Compelling Identity: Selves and Insecurity in Global, Corporate Management Development

Adopting a post-structuralist analytical framework, this article fuses two seminal notions, Alvesson and Willmott's identity regulation in organizations and Collinson's emphasis on insecurity within processes of identity construction, to unravel subjectivities and the production of identity in two global, corporate management development programs. Drawing on interviews and observation in the settings, the article contrasts discursive practices in the two programs. It then examines the micro-processes of program participants' identity work in each context, using as a heuristic tool Collinson's theory of conforming, dramaturgical and resisting selves. Contributing to critical studies in management education, this framing draws attention to the dynamics of power in shaping identities within management development. The study suggests new notions of how identity regulation and insecurity interact, relating to two `ideal types' or models of management development emerging in the fieldwork.

[1]  Michel Foucault,et al.  “Panopticism” from Discipline & Punish: The Birth of the Prison , 2009 .

[2]  G. Jack,et al.  National Identity, Globalization and the Discursive Construction of Organizational Identity , 2007 .

[3]  Andrew Sturdy,et al.  Management as a (Self) Confidence Trick: Management Ideas, Education and Identity Work , 2006 .

[4]  Andrew Jones.  Leading Questions: Developing What? An Anthropological Look at the Leadership Development Process Across Cultures , 2006 .

[5]  R. Simpson.  Masculinity and Management Education: Feminizing the MBA , 2006 .

[6]  Yiannis Gabriel,et al.  Learning Shock , 2005 .

[7]  P. Prasad.  Crafting Qualitative Research: Working in the Postpositivist Traditions , 2005 .

[8]  J. Hoobler.  Lip Service to Multiculturalism , 2005 .

[9]  Damian Hodgson,et al.  ‘Putting on a Professional Performance’: Performativity, Subversion and Project Management , 2005 .

[10]  David L. Collinson,et al.  Identities and Insecurities: Selves at Work , 2003 .

[11]  P. Fleming,et al.  Working at a Cynical Distance: Implications for Power, Subjectivity and Resistance , 2003 .

[12]  Looking for the Good Soldier, Švejk , 2002 .

[13]  Jeanie M. Forray,et al.  Considering Management Education: Insights from Critical Management Studies , 2002 .

[14]  M. Alvesson,et al.  Identity regulation as organizational control: Producing the appropriate individual , 2002 .

[15]  Ann Taket,et al.  Doing Critical Management Research , 2001, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[16]  Russ Vince,et al.  Power and emotion in organizational learning , 2001 .

[17]  Karen Locke.  Grounded Theory in Management Research , 2000 .

[18]  L. Perriton.  Verandah Discourses: Critical Management Education in Organizations , 2000 .

[19]  N. Hoffart.  Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2000 .

[20]  H. Ibarra.  Provisional Selves: Experimenting with Image and Identity in Professional Adaptation , 1999 .

[21]  A. Edmondson.  Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams , 1999 .

[22]  Christopher Grey,et al.  Rethinking Management Education. , 1999 .

[23]  Yiannis Gabriel.  Beyond Happy Families: A Critical Reevaluation of the Control-Resistance-Identity Triangle , 1999 .

[24]  Catherine Casey,et al.  "Come, Join Our Family": Discipline and Integration in Corporate Organizational Culture , 1999 .

[25]  Barbara Townley,et al.  FOUCAULT, POWER/KNOWLEDGE, AND ITS RELEVANCE FOR HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT , 1993 .

[26]  J. Robertson,et al.  Crafting Selves: Power, Gender, and Discourses of Identity in a Japanese Workplace , 1991 .

[27]  E. Goffman.  The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .