Assessing the Complexity of Dynamics in Enterprise Architecture Planning - Lessons from Chaos Theory

Enterprise Architecture (EA) models capture the fundamental elements of organizations and their relationships to servedocumentation, analysis and planning purposes. As the elements and their relationships change over time, EA planningbecomes increasingly complex. An analysis of existing methods shows that the complexity of dynamics is not sufficientlyaddressed. We argue that a sophisticated understanding of the complexity matter is prerequisite for EA planning methodconstruction. As Chaos Theory (CT) is deployed in natural and social sciences-as well as in different contexts of ISresearch-to describe and understand the behavior of complex systems over time, we use properties of CT to assess thecomplexity of dynamics in EA planning and to derive requirements for EA planning methods. Our findings emphasize theimportance of initial conditions of the architecture for EA planning and the need to harmonize planning granularities in orderto achieve predictable results.

[1]  Martin Bichler,et al.  Design science in information systems research , 2006, Wirtschaftsinf..

[2]  H. Schuster Deterministic chaos: An introduction , 1984 .

[3]  Samir Chatterjee,et al.  A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research , 2008 .

[4]  IEEE-SA Standards Board , 2000 .

[5]  Eetu I. Niemi,et al.  Enterprise Architecture Stakeholders - a Holistic View , 2007, AMCIS.

[6]  R. Thietart,et al.  Chaos Theory and Organization , 1995 .

[7]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[8]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[9]  Michael Rosemann,et al.  Critical Success Factors of Process Modeling for Enterprise Systems , 2001 .

[10]  Marc M. Lankhorst,et al.  Enterprise Architecture at Work - Modelling, Communication and Analysis, 2nd Edition , 2005, The Enterprise Engineering Series.

[11]  Robert Winter,et al.  Complexity Levels of Representing Dynamics in EA Planning , 2009, CIAO! / EOMAS.

[12]  E. Lorenz Deterministic nonperiodic flow , 1963 .

[13]  Robert Winter,et al.  Analysis and Application Scenarios of Enterprise Architecture: An Exploratory Study , 2006, 2006 10th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops (EDOCW'06).

[14]  Michael Tiemann,et al.  UPDATING THE ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING MODEL , 2006 .

[15]  Mirja Pulkkinen,et al.  Systemic Management of Architectural Decisions in Enterprise Architecture Planning. Four Dimensions and Three Abstraction Levels , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[16]  Philip W. Veasey,et al.  Use of enterprise architectures in managing strategic change , 2001, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[17]  Ulrich Frank,et al.  Towards a pluralistic conception of research methods in information systems research , 2006 .

[18]  Michael Rohloff,et al.  Framework and Reference for Architecture Design , 2008, AMCIS.

[19]  Gurpreet Dhillon,et al.  Chaos Theory as a Framework for Studying Information Systems , 2002, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[20]  Neil McBride,et al.  Chaos theory as a model for interpreting information systems in organizations , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[21]  Andrew H. Van de Ven,et al.  Learning the Innovation Journey: Order out of Chaos? , 1996 .

[22]  Stephan Murer,et al.  Managed Evolution Nachhaltige Weiterentwicklung großer Systeme , 2008 .

[23]  Sergey Samoilenko,et al.  Information systems fitness and risk in IS development: Insights and implications from chaos and complex systems theories , 2008, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[24]  Mathias Ekstedt,et al.  Enterprise Architecture : Models and Analyses for Information Systems Decision Making , 2007 .

[25]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions , 2008, Decis. Sci..

[26]  Florian Matthes,et al.  An Information Model for Landscape Management - Discussing Temporality Aspects , 2008, ICSOC Workshops.