Intranasal M2SR (M2-Deficient Single Replication) H3N2 Influenza Vaccine Provides Enhanced Mucosal and Serum Antibodies in Adults

Abstract Background We previously demonstrated that an intranasal dose of 108 50% tissue culture infectious dose (TCID50) M2-deficient single replication (M2SR) influenza vaccine protected against highly drifted H3N2 influenza challenge in a subset of subjects who demonstrated ≥2-fold increase in microneutralization (MN) antibodies to Belgium2015 (the challenge strain) after vaccination. Here, we describe a phase 1b, observer-blinded, dose-escalation study demonstrating an increased proportion of responders with this signal of immune protection. Methods Serosusceptible subjects aged 18–49 years were randomized to receive 2 doses (108–109 TCID50) of M2SR or placebo administered 28 days apart. Clinical specimens were collected before and after each dose. The primary objective was to demonstrate safety of M2SR vaccines. Results The vaccine was well tolerated at all dose levels. Against Belgium2015, ≥ 2-fold increases in MN antibodies were noted among 40% (95% confidence interval [CI], 24.9%–56.7%) of subjects following a single 108 TCID50 M2SR dose and among 80.6% (95% CI, 61.4%–92.3%) after 109 dose (P < .001). A single 109 TCID50 dose of M2SR generated ≥4-fold hemagglutination inhibition antibody seroconversion against the vaccine strain in 71% (95% CI, 52.0%–85.8%) of recipients. Mucosal and cellular immune responses were also induced. Conclusions These results indicate that M2SR may provide substantial protection against infection with highly drifted strains of H3N2 influenza. Clinical Trials Registration NCT03999554.

[1]  G. Neumann,et al.  Safety and Immunogenicity of M2-Deficient, Single Replication, Live Influenza Vaccine (M2SR) in Adults , 2021, Vaccines.

[2]  G. Neumann,et al.  M2-Deficient Single-Replication Influenza Vaccine–Induced Immune Responses Associated With Protection Against Human Challenge With Highly Drifted H3N2 Influenza Strain , 2021, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[3]  E. Belongia,et al.  Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness: Defining the H3N2 Problem. , 2019, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[4]  A. Manenti,et al.  How to assess the effectiveness of nasal influenza vaccines? Role and measurement of sIgA in mucosal secretions , 2019, Influenza and other respiratory viruses.

[5]  G. Neumann,et al.  Novel influenza vaccine M2SR protects against drifted H1N1 and H3N2 influenza virus challenge in ferrets with pre-existing immunity. , 2018, Vaccine.

[6]  R. Cox,et al.  Immune responses after live attenuated influenza vaccination , 2018, Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics.

[7]  G. Neumann,et al.  M2SR, a novel live influenza vaccine, protects mice and ferrets against highly pathogenic avian influenza. , 2017, Vaccine.

[8]  Shinji Watanabe,et al.  M2SR, a novel live single replication influenza virus vaccine, provides effective heterosubtypic protection in mice. , 2016, Vaccine.

[9]  J. Oxford,et al.  Preexisting influenza-specific CD4+ T cells correlate with disease protection against influenza challenge in humans , 2012, Nature Medicine.

[10]  R. Belshe,et al.  The relative efficacy of trivalent live attenuated and inactivated influenza vaccines in children and adults , 2010, Influenza and other respiratory viruses.

[11]  R. Karron,et al.  Evaluation of two live attenuated cold-adapted H5N1 influenza virus vaccines in healthy adults. , 2009, Vaccine.

[12]  M. Jaimes,et al.  Baseline Levels of Influenza-Specific CD4 Memory T-Cells Affect T-Cell Responses to Influenza Vaccines , 2008, PloS one.

[13]  R. Walker,et al.  Comparative Immunogenicities of Frozen and Refrigerated Formulations of Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine in Healthy Subjects , 2007, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[14]  Lihan K. Yan,et al.  Correlates of immune protection induced by live, attenuated, cold-adapted, trivalent, intranasal influenza virus vaccine. , 2000, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[15]  R. Betts,et al.  Evaluation of trivalent, live, cold-adapted (CAIV-T) and inactivated (TIV) influenza vaccines in prevention of virus infection and illness following challenge of adults with wild-type influenza A (H1N1), A (H3N2), and B viruses. , 1999, Vaccine.

[16]  B. Murphy,et al.  Serum and nasal wash antibodies associated with resistance to experimental challenge with influenza A wild-type virus , 1986, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[17]  A. S. Beare,et al.  The role of serum haemagglutination-inhibiting antibody in protection against challenge infection with influenza A2 and B viruses , 1972, Epidemiology and Infection.

[18]  X. Wu,et al.  An integrated multi-study analysis of serum HAI antibody responses to Ann Arbor strain live attenuated influenza vaccine in children and adults , 2014 .

[19]  Nicholas S. Kelley,et al.  Efficacy and effectiveness of influenza vaccines: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2012, The Lancet. Infectious diseases.

[20]  Recommended composition of influenza virus vaccines for use in the 2011-2012 northern hemisphere influenza season. , 2011, Releve epidemiologique hebdomadaire.

[21]  B. Murphy,et al.  Principles underlying the development and use of live attenuated cold-adapted influenza A and B virus vaccines. , 2002, Viral immunology.

[22]  G. Duvel The study group. , 1980 .