In Vivo Electrocochleography in Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users Implicates TMPRSS3 in Spiral Ganglion Function

Cochlear implantation, a surgical method to bypass cochlear hair cells and directly stimulate the spiral ganglion, is the standard treatment for severe-to-profound hearing loss. Changes in cochlear implant electrode array design and surgical approach now allow for preservation of acoustic hearing in the implanted ear. Electrocochleography (ECochG) was performed in eight hearing preservation subjects to assess hair cell and neural function and elucidate underlying genetic hearing loss. Three subjects had pathogenic variants in TMPRSS3 and five had pathogenic variants in genes known to affect the cochlear sensory partition. The mechanism by which variants in TMPRSS3 cause genetic hearing loss is unknown. We used a 500-Hz tone burst to record ECochG responses from an intracochlear electrode. Responses consist of a cochlear microphonic (hair cell) and an auditory nerve neurophonic. Cochlear microphonics did not differ between groups. Auditory nerve neurophonics were smaller, on average, in subjects with TMPRSS3 deafness. Results of this proof-of-concept study provide evidence that pathogenic variants in TMPRSS3 may impact function of the spiral ganglion. While ECochG as a clinical and research tool has been around for decades, this study illustrates a new application of ECochG in the study of genetic hearing and deafness in vivo.

[1]  Viral D Tejani,et al.  Using Neural Response Telemetry to Monitor Physiological Responses to Acoustic Stimulation in Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users , 2017, Ear and hearing.

[2]  C. Buchman,et al.  Round Window Electrocochleography Just Before Cochlear Implantation: Relationship to Word Recognition Outcomes in Adults , 2014, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[3]  C. Zdanski,et al.  Cochlear Implantation in Children with Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder , 2010, Ear and hearing.

[4]  P. Abbas,et al.  Relationships Among Peripheral and Central Electrophysiological Measures of Spatial and Spectral Selectivity and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users , 2015, Ear and hearing.

[5]  B. Müller-Myhsok,et al.  Autosomal recessive non-syndromic deafness locus (DFNB8) maps on chromosome 21q22 in a large consanguineous kindred from Pakistan. , 1996, Human molecular genetics.

[6]  D. Henderson,et al.  Evidence that inner hair cells are the major source of cochlear summating potentials , 1997, Hearing Research.

[7]  C. Turner,et al.  Combining acoustic and electrical hearing , 2003 .

[8]  C. Buchman,et al.  Intraoperative Round Window Electrocochleography and Speech Perception Outcomes in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients , 2014, Ear and hearing.

[9]  Y. J. Lee,et al.  Pathogenic mutations but not polymorphisms in congenital and childhood onset autosomal recessive deafness disrupt the proteolytic activity of TMPRSS3 , 2003, Journal of medical genetics.

[10]  C. Cremers,et al.  Genotype–Phenotype Correlation in DFNB8/10 Families with TMPRSS3 Mutations , 2011, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[11]  Omid Majdani,et al.  Hearing Preservation Outcomes with Different Cochlear Implant Electrodes: Nucleus® Hybrid™-L24 and Nucleus Freedom™ CI422 , 2014, Audiology and Neurotology.

[12]  A. Reymond,et al.  The transmembrane serine protease (TMPRSS3) mutated in deafness DFNB8/10 activates the epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) in vitro. , 2002, Human molecular genetics.

[13]  U. Aminov.  [Preliminary experiences]. , 1961, Aptechnoe delo.

[14]  Carolyn J. Brown,et al.  Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response: Growth of response with current level , 1991, Hearing Research.

[15]  B. Delprat,et al.  Tmprss3 loss of function impairs cochlear inner hair cell Kcnma1 channel membrane expression. , 2013, Human molecular genetics.

[16]  J. Ferraro,et al.  Tympanic ECochG and conventional ABR: a combined approach for the identification of wave I and the I-V interwave interval. , 1989, Ear and hearing.

[17]  S. Frisch,et al.  Multi-site diagnosis and management of 260 patients with Auditory Neuropathy/Dys-synchrony (Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder*) , 2010, International journal of audiology.

[18]  S. Merchant,et al.  Histopathology and molecular genetics of hearing loss in the human. , 2001, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.

[19]  P. Avan,et al.  Stereocilin-deficient mice reveal the origin of cochlear waveform distortions , 2008, Nature.

[20]  Kanthaiah Koka,et al.  Electrocochleography in Cochlear Implant Recipients With Residual Hearing: Comparison With Audiometric Thresholds , 2017, Ear and hearing.

[21]  A. Acharya,et al.  Using the Implant Electrode Array to Conduct Real-time Intraoperative Hearing Monitoring During Pediatric Cochlear Implantation: Preliminary Experiences , 2016, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[22]  Diana L. Kolbe,et al.  Comprehensive genetic testing in the clinical evaluation of 1119 patients with hearing loss , 2016, Human Genetics.

[23]  Jiajia Liu,et al.  miR-204 suppresses cochlear spiral ganglion neuron survival in vitro by targeting TMPRSS3 , 2014, Hearing Research.

[24]  G. E. Peterson,et al.  Revised CNC lists for auditory tests. , 1962, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[25]  Bruce J Gantz,et al.  Multicenter clinical trial of the Nucleus Hybrid S8 cochlear implant: Final outcomes , 2016, The Laryngoscope.

[26]  Kenneth R. Henry,et al.  Auditory nerve neurophonic recorded from the round window of the Mongolian gerbil , 1995, Hearing Research.

[27]  J. Fayad,et al.  Multichannel Cochlear Implants: Relation of Histopathology to Performance , 2006, The Laryngoscope.

[28]  Robert T. Dwyer,et al.  Intra- and Postoperative Electrocochleography May Be Predictive of Final Electrode Position and Postoperative Hearing Preservation , 2017, Front. Neurosci..

[29]  Xi Lin,et al.  Novel Mutations and Mutation Combinations of TMPRSS3 Cause Various Phenotypes in One Chinese Family with Autosomal Recessive Hearing Impairment , 2017, BioMed research international.

[30]  Paul J. Abbas,et al.  Intracochlear Recordings of Acoustically and Electrically Evoked Potentials in Nucleus Hybrid L24 Cochlear Implant Users and Their Relationship to Speech Perception , 2017, Front. Neurosci..

[31]  R. Ramponi,et al.  Clinical applications , 2007, Lasers in Medical Science.

[32]  J. Guinan,et al.  The Auditory Nerve Overlapped Waveform (ANOW) Originates in the Cochlear Apex , 2014, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[33]  Stephen O'Leary,et al.  Intraoperative Real-time Cochlear Response Telemetry Predicts Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implantation , 2016, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[34]  Shinsei Minoshima,et al.  Insertion of β-satellite repeats identifies a transmembrane protease causing both congenital and childhood onset autosomal recessive deafness , 2001, Nature Genetics.

[35]  Carolyn J. Brown,et al.  Genetic variants in the peripheral auditory system significantly affect adult cochlear implant performance , 2017, Hearing Research.

[36]  Christophe Loyez,et al.  A 4-fJ/Spike Artificial Neuron in 65 nm CMOS Technology , 2017, Front. Neurosci..

[37]  J. Jerger,et al.  Preferred Method For Clinical Determination Of Pure-Tone Thresholds , 1959 .

[38]  J. Ferraro,et al.  Electrocochleography: methods and clinical applications. , 1988, The American journal of otology.

[39]  Adam P. DeLuca,et al.  Advancing genetic testing for deafness with genomic technology , 2013, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[40]  Bruce J Gantz,et al.  Preservation of Hearing in Cochlear Implant Surgery: Advantages of Combined Electrical and Acoustical Speech Processing , 2005, The Laryngoscope.

[41]  J. J. Grote,et al.  Input/Output Curves to Tone Bursts and Clicks in Extratympanic and Transtympanic Electrocochleography , 1995, Ear and hearing.

[42]  J. Aran,et al.  Electrical Stimulation of the Ear: Clinical Applications , 1983, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[43]  T. Lenarz,et al.  European multi-centre study of the Nucleus Hybrid L24 cochlear implant , 2013, International journal of audiology.

[44]  M. Hoffer,et al.  Guidelines for Auditory Threshold Measurement for Significant Threshold Shift , 2016, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[45]  G. K. Yates,et al.  Outer hair cell receptor current and sensorineural hearing loss , 1989, Hearing Research.

[46]  J. Nadol,et al.  Intracochlear Inflammatory Response to Cochlear Implant Electrodes in Humans , 2014, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[47]  X. Estivill,et al.  An integrated genetic and functional analysis of the role of type II transmembrane serine proteases (TMPRSSs) in hearing loss , 2008, Human mutation.

[48]  J. Nadol,et al.  Within-Subject Comparison of Word Recognition and Spiral Ganglion Cell Count in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Recipients , 2014, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[49]  Carolyn J. Brown,et al.  The Relationship Between Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential and Speech Perception: A Study in Cochlear Implant Users With Short Electrode Array , 2010, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[50]  J. Nadol,et al.  Is Word Recognition Correlated With the Number of Surviving Spiral Ganglion Cells and Electrode Insertion Depth in Human Subjects With Cochlear Implants? , 2005, The Laryngoscope.

[51]  P J Abbas,et al.  Longitudinal Assessment of Physiological and Psychophysical Measures in Cochlear Implant Users , 1995, Ear and hearing.

[52]  W. Grolman,et al.  Systematic review of compound action potentials as predictors for cochlear implant performance , 2017, The Laryngoscope.

[53]  L. Farrer,et al.  Linkage of congenital recessive deafness (gene DFNB10) to chromosome 21q22.3. , 1996, American journal of human genetics.

[54]  C. Buchman,et al.  Distinguishing hair cell from neural potentials recorded at the round window. , 2014, Journal of neurophysiology.

[55]  S. Antonarakis,et al.  Tmprss3, a Transmembrane Serine Protease Deficient in Human DFNB8/10 Deafness, Is Critical for Cochlear Hair Cell Survival at the Onset of Hearing* , 2011, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[56]  H. Kojima,et al.  The Patients Associated With TMPRSS3 Mutations Are Good Candidates for Electric Acoustic Stimulation , 2015, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[57]  Bruce J. Gantz,et al.  United States multicenter clinical trial of the cochlear nucleus hybrid implant system , 2015, The Laryngoscope.

[58]  J. Fayad,et al.  Prognostic factors for hearing preservation in vestibular schwannoma surgery. , 2000, The American journal of otology.

[59]  Dongsup Kim,et al.  A novel mutation of TMPRSS3 related to milder auditory phenotype in Korean postlingual deafness: a possible future implication for a personalized auditory rehabilitation , 2014, Journal of Molecular Medicine.