued drivers remain capable of increasing task effort in response to a motivating instruction, but fatigue may impair the ability to synchronize effort with changing task demands.
[1]
P A Desmond,et al.
Implications of task-induced fatigue effects for in-vehicle countermeasures to driver fatigue.
,
1997,
Accident; analysis and prevention.
[2]
Nick McDonald,et al.
Fatigue, safety, and the truck driver
,
1984
.
[3]
Dylan M. Jones,et al.
Refining the measurement of mood: The UWIST Mood Adjective Checklist
,
1990
.
[4]
S. Hart,et al.
Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research
,
1988
.
[5]
Gerald Matthews,et al.
TASK-INDUCED FATIGUE EFFECTS ON SIMULATED DRIVING PERFORMANCE
,
1998
.
[6]
A. Craig,et al.
11 – Symptoms of Acute and Chronic Fatigue
,
1992
.
[7]
Irwin G. Sarason,et al.
Cognitive interference: Situational determinants and traitlike characteristics.
,
1986
.
[8]
Gerald Matthews,et al.
Stress as a factor in the design of in-car driving enhancement systems
,
1995
.