Self-memory biases in explicit and incidental encoding of trait adjectives

An extensive literature has demonstrated that encoding information in a self-referential manner enhances subsequent memory performance. This 'self-reference effect' (i.e., better memory for self-referent than other-referent information) is generally elicited in paradigms that require participants to evaluate the self-descriptiveness of personality characteristics. Extending work of this kind, the current research explored the possibility that explicit evaluative processing is not a necessary precondition for the emergence of this effect. Rather, responses to self cues may enhance item encoding even in the absence of explicit evaluative instructions. We explored this hypothesis by testing memory for items encoded in either an evaluative or relational context. The relational context was achieved by requesting participants to report the spatial relationship between target stimuli, and visual or verbal referent cues. The results revealed a self-referent memory advantage, regardless of the encoding context or triggering cue. The theoretical implications of these findings are considered.

[1]  J. D. McGaugh The amygdala modulates the consolidation of memories of emotionally arousing experiences. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[2]  Georg Northoff,et al.  Self-referential processing in our brain—A meta-analysis of imaging studies on the self , 2006, NeuroImage.

[3]  P. Benson,et al.  Towards a functional neuroanatomy of self processing: effects of faces and words. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[4]  Jasmin Cloutier,et al.  The feeling of choosing: Self-involvement and the cognitive status of things past , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.

[5]  W. James,et al.  The Principles of Psychology. , 1983 .

[6]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction? , 1975 .

[7]  T. B. Rogers,et al.  Self-reference and the encoding of personal information. , 1977, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  William M. Kelley,et al.  Neuroanatomical Evidence for Distinct Cognitive and Affective Components of Self , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  J. Bargh Attention and Automaticity in the Processing of Self-Relevant Information , 1982 .

[10]  A. Jack,et al.  Varieties of self-systems worth having , 2005, Consciousness and Cognition.

[11]  Stephen G. Gilligan,et al.  Remembering information related to one's self ☆ , 1979 .

[12]  J. Bruner,et al.  Personal values as selective factors in perception. , 1948, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[13]  R. Zajonc Feeling and thinking : Preferences need no inferences , 1980 .

[14]  S. Klein,et al.  The nature of self-referent encoding: The contributions of elaborative and organizational processes. , 1988 .

[15]  R. Remington,et al.  Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: evidence for two forms of attentional capture. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  H. Gray,et al.  P 300 as an index of attention to self-relevant stimuli q , 2004 .

[17]  U. Neisser Five kinds of self‐knowledge , 1988 .

[18]  O. Lipp,et al.  When danger lurks in the background: attentional capture by animal fear-relevant distractors is specific and selectively enhanced by animal fear. , 2007, Emotion.

[19]  W. Klein,et al.  Post Hoc Construction of Self-Performance and Other Performance in Self-Serving Social Comparison , 2001 .

[20]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[21]  J. Knetsch,et al.  Willingness to Pay and Compensation Demanded: Experimental Evidence of an Unexpected Disparity in Measures of Value , 1984 .

[22]  Ying Zhu,et al.  Self-face recognition in attended and unattended conditions: an event-related brain potential study , 2006, Neuroreport.

[23]  G. W. Bradley Self-serving biases in the attribution process: A reexamination of the fact or fiction question. , 1978 .

[24]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Robust representations for faces: evidence from visual search. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  P. Benson,et al.  Recognizing one's own face , 2001, Cognition.

[26]  James L. McGaugh,et al.  Make mild moments memorable: add a little arousal , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  Steven Laureys,et al.  Short article: one's own face is hard to ignore , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[28]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Abnormalities in the awareness of action , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias , 1991 .

[30]  N. Anderson Likableness ratings of 555 personality-trait words. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  Blair T. Johnson,et al.  The self-reference effect in memory: a meta-analysis. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[32]  N. Moray Attention in Dichotic Listening: Affective Cues and the Influence of Instructions , 1959 .

[33]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias , 1991 .

[34]  D. Spalding The Principles of Psychology , 1873, Nature.

[35]  David J. Turk,et al.  Yours or mine? Ownership and memory , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.

[36]  F. Craik Levels of processing: Past, present... and future? , 2002, Memory.

[37]  K. Shapiro,et al.  Personal names and the attentional blink: a visual "cocktail party" effect. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  C. N. Macrae,et al.  Finding the Self? An Event-Related fMRI Study , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[39]  M. Mahoney,et al.  MIRROR-TIME: EMPIRICAL FINDINGS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR A CONSTRUCTIVIST PSYCHOTHERAPEUTIC TECHNIQUE , 2002 .

[40]  J. Keenan,et al.  Factors Controlling the Advantage of Self-Reference Over Other-Reference , 1992 .

[41]  Jane F. Banfield,et al.  Medial prefrontal activity predicts memory for self. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[42]  Bryan T. Denny,et al.  Medial prefrontal activity differentiates self from close others. , 2006, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[43]  P. Shaver,et al.  Cognitive consequences of self-awareness , 1976 .