Towards the development of commonal product programs

Today many companies encounter the challenge of reducing internal variety by developing modular product families. Yet even more potential for reducing internal variety can be gained by even striving for carry-over across product families as industrial case studies showed. A holistic corporate product program strategy for reducing variety supports the identification and exploitation of this potential. How this strategy can be defined in specific corporate context is outlined in this paper. Based from the attributes of an ideal product program steps for definition of product structure strategies are proposed. The resulting development tasks need a deep understanding about a solution that suits corporate needs for differentiation and standardization best. This can be gained by analysis of tearing forces towards differentiation and standardization and comparison of possible solutions that enable commonality in different ways and by this have different effects. To support evaluation of these solutions a complexity cost estimation method is proposed complying with the lack of detailed information in the conceptual phase.

[1]  G. Gary Wang,et al.  Recent Advancements in Product Family Design and Platform-Based Product Development: A Literature Review , 2011, DAC 2011.

[2]  Dieter Krause,et al.  An Approach for reducing Variety across Product Families , 2012 .

[3]  Dieter Krause,et al.  Modulare Produktstrukturen methodisch umsetzen - Entwicklung von Standardumfängen und Integration von Erfahrungswissen , 2011 .

[4]  Ulf Harlou,et al.  Multi Product Development – New Models and Concepts , 2004 .

[5]  Mitchell M. Tseng,et al.  Fundamentals of product family architecture , 2000 .

[6]  Fabrizio Salvador,et al.  Toward a Product System Modularity Construct: Literature Review and Reconceptualization , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[7]  Dieter Krause,et al.  Design for Value Chain - An Integration of Value Chain Requirements into the Product Development Process , 2012 .

[8]  Wolfgang Beitz,et al.  Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach , 1984 .

[9]  Roger Jianxin Jiao,et al.  Architecture of Product Family: Fundamentals and Methodology , 2001, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[10]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  Commonality decisions in product family design , 2006 .

[11]  Dieter Krause,et al.  Methodical Support for the Development of Modular Product Families , 2011 .

[12]  Lars Hvam,et al.  Calculation of Complexity Costs - An Approach for Rationalizing a Product Program , 2012 .

[13]  Tormod Jensen,et al.  The Corporate Platform - a Model to Create a Product Program , 2006 .

[14]  Marc H. Meyer,et al.  The power of product platforms : building value and cost leadership , 1997 .

[15]  Ulrich Wilhelm Thonemann,et al.  Optimal Commonality in Component Design , 2000, Oper. Res..

[16]  Dieter Krause,et al.  An assessment of methodical approaches to support the development of modular product families , 2013 .

[17]  K. Ulrich,et al.  Planning for Product Platforms , 1998 .