Fitting Probability Distributions to Animal Movement Trajectories: Using Artificial Neural Networks to Link Distance, Resources, and Memory

Animal movement paths are often thought of as a confluence of behavioral processes and landscape patterns. Yet it has proven difficult to develop frameworks for analyzing animal movement that can test these interactions. Here we describe a novel method for fitting movement models to data that can incorporate diverse aspects of landscapes and behavior. Using data from five elk (Cervus canadensis) reintroduced to central Ontario, we employed artificial neural networks to estimate movement probability kernels as functions of three landscape‐behavioral processes. These consisted of measures of the animals’ response to the physical spatial structure of the landscape, the spatial variability in resources, and memory of previously visited locations. The results support the view that animal movement results from interactions among elements of landscape structure and behavior, motivating context‐dependent movement probabilities, rather than from successive realizations of static distributions, as some traditional models of movement and resource selection assume. Flexible, nonlinear models may thus prove useful in understanding the mechanisms controlling animal movement patterns.

[1]  Chris J. Johnson,et al.  Movement parameters of ungulates and scale‐specific responses to the environment , 2002 .

[2]  Peter Kareiva,et al.  Spatial ecology : the role of space in population dynamics and interspecific interactions , 1998 .

[3]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  Scale and heterogeneity in habitat selection by elk in Yellowstone National Park , 2003 .

[4]  John W. Kern,et al.  DAILY AND SEASONAL MOVEMENTS AND HABITAT USE BY FEMALE ROCKY MOUNTAIN ELK AND MULE DEER , 2003 .

[5]  Run Yu,et al.  Predicting shrimp growth: Artificial neural network versus nonlinear regression models , 2006 .

[6]  Daniel Fortin,et al.  Adaptive models for large herbivore movements in heterogeneous landscapes , 2005, Landscape Ecology.

[7]  York Winter,et al.  Hierarchical strategy for relocating food targets in flower bats: spatial memory versus cue-directed search , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[8]  E. Charnov Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. , 1976, Theoretical population biology.

[9]  R. N. Hughes,et al.  Foraging Behaviour and Memory Window in Sticklebacks , 1995 .

[10]  R D,et al.  Costs of Memory: Ideas and Predictions , 1999 .

[11]  K D Farnsworth,et al.  How Do Grazers Achieve Their Distribution? A Continuum of Models from Random Diffusion to the Ideal Free Distribution Using Biased Random Walks , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[12]  Brian D. Ripley,et al.  Neural Networks and Related Methods for Classification , 1994 .

[13]  Daniel Grünbaum,et al.  Advection–diffusion equations for generalized tactic searching behaviors , 1999 .

[14]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Towards a behavioral ecology of ecological landscapes. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[15]  Simon Benhamou,et al.  On systems of reference involved in spatial memory , 1997, Behavioural Processes.

[16]  J. G. Skellam Random dispersal in theoretical populations , 1951, Biometrika.

[17]  John F. Wilmshurst,et al.  PREDICTIVE MODELS OF MOVEMENT BY SERENGETI GRAZERS , 2004 .

[18]  P. Driessche,et al.  Dispersal data and the spread of invading organisms. , 1996 .

[19]  Wei Zhang,et al.  “True” self-attracting walk , 2001 .

[20]  Simon Benhamou,et al.  Spatial memory and searching efficiency , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[21]  Geir Huse,et al.  Implementing behaviour in individual-based models using neural networks and genetic algorithms , 1999, Evolutionary Ecology.

[22]  Sheng-You Huang,et al.  Random walk with memory enhancement and decay. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[23]  P. Moorcroft,et al.  Mechanistic home range analysis , 2006 .

[24]  Paul Graham,et al.  Route learning by insects , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[25]  P. Turchin Quantitative analysis of movement : measuring and modeling population redistribution in animals and plants , 1998 .

[26]  V. V. Krishnan,et al.  SEARCH COSTS AND HABITAT SELECTION BY DISPERSERS , 2005 .

[27]  L. Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  Complexity, pattern, and evolutionary trade-offs in animal aggregation. , 1999, Science.

[28]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach , 2001 .

[29]  D B Dusenbery,et al.  Efficiency and the role of adaptation in klinokinesis. , 1989, Journal of theoretical biology.

[30]  B. Manly,et al.  Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies. , 1994 .

[31]  Kenji Doya,et al.  Evolution of Neural Architecture Fitting Environmental Dynamics , 2005, Adapt. Behav..

[32]  Akira Okubo Introduction: The Mathematics of Ecological Diffusion , 2001 .

[33]  P. Kareiva,et al.  Analyzing insect movement as a correlated random walk , 1983, Oecologia.

[34]  Daniel Gru,et al.  Advection—di⁄usion equations for generalized tactic searching behaviors , 1999 .

[35]  Peter Turchin,et al.  Translating Foraging Movements in Heterogeneous Environments into the Spatial Distribution of Foragers , 1991 .

[36]  Paul G. Blackwell,et al.  Random diffusion models for animal movement , 1997 .

[37]  A I Houston,et al.  Memory and the efficient use of information. , 1987, Journal of theoretical biology.

[38]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning representations by back-propagating errors , 1986, Nature.

[39]  M. Mendl,et al.  Pigs in space: spatial memory and its susceptibility to interference , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[40]  Juan M. Morales,et al.  EXTRACTING MORE OUT OF RELOCATION DATA: BUILDING MOVEMENT MODELS AS MIXTURES OF RANDOM WALKS , 2004 .

[41]  Simon Benhamou,et al.  A comparative analysis of spatial memory processes , 1995, Behavioural Processes.

[42]  STEVEN W. BUSKIRK,et al.  Metrics for Studies of Resource Selection , 2006 .

[43]  Daniel A. Ashlock,et al.  Evolutionary computation for modeling and optimization , 2005 .

[44]  C. Patlak Random walk with persistence and external bias , 1953 .

[45]  R. Hughes,et al.  Algorithmic behaviour and spatial memory are used by two intertidal fish species to solve the radial maze , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[46]  C. Janson Experimental evidence for spatial memory in foraging wild capuchin monkeys, Cebus apella , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[47]  David R. C. Hill,et al.  Multi-agent simulation of group foraging in sheep: effects of spatial memory, conspecific attraction and plot size , 2001 .

[48]  Rüdiger Wehner,et al.  Landmark memories are more robust when acquired at the nest site than en route: experiments in desert ants , 2003, Naturwissenschaften.

[49]  ANDREW T. HURLY,et al.  Spatial memory in rufous hummingbirds: memory for rewarded and non-rewarded sites , 1996, Animal Behaviour.

[50]  B. Kendall,et al.  WHY DO POPULATIONS CYCLE? A SYNTHESIS OF STATISTICAL AND MECHANISTIC MODELING APPROACHES , 1999 .

[51]  P. Yodzis,et al.  Diffusion-limited predator-prey dynamics in Euclidean environments: an allometric individual-based model. , 2000, Theoretical population biology.

[52]  R. O'Neill,et al.  Landscape Ecology Explained@@@Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice: Pattern and Process , 2001 .

[53]  J. Lachaud,et al.  Spatio-temporal learning by the ant ectatomma ruidum , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[54]  David J. Mladenoff,et al.  Predicting gray wolf landscape recolonization: logistic regression models vs. new field data , 1999 .

[55]  L. F. Abbott,et al.  A Model of Spatial Map Formation in the Hippocampus of the Rat , 1999, Neural Computation.

[56]  Arild O. Gautestad,et al.  Intrinsic Scaling Complexity in Animal Dispersion and Abundance , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[57]  Donald M. Wilkie,et al.  Field observations of time-place behaviour in scavenging birds , 1996, Behavioural Processes.