Comparative analysis of speed's impact on muscle demands during partial body weight support motor-assisted elliptical training.

Individuals with walking limitations often experience challenges engaging in functionally relevant exercise. An adapted elliptical trainer (motor to assist pedal movement, integrated body weight harness, ramps/stairs, and grab rails) has been developed to help individuals with physical disabilities and chronic conditions regain/retain walking capacity and fitness. However, limited published studies are available to guide therapeutic interventions. This repeated measures study examined the influence of motor-assisted elliptical training speed on lower extremity muscle demands at four body weight support (BWS) levels commonly used therapeutically for walking. Electromyography (EMG) and pedal trajectory data were recorded as ten individuals without known disability used the motor-assisted elliptical trainer at three speeds [20,40, 60 revolutions per minute (RPM)] during each BWS level (0%, 20%, 40%, 60%). Overall, the EMG activity (peak, mean, duration) in key stabilizer muscles (i.e., gluteus medius, gluteus maximus, vastus lateralis, medial gastrocnemius and soleus) recorded at 60 RPM exceeded those at 40 RPM, which were higher than values at 20 RPM in all but three situations (gluteus medius mean at 0% BWS, vastus lateralis mean at 20% BWS, soleus duration at 40% BWS); however, these differences did not always achieve statistical significance. Slower motor-assisted speeds can be used to accommodate weakness of gluteus medius, gluteus maximus, vastus lateralis, medial gastrocnemius and soleus. As strength improves, training at faster motor-assisted speeds may provide a means to progressively challenge key lower extremity stabilizers.

[1]  S. Hesse,et al.  Influence of walking speed on lower limb muscle activity and energy consumption during treadmill walking of hemiparetic patients. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[2]  Impact of Elliptical Trainer Ergonomic Modifications on Perceptions of Safety, Comfort, Workout, and Usability for People With Physical Disabilities and Chronic Conditions , 2011, Physical Therapy.

[3]  J. Pietsch,et al.  The Victorian Active Script Programme: promising signs for general practitioners, population health, and the promotion of physical activity , 2004, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[4]  J. L. Walle,et al.  Medicine & Science in sports & Exercise , 2010 .

[5]  Carl A. Nelson,et al.  Modified Elliptical Machine Motor-Drive Design for Assistive Gait Rehabilitation , 2011 .

[6]  M. MacKay-Lyons,et al.  Cardiovascular stress during a contemporary stroke rehabilitation program: is the intensity adequate to induce a training effect? , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  S. Blair,et al.  Translating evidenced-based physical activity interventions into practice. The 2010 challenge. , 2002, American journal of preventive medicine.

[8]  Stella M. Yu Healthy People 2010 , 1998, Maternal and Child Health Journal.

[9]  J. Cram,et al.  Introduction to Surface Electromyography , 1998 .

[10]  D. Buchner Physical activity to prevent or reverse disability in sedentary older adults. , 2003, American journal of preventive medicine.

[11]  Donald R. Miller,et al.  Barriers, facilitators, and access for wheelchair users: substantive and methodologic lessons from a pilot study of environmental effects. , 2002, Social science & medicine.

[12]  Thad W. Buster,et al.  Similarity of Joint Kinematics and Muscle Demands Between Elliptical Training and Walking: Implications for Practice , 2010, Physical Therapy.

[13]  P. Åstrand Physical activity and fitness. , 1992, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[14]  H. Hislop,et al.  Daniel's and Worthingham's muscle testing : techniques of manual examination , 1995 .

[15]  M. MacKay-Lyons,et al.  Longitudinal changes in exercise capacity after stroke. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  J. Perry,et al.  Computer algorithms to characterize individual subject EMG profiles during gait. , 1992, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  W. Kohrt,et al.  American College of Sports Medicine Position Stand: physical activity and bone health. , 2004, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[18]  Thomas M Gill,et al.  A prehabilitation program for the prevention of functional decline: effect on higher-level physical function. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[19]  J. Fung,et al.  Faster Is Better: Implications for Speed-Intensive Gait Training After Stroke , 2004, Stroke.

[20]  M. MacKay-Lyons,et al.  Reduced Cardiorespiratory Fitness after Stroke: Biological Consequences and Exercise-Induced Adaptations , 2011, Stroke research and treatment.

[21]  C Finch,et al.  Current injury or disability as a barrier to being more physically active. , 2001, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[22]  J Perry,et al.  The Rancho EMG analyzer: a computerized system for gait analysis. , 1993, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[23]  G. Borg Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. , 1982, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[24]  Amy Rauworth,et al.  Physical activity participation among persons with disabilities: barriers and facilitators. , 2004, American journal of preventive medicine.

[25]  Alfred D. Grant Gait Analysis: Normal and Pathological Function , 2010 .

[26]  M. MacKay-Lyons,et al.  Exercise Capacity and Cardiovascular Adaptations to Aerobic Training Early After Stroke , 2005, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[27]  Walter R Frontera,et al.  Benefits of exercise for community-dwelling older adults. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[28]  Peter R. Cavanagh,et al.  Exercise and physical activity for older adults , 1998 .

[29]  Susan A. Bloomfield,et al.  Physical Activity and Bone Health , 2004 .

[30]  George A. Bekey,et al.  GAIT-ER-AID: An expert system for diagnosis of human gait , 1992, Artif. Intell. Medicine.