Affordances in the design of enactive systems

Enactive interfaces must incorporate intuitive activity that characterizes naturalistic perception. However, the manner in which information is presented is not more important than the contents: what information is presented. In this contribution, we address the contents of perception. We argue that people perceive affordances, that is, the possible actions that are available in any given situation. We further argue that enactive interfaces should be designed to optimize presentation of information about the possible actions that are available to a person using the enactive interface. The design of enactive interfaces might be guided by an extension of the theory of ecological interface design (Vicente in Hum Factors 44:62–78, 2002) to include multimodal information that is accessed through fast, intuitive exploratory movement. We review two empirical studies that illustrate our arguments. Careful analysis of affordances, together with our increasing understanding of the enactive perception of affordances, should influence the design of enactive interfaces.

[1]  T. Stoffregen Affordances as Properties of the Animal-Environment System , 2003, How Shall Affordances be Refined? Four Perspectives.

[2]  A. Chemero An Outline of a Theory of Affordances , 2003, How Shall Affordances be Refined? Four Perspectives.

[3]  Kim J. Vicente,et al.  Ecological Interface Design: Progress and Challenges , 2002, Hum. Factors.

[4]  D. Lewkowicz,et al.  A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. , 2007, Journal of cognitive neuroscience.

[5]  Thomas A. Stoffregen,et al.  Affordances Are Enough: Reply to Chemero et al. (2003) , 2003 .

[6]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[7]  G. Bingham,et al.  Hefting for a maximum distance throw: a smart perceptual mechanism. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  W H Warren,et al.  Perceiving affordances: visual guidance of stair climbing. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  T. Stoffregen,et al.  Perceiving affordances for another person's actions. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  A. Yonas,et al.  Perceiving the affordance of contact in four- and five-month-old infants. , 1993, Child development.

[11]  E. Reed The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1989 .

[12]  M. Turvey Affordances and Prospective Control: An Outline of the Ontology , 1992 .

[13]  J. Konczak,et al.  Changing affordances in stair climbing: the perception of maximum climbability in young and older adults. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  T. Stoffregen,et al.  On specification and the senses , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[15]  J. Sanders An Ontology of Affordances , 1997 .

[16]  J. Thomson,et al.  Studies in perception and action V , 1999 .

[17]  Benoît G. Bardy,et al.  Affordance Judgments and Nonlocomotor Body Movement , 2005 .

[18]  F. C. Bakker,et al.  The relevance of action in perceiving affordances: perception of catchableness of fly balls. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  James A. Balliett,et al.  What an actor must do in order to perceive the affordance for sitting. , 1990 .