Modeling neuroaffective biomarkers of drug addiction: A Bayesian nonparametric approach using dirichlet process mixtures

BACKGROUND The properties of neurophysiological processes related to addiction have received much attention in the literature. However, empirical evidence of meaningful and useful characterization of these processes is limited. Recent studies have found that electrophysiological responses to emotional and drug-related cues can be used to create profiles that reliably predict smoking relapse. NEW METHOD This paper evaluates the validity of classifying electrophysiological responses into distinct profiles using a Bayesian dirichlet process mixture (DPM) model. The DPM is a Bayesian nonparametric (BNP) method to modeling unknown number of profiles characterized by uncertainty in cluster membership and in cluster number. RESULTS The DPM model confirmed previously identified neuroaffective reactivity profiles, but also revealed a finer level of granularity in the clustering. Specifically, in addition to the two clusters previously identified in the literature, the BNP methods identified a cluster of individuals showing similar responses to smoking, pleasant, neutral and unpleasant cues. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS BNP models provide an alternative to the k-mean clustering approach to modeling EEG-based neuroaffective profiles. Unlike k-means clustering, BNP models compute the probability that a subject belongs to a cluster while taking into consideration uncertainty in the number of clusters. CONCLUSIONS Our results confirm the reliability of the two clusters previously identified in these data, but also provide new insights by revealing a cluster that presented similar responses to stimuli with different contents. This finding may be related to the uncertainty in classification or overlapping brain-reactivity profiles.

[1]  William M. Rand,et al.  Objective Criteria for the Evaluation of Clustering Methods , 1971 .

[2]  T. Robinson,et al.  Quantifying Individual Variation in the Propensity to Attribute Incentive Salience to Reward Cues , 2012, PloS one.

[3]  Behzad Nazari,et al.  Spike sorting: Which clustering method should be chosen? Which circumstances affect this selection? , 2017, 2017 Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering (ICEE).

[4]  K. Berridge,et al.  Incentive Salience and the Transition to Addiction , 2013 .

[5]  M. Sarter,et al.  The neuroscience of cognitive-motivational styles: Sign- and goal-trackers as animal models. , 2018, Behavioral neuroscience.

[6]  David R. Herring,et al.  Transdiagnostic trauma severity in anxiety and mood disorders: Functional brain activity during emotional scene processing. , 2019, Psychophysiology.

[7]  Christian P. Robert,et al.  Monte Carlo Statistical Methods , 2005, Springer Texts in Statistics.

[8]  Jason D. Robinson,et al.  Beyond cue reactivity: blunted brain responses to pleasant stimuli predict long‐term smoking abstinence , 2012, Addiction biology.

[9]  T. Ferguson A Bayesian Analysis of Some Nonparametric Problems , 1973 .

[10]  M. Paulus,et al.  Toward biomarkers of the addicted human brain: Using neuroimaging to predict relapse and sustained abstinence in substance use disorder , 2018, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry.

[11]  Jason D. Robinson,et al.  Prequit fMRI responses to pleasant cues and cigarette-related cues predict smoking cessation outcome. , 2014, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[12]  H. Jeffreys,et al.  Theory of probability , 1896 .

[13]  T. Robinson,et al.  Individual variation in resisting temptation: Implications for addiction , 2013, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[14]  K. Berridge,et al.  Liking, wanting, and the incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. , 2016, The American psychologist.

[15]  L. Radloff The CES-D Scale , 1977 .

[16]  D. Kearns,et al.  Sign-tracking predicts increased choice of cocaine over food in rats , 2015, Behavioural Brain Research.

[17]  Huda Akil,et al.  Individual differences in the attribution of incentive salience to reward-related cues: Implications for addiction , 2009, Neuropharmacology.

[18]  Raphael Gottardo,et al.  Sequential Dirichlet process mixtures of multivariate skew $t$-distributions for model-based clustering of flow cytometry data , 2017, The Annals of Applied Statistics.

[19]  M. Kenward,et al.  Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. , 1997, Biometrics.

[20]  K. Fagerström,et al.  Measuring degree of physical dependence to tobacco smoking with reference to individualization of treatment. , 1978, Addictive behaviors.

[21]  M. Bradley,et al.  Large-scale neural correlates of affective picture processing. , 2002, Psychophysiology.

[22]  R. Houston,et al.  Event-Related Potentials as Biomarkers of Behavior Change Mechanisms in Substance Use Disorder Treatment. , 2018, Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging.

[23]  T. Robinson,et al.  Neurobiological basis of individual variation in stimulus-reward learning , 2017, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences.

[24]  Anna Weinberg,et al.  Beyond good and evil: the time-course of neural activity elicited by specific picture content. , 2010, Emotion.

[25]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[26]  Jason D. Robinson,et al.  The late positive potential (LPP) in response to varying types of emotional and cigarette stimuli in smokers: a content comparison. , 2013, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[27]  M. Paulus,et al.  Functional neuroimaging for addiction medicine: From mechanisms to practical considerations. , 2016, Progress in brain research.

[28]  Menton M. Deweese,et al.  Beyond Cue Reactivity: Non-Drug-Related Motivationally Relevant Stimuli Are Necessary to Understand Reactivity to Drug-Related Cues , 2017, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[29]  A. Tomie,et al.  Behavioral characteristics and neurobiological substrates shared by Pavlovian sign-tracking and drug abuse , 2008, Brain Research Reviews.

[30]  David W. Frank,et al.  The reality of “food porn”: Larger brain responses to food‐related cues than to erotic images predict cue‐induced eating , 2017, bioRxiv.

[31]  April C. May,et al.  Electrophysiology for addiction medicine: From methodology to conceptualization of reward deficits. , 2016, Progress in brain research.

[32]  F. Versace,et al.  Heterogeneity in brain reactivity to pleasant and food cues: evidence of sign-tracking in humans. , 2016, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[33]  J. Sethuraman A CONSTRUCTIVE DEFINITION OF DIRICHLET PRIORS , 1991 .

[34]  David W. Frank,et al.  Toward Precision Medicine for Smoking Cessation: Developing a Neuroimaging-Based Classification Algorithm to Identify Smokers at Higher Risk for Relapse. , 2019, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[35]  Amy K. Schmid,et al.  Clustering gene expression time series data using an infinite Gaussian process mixture model , 2017, bioRxiv.

[36]  Ioannis Sgouralis,et al.  A Bayesian Nonparametric Approach to Single Molecule Förster Resonance Energy Transfer. , 2018, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[37]  K. Berridge From prediction error to incentive salience: mesolimbic computation of reward motivation , 2012, The European journal of neuroscience.

[38]  S. Shiffman,et al.  First lapses to smoking: within-subjects analysis of real-time reports. , 1996, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[39]  M. Bradley,et al.  Emotion and the motivational brain , 2010, Biological Psychology.

[40]  S. Shiffman,et al.  Prediction of lapse from associations between smoking and situational antecedents assessed by ecological momentary assessment. , 2007, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[41]  M. Bradley,et al.  Affective picture processing: the late positive potential is modulated by motivational relevance. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[42]  Radford M. Neal Markov Chain Sampling Methods for Dirichlet Process Mixture Models , 2000 .

[43]  T. Robinson,et al.  A selective role for dopamine in reward learning , 2010, Nature.