Advantages and pitfalls in the application of mixed-model association methods

Mixed linear models are emerging as a method of choice for conducting genetic association studies in humans and other organisms. The advantages of the mixed-linear-model association (MLMA) method include the prevention of false positive associations due to population or relatedness structure and an increase in power obtained through the application of a correction that is specific to this structure. An underappreciated point is that MLMA can also increase power in studies without sample structure by implicitly conditioning on associated loci other than the candidate locus. Numerous variations on the standard MLMA approach have recently been published, with a focus on reducing computational cost. These advances provide researchers applying MLMA methods with many options to choose from, but we caution that MLMA methods are still subject to potential pitfalls. Here we describe and quantify the advantages and pitfalls of MLMA methods as a function of study design and provide recommendations for the application of these methods in practical settings.

[1]  D. Falconer.  The inheritance of liability to diseases with variable age of onset, with particular reference to diabetes mellitus , 1967, Annals of human genetics.

[2]  K. Abromeit.  Music Received , 2023, Notes.

[3]  C. R. Henderson,et al.  Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model. , 1975, Biometrics.

[4]  K. Roeder,et al.  Genomic Control for Association Studies , 1999, Biometrics.

[5]  M. Goddard,et al.  Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. , 2001, Genetics.

[6]  D. Reich,et al.  Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[7]  M. McMullen,et al.  A unified mixed-model method for association mapping that accounts for multiple levels of relatedness , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[8]  Keyan Zhao,et al.  An Arabidopsis Example of Association Mapping in Structured Samples , 2006, PLoS genetics.

[9]  G. Abecasis,et al.  Family-based association tests for genomewide association scans. , 2007, American journal of human genetics.

[10]  D. Heckerman,et al.  Efficient Control of Population Structure in Model Organism Association Mapping , 2008, Genetics.

[11]  Alkes L. Price,et al.  New approaches to population stratification in genome-wide association studies , 2010, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[12]  Ayellet V. Segrè,et al.  Hundreds of variants clustered in genomic loci and biological pathways affect human height , 2010, Nature.

[13]  H. Kang,et al.  Variance component model to account for sample structure in genome-wide association studies , 2010, Nature Genetics.

[14]  P. Visscher,et al.  Common SNPs explain a large proportion of heritability for human height , 2011 .

[15]  Zhiwu Zhang,et al.  Mixed linear model approach adapted for genome-wide association studies , 2010, Nature Genetics.

[16]  Daniel Gianola,et al.  Predicting genetic predisposition in humans: the promise of whole-genome markers , 2010, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[17]  W. G. Hill,et al.  Genome partitioning of genetic variation for complex traits using common SNPs , 2011, Nature Genetics.

[18]  Simon C. Potter,et al.  Genetic risk and a primary role for cell-mediated immune mechanisms in multiple sclerosis , 2011, Nature.

[19]  P. Visscher,et al.  GCTA: a tool for genome-wide complex trait analysis. , 2011, American journal of human genetics.

[20]  Ying Liu,et al.  FaST linear mixed models for genome-wide association studies , 2011, Nature Methods.

[21]  P. Visscher,et al.  Estimating missing heritability for disease from genome-wide association studies. , 2011, American journal of human genetics.

[22]  Mark I McCarthy,et al.  Genomic inflation factors under polygenic inheritance , 2011, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[23]  M. Stephens,et al.  Genome-wide Efficient Mixed Model Analysis for Association Studies , 2012, Nature Genetics.

[24]  D. Altshuler,et al.  Informed Conditioning on Clinical Covariates Increases Power in Case-Control Association Studies , 2012, PLoS genetics.

[25]  M. Pirinen,et al.  Including known covariates can reduce power to detect genetic effects in case-control studies , 2012, Nature Genetics.

[26]  G. McVean,et al.  Differential confounding of rare and common variants in spatially structured populations , 2011, Nature Genetics.

[27]  Peter Kraft,et al.  Analysis of case-control association studies with known risk variants , 2012, Bioinform..

[28]  M Erbe,et al.  Improving accuracy of genomic predictions within and between dairy cattle breeds with imputed high-density single nucleotide polymorphism panels. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[29]  Bjarni J. Vilhjálmsson,et al.  A mixed-model approach for genome-wide association studies of correlated traits in structured populations , 2012, Nature Genetics.

[30]  Tatiana I Axenovich,et al.  Rapid variance components–based method for whole-genome association analysis , 2012, Nature Genetics.

[31]  J. Mefford,et al.  The Covariate's Dilemma , 2012, PLoS genetics.

[32]  Bjarni J. Vilhjálmsson,et al.  An efficient multi-locus mixed model approach for genome-wide association studies in structured populations , 2012, Nature Genetics.

[33]  Peter Kraft,et al.  Heritability in the genome-wide association era , 2012, Human Genetics.

[34]  David C. Wilson,et al.  Host-microbe interactions have shaped the genetic architecture of inflammatory bowel disease , 2012, Nature.

[35]  Eleazar Eskin,et al.  Improved linear mixed models for genome-wide association studies , 2012, Nature Methods.

[36]  D. Clayton,et al.  Link Functions in Multi-Locus Genetic Models: Implications for Testing, Prediction, and Interpretation , 2012, Genetic epidemiology.

[37]  Xiang Zhou,et al.  Polygenic Modeling with Bayesian Sparse Linear Mixed Models , 2012, PLoS genetics.

[38]  Eleazar Eskin,et al.  Mixed models can correct for population structure for genomic regions under selection , 2013, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[39]  Kai Wang,et al.  An Analytical Comparison of the Principal Component Method and the Mixed Effects Model for Association Studies in the Presence of Cryptic Relatedness and Population Stratification , 2013, Human Heredity.

[40]  David Heckerman,et al.  FaST-LMM-Select for addressing confounding from spatial structure and rare variants , 2013, Nature Genetics.

[41]  Naomi R. Wray,et al.  Estimation and partitioning of polygenic variation captured by common SNPs for Alzheimer's disease, multiple sclerosis and endometriosis , 2012, Human molecular genetics.

[42]  David Heckerman,et al.  The benefits of selecting phenotype-specific variants for applications of mixed models in genomics , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[43]  Alkes L. Price,et al.  Response to Sul and Eskin , 2013, Nature Reviews Genetics.