An exploratory investigation of critical success factors in wireless field force automation projects

One manifestation of today’s globalization is a new type of work environment where employees who are living in different parts of the world regularly engage in collaborative activity. Because these workers are socialized in different cultural environments, an important research issue is how to understand workers behaviors and effectively manage in this global workplace were workers communicate on a daily basis but do not meet each other and may not even know the life styles of their team members. Based on an ethnographic analysis of GLOBALIS, a multinational firm in the financial sector with IT solution centers in the US, Ireland and India, this paper presents a conceptual model of how culture was impacting the behaviors of global teams at GLOBALIS. In this model the behaviors of globally team members is primarily governed by corporate norms, project requirements and workplace culture. National culture, which has been identified in cross-cultural research as a key factor in global work, is just one of many demographic variables like age, education, professional standards, inter-relationships among sites, etc. that impact workplace culture. Thus, this paper reinforces the current multi-faceted view of culture as a set of forces that impact values and behaviors and it also clarifies some of the clouded opinions on whether or how national culture differences impact today’s globally distributed work.

[1]  Sundeep Sahay,et al.  Managing cross-cultural issues in global software outsourcing , 2004, CACM.

[2]  Allan Bird,et al.  Beyond sophisticated stereotyping: Cultural sensemaking in context , 2000 .

[3]  H. Garfinkel Ethnomethodology's program , 2002 .

[4]  R. Brislin,et al.  Cultural Diversity in People's Understanding and Uses of Time , 2003 .

[5]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Synching or Sinking: Global Software Outsourcing Relationships , 2001, IEEE Softw..

[6]  R. Guha India After Gandhi: The History of the World's Largest Democracy , 2007 .

[7]  Richard W. Brislin,et al.  Intercultural Interactions: A Practical Guide , 1988 .

[8]  J. Daniel Couger,et al.  Commonalities in motivating environments for programmer/analysts in Austria, Israel, Singapore, and the U.S.A , 1990, Inf. Manag..

[9]  R. Likert “Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes, A” , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[10]  A. Laurent The cross-cultural puzzle of international human resource management , 1986 .

[11]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Workplace Studies: Recovering Work Practice and Informing System Design, Paul Luff, Jon Hindmarsh and Christian C. Heath (eds.) , 2000, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[12]  Erran Carmel,et al.  Offshoring Information Technology: Foreword , 2005 .

[13]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Information systems in organizations , 1983 .

[14]  G. Hofstede Culture′s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations , 2001 .

[15]  Mark Srite,et al.  Information technology and culture: Identifying fragmentary and holistic perspectives of culture , 2005, Inf. Organ..

[16]  John Symons,et al.  Virtually borderless: an examination of culture in virtual teaming , 2007 .

[17]  J. Orr,et al.  Talking About Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job. , 1997 .

[18]  Greg Borchers,et al.  The software engineering impacts of cultural factors on multi-cultural software development teams , 2003, 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, 2003. Proceedings..

[19]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[20]  Felix B. Tan,et al.  Beyond Models of National Culture in Information Systems Research , 2002, J. Glob. Inf. Manag..

[21]  James C. Sarros,et al.  Leadership and its impact on organizational culture , 2002 .

[22]  B. Gutek,et al.  Some time dimensions of work: Measurement of an underlying aspect of organization culture. , 1987 .

[23]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  Culture Surprises in Remote Software Development Teams , 2003, ACM Queue.

[24]  Audris Mockus,et al.  Distance, dependencies, and delay in a global collaboration , 2000, CSCW '00.

[25]  Catherine Durnell Cramton,et al.  Relationships among geographic dispersion, team processes, and effectiveness in software development work teams , 2005 .

[26]  E. Hall The Silent Language , 1959 .

[27]  Vipin Gupta,et al.  Understanding Leadership in Diverse Cultures: Implications of Project GLOBE for Leading International Ventures , 2004 .

[28]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Cross-Cultural Software Production and Use: A Structurational Analysis , 2002, MIS Q..

[29]  D. Wellman,et al.  Talking About Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job. , 1997 .

[30]  Ajay K. Manrai,et al.  Effects of cultural-context, gender, and acculturation on perceptions of work versus social/leisure time usage , 1995 .

[31]  Sue Newell,et al.  Dangerous liaisons? Component-based development and organizational subcultures , 2003, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[32]  John Mingers,et al.  Combining IS Research Methods: Towards a Pluralist Methodology , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[33]  A. S. M. Sajeev,et al.  Offshore outsourcing: the risk of keeping mum , 2007, CACM.