Screen content image quality assessment using edge model

Since the human visual system (HVS) is highly sensitive to edges, a novel image quality assessment (IQA) metric for assessing screen content images (SCIs) is proposed in this paper. The turnkey novelty lies in the use of an existing parametric edge model to extract two types of salient attributes - namely, edge contrast and edge width, for the distorted SCI under assessment and its original SCI, respectively. The extracted information is subject to conduct similarity measurements on each attribute, independently. The obtained similarity scores are then combined using our proposed edge-width pooling strategy to generate the final IQA score. Hopefully, this score is consistent with the judgment made by the HVS. Experimental results have shown that the proposed IQA metric produces higher consistency with that of the HVS on the evaluation of the image quality of the distorted SCI than that of other state-of-the-art IQA metrics.

[1]  Weisi Lin,et al.  Perceptual visual quality metrics: A survey , 2011, J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent..

[2]  Weisi Lin,et al.  Perceptual Quality Assessment of Screen Content Images , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[3]  Sheila S. Hemami,et al.  VSNR: A Wavelet-Based Visual Signal-to-Noise Ratio for Natural Images , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[4]  Weisi Lin,et al.  Image Quality Assessment Based on Gradient Similarity , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[5]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Multi-scale structural similarity for image quality assessment , 2003 .

[6]  Gustavo de Veciana,et al.  An information fidelity criterion for image quality assessment using natural scene statistics , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[7]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Gradient Magnitude Similarity Deviation: A Highly Efficient Perceptual Image Quality Index , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[8]  Zhou Wang,et al.  A Patch-Structure Representation Method for Quality Assessment of Contrast Changed Images , 2015, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[9]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[10]  Xiangchu Feng,et al.  Edge Strength Similarity for Image Quality Assessment , 2013, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[11]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Multiscale structural similarity for image quality assessment , 2003, The Thrity-Seventh Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers, 2003.

[12]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Image information and visual quality , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[13]  Xuanqin Mou,et al.  An image quality assessment metric based on Non-shift Edge , 2011, 2011 18th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[14]  Lai-Man Po,et al.  Edge-Based Structural Similarity for Image Quality Assessment , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing Proceedings.

[15]  Kai Zeng,et al.  Perceptual screen content image quality assessment and compression , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[16]  David Zhang,et al.  FSIM: A Feature Similarity Index for Image Quality Assessment , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[17]  P.J.L. van Beek,et al.  Edge-Based Image Representation and Coding , 1995 .

[18]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Information Content Weighting for Perceptual Image Quality Assessment , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[19]  Eric C. Larson,et al.  Most apparent distortion: full-reference image quality assessment and the role of strategy , 2010, J. Electronic Imaging.