Identification of patients for clinical risk assessment by prediction of cardiovascular risk using default risk factor values

BackgroundTo identify high risk patients without cardiovascular disease requires assessment of risk factors. Primary care providers must therefore determine which patients without cardiovascular disease should be highest priority for cardiovascular risk assessment. One approach is to prioritise patients for assessment using a prior estimate of their cardiovascular risk. This prior estimate of cardiovascular risk is derived from risk factor data that are routinely held in electronic medical records, with unknown blood pressure and cholesterol levels replaced by default values derived from national survey data. This paper analyses the test characteristics of using such a strategy for identification of high risk patients.MethodsPrior estimates of Framingham cardiovascular risk were derived in a population obtained from the Health Survey for England 2003. Receiver operating characteristics curves were constructed for using a prior estimate of cardiovascular risk to identify patients at greater than 20% ten-year cardiovascular risk. This was compared to strategies using age, or diabetic and antihypertensive treatment status to identify high risk patients.ResultsThe area under the curve for a prior estimate of cardiovascular risk calculated using minimum data (0.933, 95% CI: 0.925 to 0.941) is significantly greater than for a selection strategy based on age (0.892, 95% CI: 0.882 to 0.902), or diabetic and hypertensive status (0.608, 95% CI: 0.584 to 0.632).ConclusionUsing routine data held on primary care databases it is possible to identify a population at high risk of cardiovascular disease. Information technology to help primary care prioritise patients for cardiovascular disease prevention may improve the efficiency of cardiovascular risk assessment.

[1]  Tom Marshall,et al.  Misleading Measurements: Modeling the Effects of Blood Pressure Misclassification in a United States Population , 2006, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[2]  R. Roberts,et al.  Monthly intra-individual variation in lipids over a 1-year period in 22 normal subjects. , 1999, Clinical biochemistry.

[3]  T. Marshall,et al.  Resource implications and health benefits of primary prevention strategies for cardiovascular disease in people aged 30 to 74: mathematical modelling study , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[4]  W. Harrison,et al.  Estimating the proportion of young adults on antihypertensive treatment that have been correctly diagnosed , 2008, Journal of Human Hypertension.

[5]  H. Tunstall-Pedoe,et al.  Estimation of ten-year risk of fatal cardiovascular disease in Europe: the SCORE project. , 2003, European heart journal.

[6]  J F Potter,et al.  Extract from : , 2009 .

[7]  T. Marshall The use of cardiovascular risk factor information in practice databases: making the best of patient data. , 2006, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[8]  T. Marshall When measurements are misleading: modelling the effects of blood pressure misclassification in the English population , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  J. Hippisley-Cox,et al.  studyfrom general practice: a validation sample prediction algorithm in an independent UK Performance of the QRISK cardiovascular risk , 2007 .

[10]  K. Anderson,et al.  Cardiovascular disease risk profiles. , 1991, American heart journal.

[11]  M. Woodward,et al.  Adding social deprivation and family history to cardiovascular risk assessment: the ASSIGN score from the Scottish Heart Health Extended Cohort (SHHEC) , 2005, Heart.