Information dynamics in carcinogenesis and tumor growth.

The storage and transmission of information is vital to the function of normal and transformed cells. We use methods from information theory and Monte Carlo theory to analyze the role of information in carcinogenesis. Our analysis demonstrates that, during somatic evolution of the malignant phenotype, the accumulation of genomic mutations degrades intracellular information. However, the degradation is constrained by the Darwinian somatic ecology in which mutant clones proliferate only when the mutation confers a selective growth advantage. In that environment, genes that normally decrease cellular proliferation, such as tumor suppressor or differentiation genes, suffer maximum information degradation. Conversely, those that increase proliferation, such as oncogenes, are conserved or exhibit only gain of function mutations. These constraints shield most cellular populations from catastrophic mutator-induced loss of the transmembrane entropy gradient and, therefore, cell death. The dynamics of constrained information degradation during carcinogenesis cause the tumor genome to asymptotically approach a minimum information state that is manifested clinically as dedifferentiation and unconstrained proliferation. Extreme physical information (EPI) theory demonstrates that altered information flow from cancer cells to their environment will manifest in-vivo as power law tumor growth with an exponent of size 1.62. This prediction is based only on the assumption that tumor cells are at an absolute information minimum and are capable of "free field" growth that is, they are unconstrained by external biological parameters. The prediction agrees remarkably well with several studies demonstrating power law growth in small human breast cancers with an exponent of 1.72+/-0.24. This successful derivation of an analytic expression for cancer growth from EPI alone supports the conceptual model that carcinogenesis is a process of constrained information degradation and that malignant cells are minimum information systems. EPI theory also predicts that the estimated age of a clinically observed tumor is subject to a root-mean square error of about 30%. This is due to information loss and tissue disorganization and probably manifests as a randomly variable lag phase in the growth pattern that has been observed experimentally. This difference between tumor size and age may impose a fundamental limit on the efficacy of screening based on early detection of small tumors. Independent of the EPI analysis, Monte Carlo methods are applied to predict statistical tumor growth due to perturbed information flow from the environment into transformed cells. A "simplest" Monte Carlo model is suggested by the findings in the EPI approach that tumor growth arises out of a minimally complex mechanism. The outputs of large numbers of simulations show that (a) about 40% of the populations do not survive the first two-generations due to mutations in critical gene segments; but (b) those that do survive will experience power law growth identical to the predicted rate obtained from the independent EPI approach. The agreement between these two very different approaches to the problem strongly supports the idea that tumor cells regress to a state of minimum information during carcinogenesis, and that information dynamics are integrally related to tumor development and growth.

[1]  T. Hislop,et al.  The British Columbia Mammography Screening Program: evaluation of the first 15 months. , 1992, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  T. Vincent,et al.  An evolutionary model of carcinogenesis. , 2003, Cancer research.

[3]  R L Wahl,et al.  An Immunohistochemical Study , 2006 .

[4]  E N Gilbert Information theory after 18 years. , 1966, Science.

[5]  H. D. de Koning,et al.  Nation‐wide breast cancer screening in the Netherlands: Support for breast‐cancer mortality reduction , 1995, International journal of cancer.

[6]  Rory A. Fisher,et al.  Statistical methods and scientific inference. , 1957 .

[7]  Carissa A. Sanchez,et al.  Evolution of neoplastic cell lineages in Barrett oesophagus , 1999, Nature Genetics.

[8]  R. Coleman,et al.  The prognostic significance of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging for patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma , 1998, Cancer.

[9]  Claude E. Shannon,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[10]  A. Shtil,et al.  Signal transduction pathways and transcriptional mechanisms as targets for prevention of emergence of multidrug resistance in human cancer cells. , 2001, Current drug targets.

[11]  Z. Agur,et al.  The growth law of primary breast cancer as inferred from mammography screening trials data. , 1998, British Journal of Cancer.

[12]  B. Frieden,et al.  Population genetics from an information perspective. , 2001, Journal of theoretical biology.

[13]  H A Johnson,et al.  Information theory in biology after 18 years. , 1970, Science.

[14]  U von Stockar,et al.  On-line determination of animal cell concentration. , 2001, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[15]  W. Thomson,et al.  β-Catenin Signaling: Therapeutic Strategies in Oncology , 2002 .

[16]  Paul S. Meltzer,et al.  Expression and functional significance of VE-cadherin in aggressive human melanoma cells: Role in vasculogenic mimicry , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  B. Frieden Physics from Fisher information , 1998 .

[18]  Y. Kitajima,et al.  Chemotherapy induces or increases expression of multidrug resistance‐associated protein in malignant melanoma cells , 2001, The British journal of dermatology.

[19]  E. T. Gawlinski,et al.  The glycolytic phenotype in carcinogenesis and tumor invasion: insights through mathematical models. , 2003, Cancer research.

[20]  N. Petrelli,et al.  The onset and extent of genomic instability in sporadic colorectal tumor progression. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  J. Völker,et al.  Communication between noncontacting macromolecules , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  A. Schäffer,et al.  Construction of evolutionary tree models for renal cell carcinoma from comparative genomic hybridization data. , 2000, Cancer research.

[23]  R. Heim,et al.  Using GFP in FRET-based applications. , 1999, Trends in cell biology.

[24]  J. Gray,et al.  Genome changes and gene expression in human solid tumors. , 2000, Carcinogenesis.

[25]  L. Baldetorp,et al.  Effects of repeated mammographic screening on breast cancer stage distribution. Results from a randomised study of 92 934 women in a Swedish county. , 1985, Acta radiologica. Oncology.

[26]  M. Neeman,et al.  Dynamic remodeling of the vascular bed precedes tumor growth: MLS ovarian carcinoma spheroids implanted in nude mice. , 1999, Neoplasia.

[27]  M. Hendrix,et al.  Molecular biology of breast cancer metastasis Molecular expression of vascular markers by aggressive breast cancer cells , 2000, Breast Cancer Research.

[28]  L. Loeb,et al.  Mutator phenotype may be required for multistage carcinogenesis. , 1991, Cancer research.

[29]  D. Birnbaum,et al.  Genome-wide search for loss of heterozygosity shows extensive genetic diversity of human breast carcinomas. , 1997, Cancer research.

[30]  P. Nowell The clonal evolution of tumor cell populations. , 1976, Science.

[31]  L. Brillouin,et al.  Science and information theory , 1956 .

[32]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[33]  M. Eigen,et al.  The hypercycle. A principle of natural self-organization. Part A: Emergence of the hypercycle. , 1977, Die Naturwissenschaften.

[34]  E. T. Gawlinski,et al.  A reaction-diffusion model of cancer invasion. , 1996, Cancer research.

[35]  B. Frieden,et al.  Lagrangians of physics and the game of Fisher-information transfer. , 1995, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[36]  W. Kendal The use of information theory to analyze genomic changes in neoplasia. , 1990, Mathematical biosciences.

[37]  Age-specific effectiveness of the Nijmegen population-based breast cancer-screening program: assessment of early indicators of screening effectiveness. , 1994, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[38]  Robert A Gatenby,et al.  Application of information theory and extreme physical information to carcinogenesis. , 2002, Cancer research.

[39]  W. Bodmer,et al.  Genetic pathways in colorectal and other cancers. , 1999, European journal of cancer.

[40]  Peter Schuster,et al.  A principle of natural self-organization , 1977, Naturwissenschaften.

[41]  N. Gibbs,et al.  The first three years of the Guildford Breast Screening Project. , 1984, Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer.

[42]  B. Iacopetta,et al.  A polymorphism in the enhancer region of the thymidylate synthase promoter influences the survival of colorectal cancer patients treated with 5-fluorouracil , 2001, British Journal of Cancer.

[43]  Robert A. Weinberg,et al.  Metastasis genes: A progression puzzle , 2002, Nature.

[44]  A. Lowy,et al.  Adenomatous polyposis coli/beta-catenin interaction and downstream targets: altered gene expression in gastrointestinal tumors. , 2003, Clinical colorectal cancer.

[45]  C Lengauer,et al.  Genetic instability and darwinian selection in tumours. , 1999, Trends in cell biology.

[46]  L. Tabár,et al.  Update of the Swedish two-county program of mammographic screening for breast cancer. , 1992, Radiologic clinics of North America.