DEA and ranking with the network-based approach: a case of R&D performance

[1]  C. Yang,et al.  A network-based approach for increasing discrimination in data envelopment analysis , 2009, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[2]  Necmi K. Avkiran,et al.  Opening the black box of efficiency analysis: An illustration with UAE banks , 2009 .

[3]  Klas Eric Soderquist,et al.  Use and impact of performance measurement results in R&D and NPD: an exploratory study , 2004 .

[4]  Tom Groot,et al.  Research quality and efficiency: An analysis of assessments and management issues in Dutch economics and business research programs , 2006 .

[5]  Rene Cordero,et al.  The measurement of innovation performance in the firm: An overview , 1990 .

[6]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[7]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Measuring Information Technology's Indirect Impact on Firm Performance , 2004, Inf. Technol. Manag..

[8]  K. Glaister,et al.  Measuring strategic decision making efficiency in different country contexts: a comparison of British and Turkish firms , 2010 .

[9]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Pajek - Program for Large Network Analysis , 1999 .

[10]  Wei Meng,et al.  Efficiency evaluation of basic research in China , 2006, Scientometrics.

[11]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  The measurement of Italian universities’ research productivity by a non parametric-bibliometric methodology , 2008, Scientometrics.

[12]  Guan Jiancheng,et al.  Evaluation and interpretation of knowledge production efficiency , 2004 .

[13]  F. Førsund,et al.  Slack-adjusted efficiency measures and ranking of efficient units , 1996 .

[14]  Ramakrishnan Ramanathan,et al.  Incorporating cost and environmental factors in quality function deployment using data envelopment analysis , 2009 .

[15]  M. Farrell.  The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[16]  M. Lai,et al.  Assessment of Intellectual Capital Management in Taiwanese IC Design Companies: Using DEA and the Malmquist Productivity Index , 2006 .

[17]  Jan Bilderbeek,et al.  R&D Performance Measurement: More than Choosing a Set of Metrics , 1997 .

[18]  Zilla Sinuany-Stern,et al.  Combining ranking scales and selecting variables in the DEA context: the case of industrial branches , 1998, Comput. Oper. Res..

[19]  N. Avkiran.  Productivity Analysis in the Service Sector with Data Envelopment Analysis , 2006 .

[20]  J. Linton,et al.  Analysis, ranking and selection of R&D projects in a portfolio , 2002 .

[21]  Gongbing Bi,et al.  DEA-based production planning , 2010 .

[22]  W. Cooper,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software , 1999 .

[23]  C. Tofallis,et al.  Improving Discernment in DEA Using Profiling , 1996 .

[24]  Cecilio Mar-Molinero,et al.  Measuring DEA efficiency in Internet companies , 2005, Decis. Support Syst..

[25]  Jill Johnes,et al.  Measuring the Research Performance of UK Economics Departments: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis , 1993 .

[26]  Sukanya Kemp,et al.  Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing , 2002 .

[27]  K. Tone,et al.  Dynamic DEA: A slacks-based measure approach , 2010 .

[28]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking: Data Envelopment Analysis with Spreadsheets and DEA Excel Solver , 2002 .

[29]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  Network DEA: A slacks-based measure approach , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[30]  Jonathan D. Linton,et al.  An Extension to a DEA Support System Used for Assessing R&D Projects , 2007 .

[31]  L. Freeman,et al.  The Development of Social Network Analysis: A Study in the Sociology of Science , 2005 .

[32]  M. Farrell.  The Measurement of Production Efficiency , 1957 .

[33]  B. M. Gupta,et al.  Assessment of impact of AICTE funding on R&D and educational development , 2005, Scientometrics.

[34]  Marcos Pereira Estellita Lins,et al.  Review of Methods for Increasing Discrimination in Data Envelopment Analysis , 2002, Ann. Oper. Res..

[35]  N. Avkiran.  Modelling knowledge production performance of research centres with a focus on triple bottom line benchmarking , 2006 .

[36]  P. Bonacich.  TECHNIQUE FOR ANALYZING OVERLAPPING MEMBERSHIPS , 1972 .

[37]  P. Andersen,et al.  A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis , 1993 .

[38]  Wen-Min Lu,et al.  An interactive benchmark model ranking performers - Application to financial holding companies , 2009, Math. Comput. Model..

[39]  Seema Sharma,et al.  Inter-country R&D efficiency analysis: An application of data envelopment analysis , 2008, Scientometrics.

[40]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[41]  Yaakov Roll,et al.  An application procedure for DEA , 1989 .

[42]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Multi-factor performance measure model with an application to Fortune 500 companies , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[43]  Avraham Shtub,et al.  R&D project evaluation: An integrated DEA and balanced scorecard approach ☆ , 2008 .

[44]  E. Wang,et al.  Relative efficiency of R&D activities: A cross-country study accounting for environmental factors in the DEA approach , 2007 .

[45]  N. C. P. Edirisinghe,et al.  Generalized DEA model of fundamental analysis and its application to portfolio optimization , 2007 .

[46]  Chiung-Wen Hsu,et al.  The government strategy for the upgrading of industrial technology in Taiwan , 2001 .

[47]  Yong-Tae Park,et al.  An international comparison of R&D efficiency: DEA approach , 2005 .

[48]  N. Avkiran,et al.  Predicting Bank Stock Performance with Fundamental Relative Analysis: Simultaneous Multi-Dimensional Benchmarking as an Investment Tool , 2008 .

[49]  C Serrano Cinca,et al.  Selecting DEA specifications and ranking units via PCA , 2004 .

[50]  Zilla Sinuany-Stern,et al.  Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..