Motion and texture shape cues modulate perceived material properties.

Specular and matte surfaces can project identical images if the surface geometry and light field are appropriately configured. Our previous work has shown that the visual system can exploit stereopsis and contour cues to 3D shape to disambiguate different surface reflectance interpretations. Here, we test whether material perception depends on information about surface geometry provided by structure from motion and shape from texture. Different surface textures were superimposed on a fixed pattern of luminance gradients to generate two different 3D shape interpretations. Each shape interpretation of the luminance gradients promoted a different experience of surface reflectance and illumination direction, which varied from a specular surface in frontal illumination to a comparatively matte surface in grazing illumination. The shape that appeared most specular exhibited the steepest derivatives of luminance with respect to surface orientation, consistent with physical differences between specular and diffuse reflectance. The effect of apparent shape on perceived reflectance occurred for a variety of surface textures that provided either structure from motion, shape from texture, or both optical sources of shape information. In conjunction with previous findings (Marlow, Todorović, & Anderson, 2015; Marlow & Anderson, 2015), these results suggest that any cue that provides sufficient information about 3D shape can also be used to derive material properties from the rate that luminance varies as a function of surface curvature.

[1]  D. Knill,et al.  Apparent surface curvature affects lightness perception , 1991, Nature.

[2]  J T Todd,et al.  Simulation of curved surfaces from patterns of optical texture. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  Maria Olkkonen,et al.  Perceived glossiness and lightness under real-world illumination. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[4]  E. Adelson,et al.  Image statistics and the perception of surface qualities , 2007, Nature.

[5]  Shree K. Nayar,et al.  A Theory of Specular Surface Geometry , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[6]  B. Anderson,et al.  Specular Image Structure Modulates the Perception of Three-Dimensional Shape , 2014, Current Biology.

[7]  Sylvia C Pont,et al.  Illusory gloss on Lambertian surfaces. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[8]  Hiroshi Ando,et al.  Effects of head motion and stereo viewing on perceived glossiness. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[9]  Barton L Anderson,et al.  Generative constraints on image cues for perceived gloss. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[10]  Isamu Motoyoshi,et al.  Variability in constancy of the perceived surface reflectance across different illumination statistics , 2012, Vision Research.

[11]  Barton L Anderson,et al.  The dark side of gloss , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  H. Wallach,et al.  The kinetic depth effect. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  Donald P. Greenberg,et al.  Toward a psychophysically-based light reflection model for image synthesis , 2000, SIGGRAPH.

[14]  S. Ullman The interpretation of structure from motion , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[15]  Barton L. Anderson,et al.  Material properties derived from three-dimensional shape representations , 2015, Vision Research.

[16]  Dejan Todorović How shape from contours affects shape from shading , 2014, Vision Research.

[17]  E. Mingolla,et al.  Perception of surface curvature and direction of illumination from patterns of shading. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  J. Koenderink,et al.  Photometric Invariants Related to Solid Shape , 1980 .

[19]  Barton L Anderson,et al.  Image statistics and the perception of surface gloss and lightness. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[20]  Paul R. Schrater,et al.  Rapid classification of specular and diffuse reflection from image velocities , 2011, Pattern Recognit..

[21]  Vebjørn Ekroll,et al.  Disparity, motion, and color information improve gloss constancy performance. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[22]  Hideko F. Norman,et al.  Visual discrimination of local surface structure: Slant, tilt, and curvedness , 2006, Vision Research.

[23]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[24]  Barton L. Anderson,et al.  Coupled computations of three-dimensional shape and material , 2015, Current Biology.

[25]  M. Landy,et al.  Conjoint Measurement of Gloss and Surface Texture , 2008, Psychological science.

[26]  Paul R. Schrater,et al.  Visual Motion and the Perception of Surface Material , 2011, Current Biology.

[27]  J. Todd,et al.  The perception of surface curvature from optical motion , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  Junyu Dong,et al.  Why do rough surfaces appear glossy? , 2014, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[29]  Jonas Gårding,et al.  Shape from texture for smooth curved surfaces in perspective projection , 1992, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[30]  Philip Dutré,et al.  The influence of shape on the perception of material reflectance , 2007, SIGGRAPH 2007.

[31]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[32]  David H Brainard,et al.  Joint effects of illumination geometry and object shape in the perception of surface reflectance , 2011, i-Perception.

[33]  S. Nishida,et al.  Use of image-based information in judgments of surface-reflectance properties. , 1998, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[34]  Katja Doerschner,et al.  Effects of surface reflectance and 3D shape on perceived rotation axis. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[35]  Phillip J. Marlow,et al.  The Perception and Misperception of Specular Surface Reflectance , 2012, Current Biology.

[36]  V. S. Ramachandran,et al.  Perception of shape from shading , 1988, Nature.

[37]  J T Todd,et al.  Visual discrimination of local surface depth and orientation , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[38]  James T. Todd,et al.  The perception of surface orientation from multiple sources of optical information , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[39]  J J Koenderink,et al.  What Does the Occluding Contour Tell Us about Solid Shape? , 1984, Perception.

[40]  Barton L Anderson,et al.  Image statistics do not explain the perception of gloss and lightness. , 2009, Journal of vision.