Spatially Coherent Matching for Robust Registration

In order to solve the registration problem, we propose a robust method called Spatially Coherent Matching (SCM), where it can get the underlying correspondences from the given putative sets of feature points for robust matching, and estimate the transformation for robust registration. Recovering correct matches and fitting transformations between image pairs are key components in the field of pattern recognition. The proposed SCM starts with a putative correspondence set which is contaminated by degradations (e.g., occlusion, deformation, rotation, and outliers), and the main goal is to identify the true correspondences and estimate the underlying transformation. Then we formulate this challenging problem by the spatially coherent matching model with a robust exponential distance loss and a spatial constraint. Based on the regularization theory, SCM preserves the topological structure of the adjacent features. Moreover, a sparse approximation strategy is used to improve the efficiency. Finally, the experimental results reveal that the proposed method outperforms current state-of-the-art methods in most test scenarios on several real image datasets and synthesized datasets.

[1]  Andriy Myronenko,et al.  Point Set Registration: Coherent Point Drift , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[2]  Anand Rangarajan,et al.  A new point matching algorithm for non-rigid registration , 2003, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[3]  Andrea Vedaldi,et al.  Vlfeat: an open and portable library of computer vision algorithms , 2010, ACM Multimedia.

[4]  Gang Wang,et al.  Robust Non-Rigid Point Set Registration Using Spatially Constrained Gaussian Fields , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[5]  Gang Wang,et al.  Gaussian field consensus: A robust nonparametric matching method for outlier rejection , 2018, Pattern Recognit..

[6]  Junjun Jiang,et al.  Robust Feature Matching for Remote Sensing Image Registration via Locally Linear Transforming , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[7]  S T Roweis,et al.  Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding. , 2000, Science.

[8]  Michael S. Brown,et al.  In Defence of RANSAC for Outlier Rejection in Deformable Registration , 2012, ECCV.

[9]  Mongi A. Abidi,et al.  A new method for the registration of three-dimensional point-sets: The Gaussian Fields framework , 2010, Image Vis. Comput..

[10]  Matthijs C. Dorst Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2011 .

[11]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Shape matching and object recognition using shape contexts , 2010, 2010 3rd International Conference on Computer Science and Information Technology.

[12]  Baba C. Vemuri,et al.  Robust Point Set Registration Using Gaussian Mixture Models , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[13]  Gang Wang,et al.  Context-Aware Gaussian Fields for Non-rigid Point Set Registration , 2016, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[14]  Zhanyi Hu,et al.  Rejecting Mismatches by Correspondence Function , 2010, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[15]  Hongsheng Li,et al.  Object Matching Using a Locally Affine Invariant and Linear Programming Techniques , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[16]  Zhuowen Tu,et al.  Robust Estimation of Nonrigid Transformation for Point Set Registration , 2013, 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[17]  Paul J. Besl,et al.  A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[18]  Gang Wang,et al.  A robust non-rigid point set registration method based on asymmetric gaussian representation , 2015, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[19]  Zhuowen Tu,et al.  Robust Point Matching via Vector Field Consensus , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[20]  Robert C. Bolles,et al.  Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography , 1981, CACM.

[21]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  A Generalized Representer Theorem , 2001, COLT/EuroCOLT.

[22]  Cordelia Schmid,et al.  A Comparison of Affine Region Detectors , 2005, International Journal of Computer Vision.