The International C2 Journal the Editorial Staff for More Information Enterprise Command, Control, and Design: Bridging C2 Practice and Ct Research

Abstract : Command and control (C2) is comprised largely of activities in the cognitive and social domains. As such, C2 has represented a critical aspect of military planning and execution; time-tested approaches to C2 in military organizations and processes remain prevalent. In contrast, scholarly research in the C2 domain remains divergent; chasm exists between research and continuing C2 practice. This is particularly the case with research in the area of Contingency Theory (CT). The central premise of CT is that no single enterprise design is ideal for all missions, environments, and contexts. Because military organizations will continue to undertake complex missions in diverse and challenging environments and contexts, one would expect to see C2 approaches that have enterprise agility. At the very least, one would expect the military to be exploring non-traditional approaches to C2 vigorously. Given the abundant CT research, one would expect leaders and policy makers to redesign high-performance enterprises to fit shifting mission, environmental, and contextual circumstances better. Instead one sees that remarkably traditional and often ill-fitting C2 approaches predominate. The problem is that few CT scholars understand current C2 practice sufficiently to apply such research directly, and few C2 researchers, analysts, leaders, and policy makers understand CT research sufficiently to take advantage of corresponding enterprise design opportunities. Even the terms used by members of the CT and C2 communities differ. This article takes four steps toward bridging the chasm between C2 practice and CT research: (1) Summarizes the tenets of CT in terms that can inform C2; (2) Bridges several key terminological gaps between the communities; (3) Highlights C2 research that develops new CT knowledge for enterprise design; and (4) Outlines a research agenda to address practical C2 issues. As such, this article can inform the CT researcher as well as the C2 practitioner.

[1]  M. Hannan,et al.  The Population Ecology of Organizations , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[2]  C. Hardy Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems , 1983 .

[3]  C. Perrow A FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ORGANIZATIONS , 1967 .

[4]  Robert T. Hamilton,et al.  THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN STRATEGY‐STRUCTURE FIT AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE IN NEW ZEALAND: EVIDENCE OF GENERALITY AND VALIDITY WITH ENHANCED CONTROLS* , 1992 .

[5]  Chris Goldspink,et al.  Strategic Organizational Diagnosis and Design: Developing Theory for Application by Richard M. Burton and Børge Obel , 2000, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[6]  Krishna R. Pattipati,et al.  Analytic Model Driven Organizational Design and Experimentation in Adaptive Command and Control , 1999 .

[7]  R E Miles,et al.  Organizational strategy, structure, and process. , 1978, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[8]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[9]  David S Alberts,et al.  Planning: Complex Endeavors , 2007 .

[10]  R. Duncan What is the right organization structure? Decision tree analysis provides the answer , 1979 .

[11]  M. Malone The Virtual Corporation , 1993 .

[12]  W. Ashby,et al.  An Introduction to Cybernetics , 1957 .

[13]  J. Pennings The Relevance of the Structural-Contingency Model for Organizational Effectiveness. , 1975 .

[14]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Structuring of Organizations , 1979 .

[15]  L. Donaldson The Contingency Theory of Organizations , 2001 .

[16]  R. Keller,et al.  Technology-Information Processing Fit and the Performance of R&D Project Groups: A Test of Contingency Theory , 1994 .

[17]  Lawrence B. Mohr,et al.  Organizational Technology and Organizational Structure. , 1971 .

[18]  Børge Obel,et al.  Strategic organizational diagnosis and design : developing theory for application , 1995 .

[19]  K. Weick FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[20]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[21]  Mark E. Nissen,et al.  Defining and exploring the terrorism field: Toward an intertheoretic, agent-based approach , 2007 .

[22]  Carol McCann,et al.  RE-CONCEPTUALIZING COMMAND AND CONTROL , 2002 .

[23]  Diane H. Sonnenwald,et al.  Information behavior in dynamic group work contexts: interwoven situational awareness, dense social networks and contested collaboration in command and control , 2000, Inf. Process. Manag..

[24]  Robert T. Hamilton,et al.  The logic of New Zealand business : strategy, structure and performance , 1993 .

[25]  C. Mills,et al.  The Theory of Social and Economic Organization , 1948 .

[26]  Mark E. Nissen,et al.  Hypothesis Testing of Edge Organizations: Specifying Computational C2 Models for Experimentation , 2005 .

[27]  Richard E. Hayes,et al.  Power to the Edge: Command, Control in the Information Age , 2003 .

[28]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Structure in 5's: A Synthesis of the Research on Organization Design , 1980, Management Science.

[29]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[30]  Milton Harris,et al.  Organization Design , 2000, Manag. Sci..

[31]  Mark E. Nissen,et al.  Hypothesis Testing of Edge Organizations: Modeling the C2 Organization Design Space , 2007 .

[32]  Clay Sprawls,et al.  The virtual corporation , 1993 .

[33]  W. Ouchi,et al.  Theory Z: How American Business Can Meet the Japanese Challenge. , 1981 .

[34]  C. Ciborra The Platform Organization: Recombining Strategies, Structures, and Surprises , 1996 .

[35]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[36]  Viktor Mikhaĭlovich Glushkov,et al.  An Introduction to Cybernetics , 1957, The Mathematical Gazette.

[37]  L. Argote Input uncertainty and organizational coordination in hospital emergency units. , 1982, Administrative science quarterly.

[38]  K. Weick,et al.  Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. , 1993 .

[39]  Edward F. Harvey Technology and the Structure of Organizations , 1968 .

[40]  A. Hargadon Organizations in Action:Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory (Book) , 2003 .

[41]  Børge Obel,et al.  Organizational Design : A Step-by-Step Approach , 2006 .

[42]  Mark E. Nissen,et al.  Hypothesis Testing of Edge Organizations: Simulating performance under industrial era and 21st century condition. , 2006 .

[43]  J. Aken Management Research Based on the Paradigm of the Design Sciences: The Quest for Field-Tested and Grounded Technological Rules , 2004 .

[44]  Joan C. Woodward Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice , 1966 .

[45]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration , 1967 .

[46]  Alfred Dupont Chandler,et al.  战略与结构 : 美国工商企业成长的若干篇章=strategy and structure : chapters in the history of the American industrial enterprise , 1962 .

[47]  Howard E. Aldrich Organizations and Environments , 1979 .

[48]  L. Donaldson STRATEGY AND STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENT TO REGAIN FIT AND PERFORMANCE: IN DEFENCE OF CONTINGENCY THEORY , 1987 .

[49]  H. Simon,et al.  The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.) , 1996 .

[50]  Jay R. Galbraith Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .