The evolution of auditory dispersion in bidirectional constraint grammars*

This paper reconciles the standpoint that language users do not aim at improving their sound systems with the observation that languages seem to improve their sound systems. If learners optimise their perception by gradually ranking their cue constraints, and reuse the resulting ranking in production, they automatically introduce a PROTOTYPE EFFECT, which can be counteracted by an ARTICULATORY EFFECT. If the two effects are of unequal size, the learner will end up with a sound system auditorily different from that of her language environment. Computer simulations of sibilant inventories show that, independently of the initial auditory sound system, a stable equilibrium is reached within a small number of generations. In this stable state, the dispersion of the sibilants of the language strikes an optimal balance between articulatory ease and auditory contrast. Crucially, these results are derived within a model without any goal-oriented elements such as dispersion constraints.

[1]  Jean-Christophe Verstraete Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure , 2005 .

[2]  S. Rospond Gramatyka historyczna języka polskiego , 1971 .

[3]  B. Lindblom Phonetic Universals in Vowel Systems , 1986 .

[4]  A. House,et al.  The Influence of Consonant Environment upon the Secondary Acoustical Characteristics of Vowels , 1953 .

[5]  N. Isshiki Physiology of Speech Production , 1989 .

[6]  L. Raphael,et al.  Cross-sectional tongue shape and linguopalatal contact patterns in [s], [∫], [f], and [1] , 1992 .

[7]  Silke Hamann,et al.  Perceptual and acoustic cues of Polish coronal fricatives , 2003 .

[8]  Donca Steriade,et al.  Phonetically Based Phonology: List of abbreviations , 2004 .

[9]  P. Boersma,et al.  Empirical Tests of the Gradual Learning Algorithm , 2001, Linguistic Inquiry.

[10]  L. Raphael Preceding vowel duration as a cue to the perception of the voicing characteristic of word-final consonants in American English. , 1972, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Colin Humphries,et al.  Tonotopic organization of human auditory cortex , 2010, NeuroImage.

[12]  B. Moore,et al.  Suggested formulae for calculating auditory-filter bandwidths and excitation patterns. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  C. Darwin The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, Or, The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life , 2019 .

[14]  A. Bradlow,et al.  A comparative acoustic study of English and Spanish vowels. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Diana Apoussidou,et al.  The learnability of metrical phonology , 2007 .

[16]  P. Smolensky,et al.  Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar , 2004 .

[17]  Björn Lindblom,et al.  Explaining Phonetic Variation: A Sketch of the H&H Theory , 1990 .

[18]  Diana Apoussidou,et al.  On-line learning of underlying forms , 2006 .

[19]  P. Denes Effect of Duration on the Perception of Voicing , 1955 .

[20]  F. Lacerda,et al.  Memory Representations Generate The Perceptual-Magnet Effect , 2002 .

[21]  A. Jongman,et al.  Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  Keren Rice,et al.  Contrast in phonology : theory, perception, acquisition , 2008 .

[23]  William J. Hardcastle,et al.  Physiology of speech production: An introduction for speech scientists , 1976 .

[24]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Modelling the perceptual development of phonological contrasts with Optimality Theory and the Gradual Learning Algorithm. , 2003 .

[25]  P. Boersma,et al.  Learning to perceive a smaller L2 vowel inventory: an Optimality Theory account , 2008 .

[26]  No Value Proceedings of the 14th international congress of phonetic sciences , 2000 .

[27]  Peter Ladefoged,et al.  Places of articulation: an investigation of Pekingese fricatives and affricates , 1984 .

[28]  Jeff Mielke,et al.  The Emergence of Distinctive Features , 2008 .

[29]  P. Boersma How we learn variation, optionality and probalility , 1997 .

[30]  S. Manuel,et al.  The role of contrast in limiting vowel-to-vowel coarticulation in different languages. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  D. Pisoni,et al.  The Handbook of Speech Perception , 2004 .

[33]  Jaye Padgett,et al.  The Emergence of Contrastive Palatalization in Russian , 2003 .

[34]  Keith Johnson,et al.  The Role of Speech Perception in Phonology , 2001 .

[35]  Mirjam Broersma,et al.  Perception of familiar contrasts in unfamiliar positions. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  P. Luce,et al.  Contextual effects on vowel duration, closure duration, and the consonant/vowel ratio in speech production. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  Jaye Padgett Russian Vowel Reduction and Dispersion Theory , 2004 .

[38]  Jaye Padgett,et al.  The Evolution of Sibilants in Polish and Russian , 2003 .

[39]  D. Eric Holt,et al.  Optimality Theory and Language Change , 2003 .

[40]  Gerhard Jäger,et al.  Learning Constraint Subhierarchies: The Bidirectional Gradual Learning Algorithm , 2004 .

[41]  Peter Ladefoged,et al.  Vowels and Consonants , 2000, Manchu Grammar.

[42]  Joe Pater Gradual Learning and Convergence , 2008, Linguistic Inquiry.

[43]  Reinhard Blutner,et al.  Some Aspects of Optimality in Natural Language Interpretation , 2000, J. Semant..

[44]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Cue constraints and their interactions in phonological perception and production , 2009 .

[45]  Mark Richard Lauersdorf,et al.  Introduction to the Phonological History of the Slavic Languages , 1991 .

[46]  Pawel M. Nowak The role of vowel transitions and frication noise in the perception of Polish sibilants , 2006, J. Phonetics.

[47]  J. Schwartz,et al.  The Dispersion-Focalization Theory of vowel systems , 1997 .

[48]  I. Mees,et al.  A phonetic description of the consonant system of Standard Dutch (ABN) , 1982, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

[49]  Markus Fischer A Robbins-Monro type learning algorithm for an entropy maximizing version of stochastic Optimality Theory , 2005 .

[50]  Gerhard Jäger,et al.  Maximum Entropy Models and Stochastic Optimality Theory , 2003 .

[51]  D. Steriade,et al.  Chapter 1 Introduction : The Phonetic Bases of Phonological Markedness , 2003 .

[52]  David Bamman,et al.  Proceedings of the 30th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development , 2006 .

[53]  A. Wedel Exemplar models, evolution and language change , 2006 .

[54]  Matthew Gordon,et al.  A cross-linguistic acoustic study of voiceless fricatives , 2002, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

[55]  P. Ladefoged,et al.  Phonetic linguistics : essays in honor of Peter Ladefoged , 1987 .

[56]  Ian Maddieson,et al.  Patterns of sounds , 1986 .

[57]  Jaye Padgett,et al.  Contrast Dispersion and Russian Palatalization , 2002 .

[58]  Henk Zeevat,et al.  Optimality Theory and Pragmatics , 2003 .

[59]  Wim Zonneveld,et al.  Constraints in Phonological Acquisition , 2009 .

[60]  A. Marchal,et al.  Speech production and speech modelling , 1990 .

[61]  P. Milenkovic,et al.  Statistical analysis of word-initial voiceless obstruents: preliminary data. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[62]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Some listener-oriented accounts of h-aspiré in French , 2007 .

[63]  R. Nosofsky Exemplar-Based Accounts of Relations Between Classification, Recognition, and Typicality , 1988 .

[64]  B. Lindblom,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Vowel Quality Systems: The Role of Perceptual Contrast , 1972 .

[65]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Convergence properties of a gradual learner in Harmonic Grammar , 2008 .

[66]  J. Kruschke,et al.  ALCOVE: an exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. , 1992, Psychological review.

[67]  Bruce Tesar,et al.  An Iterative Strategy for Learning Metrical Stress in Optimality Theory , 1996 .

[68]  Henk Zeevat,et al.  A Reinterpretation of Syntactic Alignment , 2002 .

[69]  A. A. Leontʹev,et al.  Selected works : articles on general linguistics , 1974 .

[70]  Susan A. Dart,et al.  WPP, No. 79: Articulatory and Acoustic Properties of Apical and Laminal Articulations , 1991 .

[71]  Sharon Goldwater,et al.  Proceedings of the Workshop on Variation within Optimality Theory , 2003 .

[72]  Donca Steriade,et al.  Phonetically Based Phonology: Introduction: the phonetic bases of phonological Markedness , 2004 .

[73]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Recognizing Spoken Words: The Neighborhood Activation Model , 1998, Ear and hearing.

[74]  J. Mullennix,et al.  Talker Variability in Speech Processing , 1997 .

[75]  P. Smolensky On the comprehension/production dilemma in child language , 1996 .

[76]  D. F. Hoyt,et al.  Gait and the energetics of locomotion in horses , 1981, Nature.

[77]  Walter Daelemans,et al.  Learnability in Optimality Theory , 2000, Linguistic Inquiry.

[78]  Edward Flemming,et al.  The relationship between coronal place and vowel backness , 2003, Phonology.

[79]  Edward Flemming Speech Perception and Phonological Contrast , 2008 .

[80]  Andrew B Wedel,et al.  Self-organization and categorical behavior in phonology , 2003 .

[81]  Mark Johnson,et al.  Learning OT constraint rankings using a maximum entropy model , 2003 .

[82]  R-M. S. Heffner,et al.  Notes on the Length of Vowels (III) , 1940 .

[83]  Robert Kirchner,et al.  Phonetically Based Phonology , 2008 .

[84]  R. Fisher,et al.  On the Mathematical Foundations of Theoretical Statistics , 1922 .

[85]  Juliette Blevins,et al.  Evolutionary Phonology: The Emergence of Sound Patterns , 2004 .

[86]  T Gay,et al.  The Activity of the Intrinsic Laryngeal Muscles in Voicing Control , 1972, Phonetica.

[87]  M. Gordon Syllable Weight: Phonetics, Phonology, Typology , 2006 .

[88]  Joe Pater,et al.  Bridging the Gap Between Receptive and Productive Development with Minimally Violable Constraints , 2004 .

[89]  P. Ladefoged,et al.  The sounds of the world's languages , 1996 .

[90]  S. Hamann Retroflex fricatives in Slavic languages , 2004, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

[91]  P. Boersma,et al.  BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN L2 SPEECH PERCEPTION RESEARCH AND PHONOLOGICAL THEORY , 2004, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[92]  Robert Kirchner,et al.  An Effort Based Approach to Consonant Lenition , 2001 .

[93]  Robert Nathaniel Sanders,et al.  Opacity and Sound Change in the Polish Lexicon , 2003 .

[94]  Edward Flemming,et al.  Auditory Representations in Phonology , 2002 .

[95]  E. C. Hills,et al.  Manual de Pronunciacion Espanola , 1926 .

[96]  John J. McCarthy,et al.  A Thematic Guide to Optimality Theory , 2001 .

[97]  L Nyström,et al.  Statistical Analysis , 2008, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[98]  Bridget Samuels,et al.  On Evolutionary Phonology , 2007, Biolinguistics.

[99]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure , 2001 .

[100]  Silke Hamann,et al.  The phonetics and phonology of retroflexes , 2003 .

[101]  B H Repp,et al.  Two strategies in fricative discrimination , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[102]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Learning abstract phonological from auditory phonetic catergories: an integrated model for the acquisition of language-specific sound categories , 2003 .

[103]  Jaye Padgett,et al.  Contrast and Post-Velar Fronting in Russian , 2003 .

[104]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[105]  M. Schlesewsky,et al.  Gradience in grammar : generative perspectives , 2006 .

[106]  A. Bennett The Origin of Species by means of Natural Selection; or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life , 1872, Nature.

[107]  John‐Dongwook Choi,et al.  An acoustic study of Kabardian vowels , 1991, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

[108]  Peter Ladefoged,et al.  Phonetic Structures of Scottish Gaelic , 1998, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

[109]  Joan Bresnan,et al.  Architectures, rules, and preferences : variations on themes by Joan W. Bresnan , 2007 .

[110]  Stanisław Puppel,et al.  A handbook of Polish pronunciation for English learners , 1977 .

[111]  Bruce Tesar,et al.  Learning phonotactic distributions , 2004 .

[112]  Edward Flemming,et al.  DRAFT 5 / 9 / 06 1 The role of distinctiveness constraints in phonology , 2006 .

[113]  Edward Flemming Contrast and Perceptual Distinctiveness , 2003 .

[114]  D. LeBihan,et al.  Phonological Grammar Shapes the Auditory Cortex: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[115]  J. Mehler,et al.  Epenthetic vowels in Japanese: A perceptual illusion? , 1999, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.

[116]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Prototypicality judgments as inverted perception , 2006 .

[117]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Review of Tesar & Smolensky(2000); Learnability in Optimality Theory [Review of: B. Tesar, Smolensky (2000) Learnability in Optimality Theory] , 2003 .

[118]  Pétur Helgason,et al.  Distinctive (voice) does not Imply Regressive Assimilation: Evidence from Swedish , 2004 .

[119]  P. Keating,et al.  Patterns in allophone distribution for voiced and voiceless stops , 1983 .

[120]  M. Dillon.,et al.  The Dialects of the Outer Hebrides = A Linguistic Survey of the Gaelic Dialects of Scotland , 1942 .

[121]  R. Jakobson Kindersprache, Aphasie und allgemeine Lautgesetze , 1942 .

[122]  A. Wedel Feedback and regularity in the lexicon* , 2007, Phonology.

[123]  B Hutters,et al.  Vocal Fold Adjustments in Aspirated and Unaspirated Stops in Danish , 1985, Phonetica.

[124]  Richard Wright,et al.  The Hyperspace Effect: Phonetic Targets Are Hyperarticulated. , 1993 .