Your mind wanders weakly, your mind wanders deeply: Objective measures reveal mindless reading at different levels

When the mind wanders, attention turns away from the external environment and cognitive processing is decoupled from perceptual information. Mind wandering is usually treated as a dichotomy (dichotomy-hypothesis), and is often measured using self-reports. Here, we propose the levels of inattention hypothesis, which postulates attentional decoupling to graded degrees at different hierarchical levels of cognitive processing. To measure graded levels of attentional decoupling during reading we introduce the sustained attention to stimulus task (SAST), which is based on psychophysics of error detection. Under experimental conditions likely to induce mind wandering, we found that subjects were less likely to notice errors that required high-level processing for their detection as opposed to errors that only required low-level processing. Eye tracking revealed that before errors were overlooked influences of high- and low-level linguistic variables on eye fixations were reduced in a graded fashion, indicating episodes of mindless reading at weak and deep levels. Individual fixation durations predicted overlooking of lexical errors 5s before they occurred. Our findings support the levels of inattention hypothesis and suggest that different levels of mindless reading can be measured behaviorally in the SAST. Using eye tracking to detect mind wandering online represents a promising approach for the development of new techniques to study mind wandering and to ameliorate its negative consequences.

[1]  Milena Rabovsky,et al.  Is lexical access autonomous? Evidence from combining overlapping tasks with recording event-related brain potentials , 2008, Brain Research.

[2]  Julie D. Golomb,et al.  A taxonomy of external and internal attention. , 2011, Annual review of psychology.

[3]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  Tracking the mind during reading: the influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[4]  T. Wickens Elementary Signal Detection Theory , 2001 .

[5]  Jonathan S. A. Carriere,et al.  Failures of sustained attention in life, lab, and brain: Ecological validity of the SART , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[6]  Daniel Smilek,et al.  Consistency of sustained attention across modalities: comparing visual and auditory versions of the SART. , 2012, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[7]  Katherine A. Johnson,et al.  Response variability in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: evidence for neuropsychological heterogeneity. , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  J. Smallwood,et al.  When attention matters: The curious incident of the wandering mind , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[9]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Meta-awareness, perceptual decoupling and the wandering mind , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  Jonathan Smallwood,et al.  Catching the mind in flight: Using behavioral indices to detect mindless reading in real time , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[11]  Adrian Staub,et al.  Word recognition and syntactic attachment in reading: evidence for a staged architecture. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[12]  M. Masson,et al.  A linear mixed model analysis of masked repetition priming , 2010 .

[13]  J. Smallwood,et al.  Task unrelated thought whilst encoding information , 2003, Consciousness and Cognition.

[14]  M. Gill,et al.  The Cognitive Genetics of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): Sustained attention as a Candidate Phenotype , 2006, Cortex.

[15]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Lost in the Sauce , 2009, Psychological science.

[16]  Brian S. Schnitzer,et al.  Eye movements during multiple readings of the same text , 2006, Vision Research.

[17]  K. Rayner The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  Mechanisms and models of se-lective attention , 1995 .

[19]  Karl G. D. Bailey,et al.  Good-Enough Representations in Language Comprehension , 2002 .

[20]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Uncovering the Neural Signature of Lapsing Attention: Electrophysiological Signals Predict Errors up to 20 s before They Occur , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  K. Rayner,et al.  Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  M. Kane,et al.  Tracking the train of thought from the laboratory into everyday life: An experience-sampling study of mind wandering across controlled and ecological contexts , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[23]  Jonathan S. A. Carriere,et al.  Challenge and error: Critical events and attention-related errors , 2011, Cognition.

[24]  Jonathan Smallwood,et al.  Mind-wandering While Reading: Attentional Decoupling, Mindless Reading and the Cascade Model of Inattention , 2011, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[25]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  The IOVP effect in mindless reading: Experiment and modeling , 2007, Vision Research.

[26]  J. Smallwood,et al.  The lights are on but no one’s home: Meta-awareness and the decoupling of attention when the mind wanders , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[27]  M. G. Pittau,et al.  A weakly informative default prior distribution for logistic and other regression models , 2008, 0901.4011.

[28]  D. Schacter,et al.  The Brain's Default Network , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[29]  J. Smallwood,et al.  Segmenting the stream of consciousness: The psychological correlates of temporal structures in the time series data of a continuous performance task , 2008, Brain and Cognition.

[30]  Daniel Smilek,et al.  Attention failures versus misplaced diligence: Separating attention lapses from speed–accuracy trade-offs , 2012, Consciousness and Cognition.

[31]  Michael J Kane,et al.  Drifting from slow to "D'oh!": working memory capacity and mind wandering predict extreme reaction times and executive control errors. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[32]  J. Smallwood Distinguishing how from why the mind wanders: a process-occurrence framework for self-generated mental activity. , 2013, Psychological bulletin.

[33]  Evelyn Barron,et al.  Absorbed in Thought , 2011, Psychological science.

[34]  Jonathan S. A. Carriere,et al.  Out of Mind, Out of Sight , 2010, Psychological science.

[35]  Jonathan W. Schooler,et al.  Re-representing consciousness: dissociations between experience and meta-consciousness , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[36]  Cataldo Guaragnella,et al.  A visual approach for driver inattention detection , 2007, Pattern Recognit..

[37]  I. Robertson,et al.  The absent mind: further investigations of sustained attention to response , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[38]  K. Rayner Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[39]  J. Deutsch,et al.  Attention: Some theoretical considerations. , 1963 .

[40]  D. Bates,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS , 2001 .

[41]  William N. Venables,et al.  Modern Applied Statistics with S , 2010 .

[42]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Wandering Minds: The Default Network and Stimulus-Independent Thought , 2007, Science.

[43]  J. Smallwood,et al.  Encoding during the attentional lapse: Accuracy of encoding during the semantic sustained attention to response task , 2006, Consciousness and Cognition.

[44]  Kristina M. Visscher,et al.  The neural bases of momentary lapses in attention , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[45]  Gillian Cohen,et al.  Hierarchical models in cognition: Do they have psychological reality? , 2000 .

[46]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: I , 1977 .

[47]  P. Dupont,et al.  Lesion neuroanatomy of the Sustained Attention to Response task , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[48]  H. Hughes The Linguistics Encyclopedia (2nd edition) , 2002 .

[49]  Johan Mårtensson,et al.  Do Intensive Studies of a Foreign Language Improve Associative Memory Performance? , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[50]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[51]  G. McConkie,et al.  The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading , 1975 .

[52]  K. Rayner The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[53]  K. Christoff,et al.  Undirected thought: Neural determinants and correlates , 2012, Brain Research.

[54]  Jonathan Smallwood,et al.  Pupillometric Evidence for the Decoupling of Attention from Perceptual Input during Offline Thought , 2011, PloS one.

[55]  Michael J Kane,et al.  Why does working memory capacity predict variation in reading comprehension? On the influence of mind wandering and executive attention. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[56]  E. Wagenmakers,et al.  Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: the case of psi: comment on Bem (2011). , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[57]  Kevin Fitzpatrick,et al.  Slow Fluctuations in Attentional Control of Sensory Cortex , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[58]  Jonathan S. A. Carriere,et al.  Anatomy of an error: A bidirectional state model of task engagement/disengagement and attention-related errors , 2009, Cognition.

[59]  M. Kane,et al.  Conducting the train of thought: working memory capacity, goal neglect, and mind wandering in an executive-control task. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[60]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[61]  Jonathan Smallwood,et al.  The Persistence of Thought , 2012, Psychological science.

[62]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  Reading strategy modulates parafoveal-on-foveal effects in sentence reading , 2013, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[63]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Eye Movements During Mindless Reading , 2010, Psychological science.

[64]  J. Smallwood,et al.  Counting the cost of an absent mind: Mind wandering as an underrecognized influence on educational performance , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[65]  K. Rayner,et al.  Mindless reading revisited: Eye movements during reading and scanning are different , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[66]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[67]  A. Treisman Contextual Cues in Selective Listening , 1960 .

[68]  M. Kane,et al.  Does mind wandering reflect executive function or executive failure? Comment on Smallwood and Schooler (2006) and Watkins (2008). , 2010, Psychological bulletin.

[69]  Steve Majerus,et al.  Neural Correlates of Ongoing Conscious Experience: Both Task-Unrelatedness and Stimulus-Independence Are Related to Default Network Activity , 2011, PloS one.

[70]  M A Just,et al.  A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. , 1980, Psychological review.

[71]  K. Christoff,et al.  Experience sampling during fMRI reveals default network and executive system contributions to mind wandering , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[72]  Brent A. Olde,et al.  How does the mind construct and represent stories , 2002 .

[73]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  Experimental Effects and Individual Differences in Linear Mixed Models: Estimating the Relationship between Spatial, Object, and Attraction Effects in Visual Attention , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[74]  J. Smallwood,et al.  Mind Wandering and Retrieval from Episodic Memory: A Pilot Event-Related Potential Study , 2008, Psychological reports.

[75]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Using E-Z reader to model the effects of higher level language processing on eye movements during reading , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[76]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Zoning Out while Reading: Evidence for Dissociations between Experience and Metaconsciousness. , 2004 .

[77]  J. Smallwood,et al.  The restless mind. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[78]  D. Gilbert,et al.  A Wandering Mind Is an Unhappy Mind , 2010, Science.

[79]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  Mindless reading revisited: An analysis based on the SWIFT model of eye-movement control , 2009, Vision Research.

[80]  J. Smallwood Why the Global Availability of Mind Wandering Necessitates Resource Competition: Reply to McVay and Kane (2010) , 2010 .

[81]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. , 2005, Psychological review.

[82]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Out for a Smoke , 2010, Psychological science.

[83]  I. Robertson,et al.  `Oops!': Performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[84]  J Driver,et al.  A selective review of selective attention research from the past century. , 2001, British journal of psychology.

[85]  J. Smallwood The footprints of a wandering mind: Further examination of the time course of an attentional lapse , 2011, Cognitive neuroscience.

[86]  Jonathan Smallwood,et al.  Insulation for Daydreams: A Role for Tonic Norepinephrine in the Facilitation of Internally Guided Thought , 2012, PloS one.

[87]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[88]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Investigating the causes of wrap-up effects: Evidence from eye movements and E–Z Reader , 2009, Cognition.

[89]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  The zoom lens of attention: Simulating shuffled versus normal text reading using the SWIFT model , 2012, Visual cognition.

[90]  Gary E. Raney,et al.  Eye movement control in reading and visual search: Effects of word frequency , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[91]  J. O'Regan,et al.  Mindless reading: Eye-movement characteristics are similar in scanning letter strings and reading texts , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[92]  E. Bizzi,et al.  The Cognitive Neurosciences , 1996 .

[93]  S. Liversedge,et al.  Oxford handbook of eye movements , 2011 .

[94]  K. Rayner,et al.  Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[95]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. , 1977 .

[96]  Steve Joordens,et al.  The eyes know what you are thinking: Eye movements as an objective measure of mind wandering , 2011, Consciousness and Cognition.

[97]  Jonathan Smallwood,et al.  Subjective experience and the attentional lapse: Task engagement and disengagement during sustained attention , 2004, Consciousness and Cognition.

[98]  N. Lavie Distracted and confused?: Selective attention under load , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[99]  P. Silvia,et al.  For Whom the Mind Wanders, and When , 2007, Psychological science.

[100]  L. Giambra,et al.  A Laboratory Method for Investigating Influences on Switching Attention to Task-Unrelated Imagery and Thought , 1995, Consciousness and Cognition.

[101]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  Eye movements during reading of randomly shuffled text , 2010, Vision Research.

[102]  Kirsten Malmkjaer,et al.  The Linguistics Encyclopedia , 2002 .

[103]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition , 1998 .

[104]  Jonathan Smallwood,et al.  Going AWOL in the Brain: Mind Wandering Reduces Cortical Analysis of External Events , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[105]  D. Broadbent Perception and communication , 1958 .

[106]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Role of locus coeruleus in attention and behavioral flexibility , 1999, Biological Psychiatry.

[107]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities , 1984 .

[108]  Brian D. Ripley,et al.  Modern applied statistics with S, 4th Edition , 2002, Statistics and computing.

[109]  M. Rugg,et al.  Electrophysiology of Mind: Event-Related Brain Potentials and Cognition , 1995 .

[110]  Daniel B Wright,et al.  Functions for traditional and multilevel approaches to signal detection theory , 2009, Behavior research methods.