Benchmarking Industrial Design Services

In this benchmark study, we seek to identify strategies, operating practices, and philosophies employed by some of today's best-regarded industrial design consultancy firms in both the USA and Europe. In addition, we attempt to map important trends in the field of design. To reach our objectives we compare the design practice of design consultancy firms with a strong reputation and highly esteemed client base with competitors lacking these assets. In total, we interviewed 50 well-regarded and little-known industrial design firms operating in the Netherlands, Germany, Italy, the UK and the USA. Additional information was obtained by interviewing clients of professional design services and industry experts. The findings of our benchmark study indicate that design consultancy firms face new competitive challenges, among other things, due to convergence of related markets, the challenges of the globalization process and the influence of new information and communication technologies that allow firms to exploit economies of scale and scope. Our research further identified six factors that seem critical for success in present-day design consultancy, namely being a full design service provider or niche player, maintaining excellent long-term client relationships and achieving customer satisfaction, having an entrepreneurial attitude, having an interdisciplinary and multicultural orientation, maintaining a strong focus on building and sustaining an excellent image and finally engaging in a cycle of continuous learning.

[1]  Jerome P. Finnigan The Manager's Guide to Benchmarking: Essential Skills for the New Competitive-Cooperative Economy , 1996 .

[2]  D. Campbell The Informant in Quantitative Research , 1955, American Journal of Sociology.

[3]  Robert T. Averitt The Economics and Management of Intellectual Property: Towards Intellectual Capitalism , 2000 .

[4]  M. Alvesson Talking in Organizations: Managing Identity and Impressions in an Advertising Agency , 1994 .

[5]  Carol J. McNair,et al.  Benchmarking : A Tool for Continuous Improvement , 1992 .

[6]  Margaret Bruce,et al.  WINNING BY DESIGN , 1992 .

[7]  Earl R. Babbie,et al.  The practice of social research , 1969 .

[8]  S. Winter,et al.  Understanding corporate coherence: Theory and evidence , 1994 .

[9]  L. Phillips Assessing Measurement Error in Key Informant Reports: A Methodological Note on Organizational Analysis in Marketing , 1981 .

[10]  M. D. Jong Service Industries: Innovation and Internationalization , 1993 .

[11]  Rachel Cooper,et al.  Requirements capture as process of technology- market integration , 1999 .

[12]  Charles J. Fombrun,et al.  Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image , 1996 .

[13]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Inter-firm alliances: Analysis and design , 1999 .

[14]  Peter R. Dickson,et al.  Managing design in small high-growth companies , 1995 .

[15]  Henry Mintzberg Musings on management. Ten ideas designed to rile everyone who cares about management. , 1996, Harvard business review.

[16]  Arjen van Witteloostuijn,et al.  Human capital, social capital, and firm dissolution , 1998 .

[17]  G. Gemser,et al.  How integrating industrial design in the product development process impacts on company performance , 2001 .

[18]  Sibylle Kicherer,et al.  Olivetti: A Study of the Corporate Management of Design , 1990 .

[19]  Birgit Helene Jevnaker,et al.  Championing Design: Perspectives on Design Capabilities , 2000 .

[20]  Jens Frøslev Christensen Asset profiles for technological innovation , 1995 .

[21]  Margaret Bruce,et al.  Challenges and trends facing the UK design profession , 1996 .

[22]  Gianni Lorenzoni,et al.  Creating a Strategic Center to Manage a Web of Partners , 1995 .

[23]  Book Review:Intelligence in the United States: A Survey-With Conclusions for Manpower Utilization in Education and Employment. John B. Miner , 1957 .

[24]  Michael J. Spendolini,et al.  The Benchmarking Book , 1992 .