Long-term experiences with genetic consultation in people with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer

[1]  A. Green,et al.  Predictive Genetic Testing and Alternatives to Face to Face Results Disclosure: A Retrospective Review of Patients Preference for Alternative Modes of BRCA 1 and 2 Results Disclosure in the Republic of Ireland , 2016, Journal of Genetic Counseling.

[2]  S. van Dulmen,et al.  Counselees’ Expressed Level of Understanding of the Risk Estimate and Surveillance Recommendation are Not Associated with Breast Cancer Surveillance Adherence , 2016, Journal of Genetic Counseling.

[3]  M. Golatta,et al.  Adherence to the breast cancer surveillance program for women at risk for familial breast and ovarian cancer versus overscreening: a monocenter study in Germany , 2016, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[4]  P. Butow,et al.  Public preferences for communicating personal genomic risk information: a focus group study , 2015, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[5]  E. Hahnen,et al.  Klassifizierung von „variants of unknown significance“ (VUS) beim familiären Brust- und Eierstockkrebs , 2015, medizinische genetik.

[6]  R. Jagsi,et al.  Concerns about cancer risk and experiences with genetic testing in a diverse population of patients with breast cancer. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  Martha B. Adams,et al.  Randomized Trial of Telegenetics vs. In-Person Cancer Genetic Counseling: Cost, Patient Satisfaction and Attendance , 2015, Journal of Genetic Counseling.

[8]  L. Peipins,et al.  Cognitive and affective influences on perceived risk of ovarian cancer , 2015, Psycho-oncology.

[9]  M. Kartal,et al.  Breast cancer risk perceptions of Turkish women attending primary care: a cross-sectional study , 2014, BMC Women's Health.

[10]  S. Buys,et al.  Expanding access to BRCA1/2 genetic counseling with telephone delivery: a cluster randomized trial. , 2014, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[11]  QuinnJessica,et al.  Perceived Versus Objective Breast Cancer Risk in Diverse Women , 2014 .

[12]  K. Kerlikowske,et al.  Perceived versus objective breast cancer risk in diverse women. , 2014, Journal of women's health.

[13]  J. Garber,et al.  Randomized noninferiority trial of telephone versus in-person genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  Suk-Jeong Lee,et al.  Estimated risks and optimistic self-perception of breast cancer risk in Korean women. , 2013, Applied nursing research : ANR.

[15]  H. Brunner,et al.  More breast cancer patients prefer BRCA-mutation testing without prior face-to-face genetic counseling , 2013, Familial Cancer.

[16]  Haley R. Eidem,et al.  Effects of informed consent for individual genome sequencing on relevant knowledge , 2012, Clinical genetics.

[17]  C. McBride,et al.  Patients’ understanding of and responses to multiplex genetic susceptibility test results , 2012, Genetics in Medicine.

[18]  Nina Ditsch,et al.  Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: new genes, new treatments, new concepts. , 2011, Deutsches Arzteblatt international.

[19]  D. Evans,et al.  Genetic testing for familial/hereditary breast cancer—comparison of guidelines and recommendations from the UK, France, the Netherlands and Germany , 2011, Journal of Community Genetics.

[20]  Perry W. Payne,et al.  Regional differences in awareness and attitudes regarding genetic testing for disease risk and ancestry , 2010, Human Genetics.

[21]  C. McBride,et al.  Patient responses to genetic information: studies of patients with hereditary cancer syndromes identify issues for use of genetic testing in nephrology practice. , 2010, Seminars in nephrology.

[22]  A. Samanek,et al.  Australian Study on Public Knowledge of Human Genetics and Health , 2008, Public Health Genomics.

[23]  Giovanni Parmigiani,et al.  Meta-analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 penetrance. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  Lidewij Henneman,et al.  Public Experiences, Knowledge and Expectations about Medical Genetics and the Use of Genetic Information , 2004, Public Health Genomics.

[25]  S. Kardia,et al.  Exploring the Public Understanding of Basic Genetic Concepts , 2004, Journal of Genetic Counseling.

[26]  N. Facione,et al.  Predictors of perceived breast cancer risk and the relation between perceived risk and breast cancer screening: a meta-analytic review. , 2004, Preventive medicine.

[27]  P. Butow,et al.  Psychological outcomes and risk perception after genetic testing and counselling in breast cancer: a systematic review , 2003, The Medical journal of Australia.

[28]  W. Foulkes,et al.  An evaluation of needs of female BRCA1and BRCA2 carriers undergoing genetic counselling , 2000, Journal of medical genetics.

[29]  A. Clarke,et al.  Why do women attend familial breast cancer clinics? , 2000, Journal of medical genetics.

[30]  G. Lenoir,et al.  An update on DNA-based BRCA1/BRCA2 genetic counseling in hereditary breast cancer. , 1999, Cancer genetics and cytogenetics.

[31]  A. Howell,et al.  The impact of genetic counselling on risk perception in women with a family history of breast cancer. , 1994, British Journal of Cancer.

[32]  S. Seal,et al.  Localization of a breast cancer susceptibility gene, BRCA2, to chromosome 13q12-13. , 1994, Science.

[33]  M. King,et al.  Linkage of early-onset familial breast cancer to chromosome 17q21. , 1990, Science.

[34]  J. Klijn,et al.  Psychological impact of receiving a BRCA1/BRCA2 test result. , 2001, American journal of medical genetics.

[35]  B. Rimer,et al.  Genetic counseling and testing for breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility: what do women want? , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.