An Arduous and Unprofitable Undertaking: The Enclosure of Stanton Harcourt, Oxfordshire

This paper provides a case study of the parliamentary enclosure of Stanton Harcourt, Oxfordshire. A collection of nearly eighty letters reveals the often-acrimonious negotiations over the draft clauses of the enclosure bill, and the extent of the concessions needed to overcome opposition to enclosure. Rents on the manorial lords property in Stanton Harcourt after enclosure are adjusted to obtain the income actually derived from the land. These time-series are compared with three counterfactual paths for income had the land remained open. At best enclosure raised net rents received by an immediate and persistent 7%. At worst income would have been slightly higher had the land remained open. Under the conventional method of project appraisal, for the manorial lord the enclosure was 100% unprofitable in both the short and long run. Perhaps Stanton Harcourt is best seen as an example of enclosure driven by motives other than purely agricultural profits.

[1]  Tim Leunig,et al.  New Answers to Old Questions: Transport Costs and the Slow Adoption of Ring Spinning in Lancashire , 1998 .

[2]  Norbert Paddags,et al.  The German Railways - The Economic and Political Feasibility of Fiscal Reforms During the Inflation of the Early 1920s , 1997 .

[3]  C. Searle Customary Tenants and the Enclosure of the Cumbrian Commons , 1993 .

[4]  M. Turner English Parliamentary Enclosure: Its Historical Geography and Economic History , 1980 .

[5]  G. Watts,et al.  Journals , 1881, The Lancet.

[6]  M. Turner,et al.  A Domesday of English enclosure acts and awards , 1978 .

[7]  Gordon E Mingay,et al.  Parliamentary Enclosure in England: An Introduction to its Causes, Incidence and Impact, 1750-1850 , 1997 .

[8]  J. Yelling Common Field and Enclosure in England 1450-1850 , 1977 .

[9]  A. G. Gardiner The life of Sir William Harcourt , 1923 .

[10]  P. David,et al.  Discussion Papers in Economic and Social History Path Dependence and the Quest for Historical Economics: One More Chorus of the Ballad of Qwerty , 2022 .

[11]  D. North Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance: Economic performance , 1990 .

[12]  T. Harris,et al.  The accuracy of enclosure estimates: some evidence from northern England , 1982 .

[13]  John Beckett,et al.  Agricultural rent in England, 1690-1914 , 1997 .

[14]  A. Offer Farm tenure and land values in England, c. 1750‐1950 , 1991 .

[15]  D. Brown The Variety of Motives for Parliamentary Enclosure: The Example of the Cannock Chase Area, 1773-1887 , 1994 .

[16]  G. Mingay,et al.  English landed society in the eighteenth century , 1964 .

[17]  J. Maddicott Property and Politics , 1986 .

[18]  Jane Humphries,et al.  Enclosures, Common Rights, and Women: The Proletarianization of Families in the Late Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth Centuries , 1990, The Journal of Economic History.

[19]  D. North Institutions, institutional change and economic performance: Cambridge university press. , 1990 .

[20]  S. Fenoaltea Risk, transaction costs, and the organization of medieval agriculture☆ , 1976 .

[21]  Sheila Lambert The Scholarly Resources edition of the House of Commons : sessional papers of the eighteenth century , 1975 .

[22]  S. Pollard,et al.  English Landed Society in the Nineteenth Century. , 1964 .

[23]  R. Allen The Efficiency and Distributional Consequences of Eighteenth Century Enclosures , 1982 .

[24]  J. Chapman Enclosure commissioners as landscape planners , 1993 .

[25]  Gregory Clark,et al.  Land Hunger: Land as a Commodity and as a Status Good, England, 1500–1910 , 1998 .

[26]  F. Emery. The Oxfordshire landscape , 1974 .

[27]  Paul A. David,et al.  General Purpose Technologies and Surges in Productivity: Historical Reflections on the Future of the ICT Revolution , 1999 .

[28]  Charles Feinstein,et al.  Conjectures and Contrivances: Economic Growth and the Standard of Living in Britain During the Industrial Revolution , 1996 .

[29]  R. Allen The price of freehold land and the interest rate in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries , 1988 .

[30]  G. Clark Renting The Revolution , 1998, The Journal of Economic History.

[31]  W. Tate The English village community and the enclosure movements , 1967 .

[32]  W. Bean What is History , 1964 .

[33]  Donald N. McCloskey Fenoaltea on open fields: A comment , 1977 .

[34]  Donald N. McCloskey The Prudent Peasant: New Findings on Open Fields , 1991, The Journal of Economic History.

[35]  J. L. Hammond,et al.  The Village Labourer , 1978 .

[36]  G. Boyer England's Two Agricultural Revolutions , 1993, The Journal of Economic History.

[37]  M. Havinden,et al.  Estate Villages: A Study of the Berkshire Villages of Ardington and Lockinge , 1966 .

[38]  J. Humphries Commoners: Common Right, Enclosure and Social Change in England, 1700–1820. By J. M. Neeson. Past and Present Publications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993. Pp. xiv, 382. $54.95 , 1995, Journal Economic History.

[39]  S. Fenoaltea Fenoaltea on open fields: A reply☆ , 1977 .

[40]  R. Allen Enclosure and the yeoman , 1992 .

[41]  L. Brunt An Arbitrage Model in Crop Rotation in 18th Century England , 1999 .

[42]  M. Turner,et al.  Renting The Revolution: A Reply to Clark , 1998, Journal Economic History.

[43]  K. Snell,et al.  Annals of the Labouring Poor: Social Change and Agrarian England, 1660-1900 , 1987 .

[44]  A. Offer Discussion Papers in Economic and Social History , 2000 .

[45]  Philip Grover,et al.  The Stroudwater Canal Company and its Role in the Mechanisation of the Gloucestershire Woollen Industry, 1779-1840 , 1996 .

[46]  J. Chambers ENCLOSURE AND LABOUR SUPPLY IN THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION , 1953 .

[47]  G. Clark Commons Sense: Common Property Rights, Efficiency, and Institutional Change , 1998, The Journal of Economic History.