Women on professional society and journal editorial boards.

PURPOSE Membership on a professional medical society or journal editorial board is a marker of influence and prestige for those in academic medicine. This study presents the first comprehensive quantification of women on these boards and the implications for women in medicine. METHODS The numbers of women and men on professional society and journal editorial boards across 28 specialties (March 2004) were counted. The number of women holding multiple roles on these boards and the number of women holding top leadership positions on these boards were counted, and these proportions were compared. RESULTS Three-thousand-four-hundred-seventy-three individuals on 39 professional medical society boards and 54 journal editorial boards were included. Eighty-three percent (2,884) of board members were male. Men occupied > 80% of top leadership positions on these boards. Thirty-five of the 589 women in the study held multiple roles. Anesthesiology (p < 0.0025), pediatrics (p < 0.0001), dermatology (p = 0.0001), obstetrics/ gynecology (p = 0.05), medical genetics (p < 0.015) and rehabilitation medicine (p < 0.03) had significantly lower proportions of women on boards in comparison to the total women in the specialty. Internal medicine, plastic surgery, cardiology and general surgery had nearly equivalent proportions; in otolaryngology and family medicine, female board members slightly exceeded the proportion of women in the field. CONCLUSION Women's representation on society and editorial boards does not always reflect their presence in medical specialties, and it is critically lacking in certain specialties. Efforts should be made to attain parity of women leaders on these boards. Further efforts should be made to eliminate barriers to women's leadership in medicine.

[1]  L. Nonnemaker,et al.  Women physicians in academic medicine: new insights from cohort studies. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  S. Mackinnon,et al.  The gender gap in a surgical subspecialty: analysis of career and lifestyle factors. , 2004, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[3]  T. Johnson,et al.  Increasing Women's Leadership in Academic Medicine: Report of the AAMC Project Implementation Committee , 2002, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[4]  O. Jonasson.  Leaders in American surgery: where are the women? , 2002, Surgery.

[5]  Sharon E Straus,et al.  Mentoring in academic medicine: a systematic review. , 2006, JAMA.

[6]  S. Sonnad,et al.  Issues in the recruitment and success of women in academic surgery. , 2002, Surgery.

[7]  Compensation and advancement of women in academic medicine: Is there equity? , 2004 .

[8]  Benedek Ep.  Editorial practices of psychiatric and related journals: implications for women. , 1976 .

[9]  J. Utzinger,et al.  Gender composition of editorial boards of general medical journals , 2003, The Lancet.

[10]  B. Kennedy,et al.  Women on the Editorial Boards of Major Journals , 2001, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[11]  Women in Neuroscience (WIN): The First Twenty Years , 2002, Journal of the history of the neurosciences.

[12]  W. Bergfeld,et al.  Women Leaders in American Dermatology , 2004 .

[13]  K. Dickersin,et al.  Is there a sex bias in choosing editors? Epidemiology journals as an example. , 1998, JAMA.

[14]  A Gender Gap in the Next Generation of Physician-Scientists: Medical Student Interest and Participation in Research , 2002, Journal of Investigative Medicine.