Characterizing the operability limits of the HyShot II scramjet through RANS simulations

Experimental and flight data for hypersonic air-breathing vehicles are both difficult and extremely expensive to obtain, motivating the use of computational tools to enhance our understanding of the complex physics involved. One of the major difficulties in simulating this regime is the interaction between combustion and turbulence, both of which are intrinsically complex processes. This work represents a first attempt at addressing assumptions introduced by physical models representing the turbulent reacting flow on the resulting predictions of the scramjet performance. A combustion model for high-speed flows is introduced and tested for the HyShot II vehicle. A reduced order chemistry model is then derived to investigate the effect of certain chemistry modeling assumptions within the combustion model. These models are used to investigate the unstart of the engine due to thermal choking by increasing the fuel flow rate. It is shown that an abrupt change occurs where a normal shock forms and moves upstream accompanied by a large region of subsonic flow. Additionally scalar metrics are described which are used as early indicators of unstart, to formulate safe operating limits for the scramjet engine.

[1]  Andreas Mack,et al.  CFD Analysis of the HyShot Supersonic Combustion Flight Experiment Configuration , 2006 .

[2]  Ramana V. Grandhi,et al.  Quantification of Modeling Uncertainty in Aeroelastic Design , 2010 .

[3]  G. Iaccarino,et al.  Full system scramjet simulation , 2009 .

[4]  Michael K. Smart,et al.  Flight Data Analysis of the HyShot 2 Scramjet Flight Experiment , 2006 .

[5]  Gianluca Iaccarino,et al.  Full-system RANS of the HyShot II scramjet Part 1: Numerics and non-reactive simulations , 2010 .

[6]  Johan Steelant,et al.  Methodology of a combined ground based testing and numerical modelling analysis of supersonic combustion flow paths , 2010 .

[7]  Christer Fureby,et al.  CFD Analysis of the HyShot II scramjet combustor , 2011 .

[8]  Gianluca Iaccarino,et al.  Modeling Structural Uncertainties in Reynolds-Averaged Computations of Shock/Boundary Layer Interactions , 2011 .

[9]  P. Moin,et al.  Progress-variable approach for large-eddy simulation of non-premixed turbulent combustion , 2004, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[10]  Andreas Mack,et al.  Comparison of supersonic combustion tests with shock tunnels, flight and CFD , 2006 .

[11]  Johan Steelant,et al.  Ground Testing of the HyShot II Scramjet Configuration in HEG , 2008 .

[12]  V. S. Vaidhyanathan,et al.  Transport phenomena , 2005, Experientia.

[13]  R. Hanson,et al.  Experimental study and modeling of the reaction H + O2+ M → HO2+ M (M = Ar, N2, H2O) at elevated pressures and temperatures between 1050 and 1250 K , 2001 .

[14]  Heinz Pitsch,et al.  Flamelet-based modeling of auto-ignition with thermal inhomogeneities for application to HCCI engines , 2007 .

[15]  D. Sharp,et al.  QMU and Nuclear Weapons Certification What ’ s under the hood ? , 2022 .

[16]  Heinz Pitsch,et al.  Prediction of local extinction and re-ignition effects in non-premixed turbulent combustion using a flamelet/progress variable approach , 2005 .

[17]  Ramana V. Grandhi,et al.  Quantification of Modeling Uncertainty in Aeroelastic Design , 2010 .

[18]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Ideas underlying quantification of margins and uncertainties(QMU): a white paper. , 2006 .

[19]  Con J. Doolan,et al.  Quasi-one-dimensional modeling of hydrogen fuelled scramjet combustors , 2007 .

[20]  Sharath S. Girimaji,et al.  Assumed PDF turbulence-chemistry closure with temperature-composition correlations , 2003 .

[21]  Robert A. Baurle,et al.  Assumed and evolution probability density functions in supersonic turbulent combustion calculations , 1995 .

[22]  Andreas Mack,et al.  CFD Analysis of the HyShot II Scramjet Experiments in the HEG Shock Tunnel , 2008 .

[23]  Antonella Ingenito,et al.  LES of the HyShot scramjet combustor , 2010 .

[24]  Debasis Chakraborty,et al.  Evaluation of combustion models for high speed H2/air confined mixing layer using DNS data , 2000 .

[25]  Heinz Pitsch,et al.  Full-system RANS of the HyShot II scramjet Part 2: Reactive cases , 2010 .

[26]  T. Poinsot,et al.  Theoretical and numerical combustion , 2001 .

[27]  Katsuhiro Itoh,et al.  Numerical Simulation of a Scramjet Engine for JAXA's Flight Experiment Using Hyshot , 2005 .

[28]  Ronald K. Hanson,et al.  A shock tube study of the enthalpy of formation of OH , 2002 .

[29]  Russell R. Boyce,et al.  The HyShot Scramjet Flight Experiment - Flight Data and CFD Calculations Compared , 2003 .

[30]  Christer Fureby,et al.  LES of supersonic combustion in a scramjet engine model , 2007 .

[31]  Michael K. Smart,et al.  Flight Data Analysis of HyShot 2 , 2005 .

[32]  Vincent Terrapon Flamelet-based model for supersonic combustion , 2009 .

[33]  Gianluca Iaccarino,et al.  A QMU approach for characterizing the operability limits of air-breathing hypersonic vehicles , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[34]  Manfred Aigner,et al.  Numerical Investigation of the HyShot Supersonic Combustion Configuration , 2008 .