Evaluating collaborative planning methods supporting programme-based planning in natural resource management.

Programme-based Planning of Natural Resources (PBPNR) is an evolving planning frame for solving complex land use, environmental and forest management problems within hierarchically administrated funding and decision-making schemes. PBPNR acknowledges that an effective planning process requires the combined consideration of environmental, technological, economic and socio-political factors. To reach acceptability, commitment and operability, PBPNR processes need to foster collaboration and learning. For this study, an analysis of 43 collaborative planning methods was conducted to examine their potential to be applied within PBPNR. We present the approach of screening the applicability of methods for specific needs that may occur in PBPNR. The approach is based on a list of key criteria for the phases of a collaborative planning process: problem identification, problem modelling and problem solving. The features of each method were qualitatively assessed and peer-reviewed by a team of experts. Most of the methods are able to deal with qualitative data, support processes to increase transparency in planning and capture the preferences of the participating stakeholders. They also produce understandable results for the three phases. Contrarily, many methods do not offer features to handle uncertainty, nor do they satisfactorily stimulate creativity and innovation in the planning process. The results show that the overall applicability of the reviewed methods for the three planning phases varies according to a cluster analysis basing on the capabilities of the methods. Methods such as "Planning for Real", "Open Space" and "A'WOT" seem to be particularly promising for a broad range of planning situations.

[1]  Guillermo A. Mendoza,et al.  Multi-criteria decision analysis in natural resource management: A critical review of methods and new modelling paradigms , 2006 .

[2]  Ahti Salo,et al.  Rank inclusion in criteria hierarchies , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  R. Kingston,et al.  Participatory geographic information systems and public engagement within flood risk management , 2010 .

[4]  Steven E. Daniels,et al.  Decision-Making and Ecosystem-Based Management: Applying the Vroom-Yetton Model to Public Participation Strategy , 1996 .

[5]  Ke Te Le Mei Ru He Deng Yi Marketing management: analysis. planning. implementation and control , 2000 .

[6]  Annika Kangas,et al.  Mixing methods – assessment of potential benefits for natural resources planning , 2014 .

[7]  Ravi Prabhu,et al.  Adaptive collaborative management of community forests in Asia: experiences from Nepal, Indonesia and the Philippines. , 2007 .

[8]  A. Kangas,et al.  Social choice theory and its applications in sustainable forest management—a review , 2006 .

[9]  I. Turton,et al.  Web-based public participation geographical information systems: an aid to local environmental decision-making , 2000 .

[10]  R. Kingston Web-based PPGIS in the United Kingdom , 2002 .

[11]  J. W. Hauge,et al.  Multicriteria approval: application of approval voting concepts to MCDM problems , 1998 .

[12]  J. Borges,et al.  Addressing collaborative planning methods and tools in forest management , 2007 .

[13]  P. Healey Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies , 1997 .

[14]  T. L. Saaty A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , 1977 .

[15]  André L. Delbecq,et al.  A Group Process Model for Problem Identification and Program Planning , 1971 .

[16]  Sergio Pellegrinelli,et al.  Programme management: organising project-based change , 1997 .

[17]  Janet Mancini Billson,et al.  Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research , 1989 .

[18]  Laura Ferreira,et al.  A Comparison of Hierarchical Methods for Clustering Functional Data , 2009, Commun. Stat. Simul. Comput..

[19]  M. Chan,et al.  Stakeholder analysis for natural resource management in developing countries , 1995 .

[20]  P. G. Ellis,et al.  Handbook for Planning and Conducting Charrettes for High-Performance Projects: Second Edition , 2003 .

[21]  Steve Selin,et al.  Developing a collaborative model for environmental planning and management , 1995 .

[22]  P. Checkland Soft Systems Methodology: A Thirty Year Retrospective a , 2000 .

[23]  Richard N. Palmer,et al.  World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2010: Challenges of Change , 2010 .

[24]  Pekka Leskinen,et al.  A Spatial Approach to Participatory Planning in Forestry Decision Making , 2002 .

[25]  W. Edwards,et al.  Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research , 1986 .

[26]  Harri Ehtamo,et al.  Searching for joint gains in multi-party negotiations , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[27]  Philip Alford Open Space - a Collaborative Process for Facilitating Tourism IT Partnerships , 2008, ENTER.

[28]  Raimo P. Hämäläinen,et al.  Web-HIPRE - Global decision support by value tree and AHP analysis , 1999 .

[29]  R. Margerum,et al.  A Typology of Collaboration Efforts in Environmental Management , 2008, Environmental management.

[30]  C. Ansell,et al.  Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice , 2007 .

[31]  Edward C. Weeks,et al.  The Practice of Deliberative Democracy: Results from Four Large‐Scale Trials , 2000 .

[32]  Ewald Rametsteiner,et al.  Grounding international modes of governance into National Forest Programmes , 2002 .

[33]  R. Howarth,et al.  Discourse-based valuation of ecosystem services: establishing fair outcomes through group deliberation , 2002 .

[34]  J. Kacprzyk,et al.  Group decision making and consensus under fuzzy preferences and fuzzy majority , 1992 .

[35]  S. Sheppard,et al.  Using multi-criteria analysis and visualisation for sustainable forest management planning with stakeholder groups , 2005 .

[36]  Lynn A. Maguire,et al.  Understanding Participant Perspectives: Q-Methodology in National Forest Management , 1998 .

[37]  H. Saarikoski,et al.  Public participation in practice — Assessing public participation in the preparation of regional forest programs in Northern Finland , 2010 .

[38]  A. Diduck,et al.  An Assessment of Stakeholder Advisory Committees in Forest Management: Case Studies from Manitoba, Canada , 2006 .

[39]  H. Vacik,et al.  Mapping indicator models: From intuitive problem structuring to quantified decision-making in sustainable forest management , 2011 .

[40]  Michel Thiry,et al.  Combining value and project management into an effective programme management model , 2002 .

[41]  Harrison Owen Open Space Technology , 2011 .

[42]  F. Berkes,et al.  Adaptive co-management for social–ecological complexity , 2009 .

[43]  Mika Kautonen,et al.  Balancing Competitiveness and Cohesion in Regional Innovation Policy: The Case of Finland , 2012 .

[44]  Annika Kangas,et al.  Decision support systems in forest management: requirements from a participatory planning perspective , 2012, European Journal of Forest Research.

[45]  A. Whyte,et al.  Towards an evaluation framework for eParticipation , 2008 .

[46]  Daniel Weiner,et al.  Community participation and geographic information systems. , 2002 .

[47]  J. Farley,et al.  WICKED PROBLEMS , 2007 .

[48]  J. Innes Planning Theory's Emerging Paradigm: Communicative Action and Interactive Practice , 1995 .

[49]  Peggy Holman,et al.  The Change Handbook: Group Methods for Shaping the Future , 2007 .

[50]  R. Revans Action Learning: New Techniques for Management , 1980 .

[51]  T. Sager Communicative Planning Theory , 1994 .

[52]  Mikko Kurttila,et al.  Making use of MCDS methods in SWOT analysis—Lessons learnt in strategic natural resources management , 2012 .

[53]  C. Eden ON THE NATURE OF COGNITIVE MAPS , 1992 .

[54]  Manfred Enders Anleitung zum ganzheitlichen Denken und Handeln. Ein Brevier für Führungskräfte , 1991 .

[55]  John Bromley,et al.  Participatory modelling to support decision making in water management under uncertainty: two comparative case studies in the Guadiana river basin, Spain. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[56]  O. Gislerud,et al.  National forest programmes in a European context , 2002 .

[57]  J. Schipperijn,et al.  Tools for mapping social values of urban woodlands and other green areas , 2007 .

[58]  B. V. Mudgal,et al.  Soft systems methodology and integrated flood management: a study of the Adayar watershed, Chennai, India , 2013 .

[59]  H. Vacik,et al.  Problem structuring in participatory forest planning , 2013 .

[60]  Mikko Kurttila,et al.  Alueellisten metsäohjelmien kehittäminen toimintaympäristön näkökulmasta , 2009 .

[61]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  Participatory Modelling in Natural Resource Management: A Comparison of Four Case Studies , 2003 .

[62]  Igone Palacios-Agúndez,et al.  The Relevance of Local Participatory Scenario Planning for Ecosystem Management Policies in the Basque Country, Northern Spain , 2013 .

[63]  Mikko Kurttila,et al.  Utilizing the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in SWOT analysis — a hybrid method and its application to a forest-certification case ☆ , 2000 .

[64]  Eeva Primmer,et al.  Goals for public participation implied by sustainable development, and the preparatory process of the Finnish National Forest Programme , 2006 .

[65]  Vicki C. Pappas,et al.  Starting Off Right , 2003 .

[66]  Mikko Kurttila,et al.  Mesta: An internet-based decision-support application for participatory strategic-level natural resources planning , 2009 .

[67]  Ned Crosby,et al.  Citizens Juries: One Solution for Difficult Environmental Questions , 1995 .

[68]  T. Webler,et al.  What Is a Good Public Participation Process? Five Perspectives from the Public , 2001, Environmental management.

[69]  R. McLain,et al.  Adaptive management: Promises and pitfalls , 1996, Environmental management.

[70]  Gilbert Probst,et al.  Anleitung zum ganzheitlichen Denken und Handeln : ein Brevier für Führungskräfte , 1991 .

[71]  C. Folke,et al.  Adaptive Comanagement for Building Resilience in Social–Ecological Systems , 2004, Environmental management.

[72]  Linda Mayoux Participatory action learning system (PALS): Impact assessment for civil society development and grassroots-based advocacy in Anandi, India , 2005 .

[73]  Bruce Shindler,et al.  Trust, acceptance, and citizen–agency interactions after large fires: influences on planning processes , 2010 .

[74]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis - an integrated approach , 2001 .

[75]  Ninni Saarinen,et al.  Stakeholder perspectives about proper participation for Regional Forest Programmes in Finland , 2010 .

[76]  D. Unalan,et al.  Integrating cumulative impacts into strategic environmental decision-making: Tourism development in Belek, Turkey , 2013 .

[77]  V. Prewitt Working in the Cafe: Lessons in Group Dialogue. , 2011 .

[78]  Mark Shucksmith,et al.  Disintegrated Rural Development? Neo‐endogenous Rural Development, Planning and Place‐Shaping in Diffused Power Contexts , 2010 .

[79]  Raimo P. Hämäläinen,et al.  Decision Support by Interval SMART/SWING - Incorporating Imprecision in the SMART and SWING Methods , 2005, Decis. Sci..

[80]  Bernhard Wolfslehner,et al.  Harnessing Ecosystem Models and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for the Support of Forest Management , 2010, Environmental management.

[81]  Laura Zurita,et al.  Consensus conference method in environmental issues: relevance and strengths , 2006 .

[82]  Mark Lorie,et al.  Shared Vision Planning for Clean Water Act Permits: An Experiment in Colorado , 2010 .

[83]  Mareike Schoop,et al.  Negoisst: a negotiation support system for electronic business-to-business negotiations in e-commerce , 2003, Data Knowl. Eng..

[84]  T. L. Saaty,et al.  Decision making with dependence and feedback , 2001 .

[85]  Raimo P. Hämäläinen,et al.  Decision support by interval smart/swing , 2008 .