The existence of R&D spillovers: A cost function estimation with random coefficients

This is a study of the effects of R&D spillovers on the cost and production structures of Finnish manufacturing firms. Confidential data on firms is used to estimate a translog cost function system with random coefficients. Although the results suggest that intra-industry spillovers are present in Finnish manufacturing, the findings regarding inter-industry spillovers are inconclusive. The variable cost reduction associated with spillovers is positive, but relatively low. Spillovers reduce the demand for labor but increase the demand for materials. Spillovers also reduce the willingness to pay for capital inputs.

[1]  I. Prucha,et al.  Dynamic Factor Demand Models and Productivity Analysis , 1999 .

[2]  J. Bernstein Interindustry R&D Spillovers for Electrical and Electronic Products: The Canadian Case , 1997 .

[3]  J. Bernstein,et al.  International R&D Spillovers between Canadian and Japanese Industries , 1995 .

[4]  Pierre Mohnen,et al.  International R&D Spillovers between U.S. And Japanese R&D Intensive Sectors , 1994 .

[5]  M. Nadiri,et al.  Innovations and Technological Spillovers , 1993 .

[6]  E. Helpman,et al.  International R&D Spillovers , 1993, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[7]  G. Grossman,et al.  Innovation and growth in the global economy , 1993 .

[8]  Ernst R. Berndt,et al.  The Practice of Econometrics: Classic and Contemporary. , 1992 .

[9]  Z. Griliches The Search for R&D Spillovers , 1991 .

[10]  P. Mohnen,et al.  R&D, R&D spillovers and payments for technology: Canadian evidence , 1991 .

[11]  J. Bernstein,et al.  Product Demand, Cost of Production, Spillovers, and the Social Rate of Return to R&D , 1991 .

[12]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[13]  J. Bernstein,et al.  The Structure of Canadian Inter-industry R&D Spillovers, and the Rates of Return to R&D , 1989 .

[14]  J. Bernstein Costs of Production, Intra- and Interindustry R&D Spillovers: Canadian Evidence , 1988 .

[15]  M. Nadiri,et al.  Interindustry R&D Spillovers, Rates of Return, and Production in High-Tech Industries , 1988 .

[16]  B. Dixon,et al.  Usefulness of Pretests for Estimating Underlying Technologies Using Dual Profit Functions , 1987 .

[17]  J. Bernstein,et al.  Research and Development and Intraindustry Spillovers: an Empirical Application of Dynamic Duality , 1986 .

[18]  D. Jorgenson,et al.  TRANSCENDENTAL LOGARITHMIC PRODUCTION FRONTIERS , 1973 .

[19]  H. Uzawa,et al.  Production Functions with Constant Elasticities of Substitution , 1962 .

[20]  Walter Diewert,et al.  Duality approaches to microeconomic theory , 1993 .

[21]  Kazuyuki Suzuki,et al.  R&D spillovers and technology transfer among and within vertical keiretsu groups: Evidence from the Japanese electrical machinery industry , 1993 .

[22]  A. C. Chiang Elements of Dynamic Optimization , 1992 .

[23]  John C. Panzar,et al.  Technological determinants of firm and industry structure , 1989 .

[24]  D. Jorgenson Econometric Methods for Modeling Producer Behavior , 1986 .

[25]  A. Daughety,et al.  On the estimation of returns to scale using variable cost functions , 1983 .

[26]  Douglas W. Caves,et al.  Productivity Growth, Scale Economies, and Capacity Utilization in U.S. Railroads, 1955-74 , 1981 .

[27]  K. Arrow Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention , 1962 .

[28]  W. E.,et al.  Mathematical Analysis for Economists , 1938, Nature.

[29]  P. Romer Endogenous Technological Change Endogenous Technological Change , 2022 .