The Perception of the National Traceability Platform among Small-Scale Tea Farmers in Typical Agricultural Areas in Central China

As one of the key technologies to ensure the safety of agricultural products, the national traceability platform is being widely promoted in China. However, it has not yet been widely adopted among farmers, especially small-scale farmers. Farmers are both producers and direct participants in the traceability of agricultural products. Their perception directly affects the effectiveness of the promotion of the national traceability platform. This study explores the perception of the national traceability platform among small-scale tea farmers in typical agricultural areas in central China. This research employed Q methodology, an approach that integrates both qualitative and quantitative data allowing individuals’ subjective understandings of a specific topic to be studied. The Q-sort procedure was performed in the field with 16 small-scale tea farmers. Next, Q-factor analyses were conducted using the Ken-Q analysis. The results show that small-scale tea farmers have different perceptions of the national traceability platform. Their main characteristics are active participation, resistant participation, risk aversion, and being driven by pressure. These four categories covered 52% of the perceived variance. Meanwhile, there is also a degree of internal consistency in the perception of small-scale tea farmers. Specifically, they are all concerned that participating in the national traceability platform may increase the cost and risk of cultivation and that it is difficult to obtain support from agricultural technicians. Therefore, understanding the perceptions of tea farmers of the national traceability platform is the premise for formulating effective promotion policies. Our research sheds light on the decision-making mechanisms for small-scale tea farmers to participate in national traceability platforms, further expanding the scope of current research on farmer behavior. This research has reference significance for promoting national traceability platforms in China and other countries around the world.

[1]  T. Del Giudice,et al.  Precision farming: what do Italian farmers really think? An application of the Q methodology , 2022, Agricultural Systems.

[2]  J. Moon,et al.  Analytical method development and risk characterisation of anthraquinone in various types of tea , 2022, Food Control.

[3]  Q. Liang,et al.  Effects of regulatory policy mixes on traceability adoption in wholesale markets: Food safety inspection and information disclosure , 2022, Food Policy.

[4]  Zhonggen Li,et al.  Concentrations, leachability, and health risks of mercury in green tea from major production areas in China. , 2022, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[5]  K. Lungu,et al.  Effectiveness of food traceability system of local beef and beef sausages in Malawi: A food safety perspective , 2022, Food Control.

[6]  H. Pham,et al.  Factors influencing intention to adopt ICT among intensive shrimp farmers , 2022, Aquaculture.

[7]  Seema Shukla,et al.  Food Traceability System in India , 2021, Measurement: Food.

[8]  S. Hosseinzadeh,et al.  Aflatoxin B1 and heavy metals in imported black tea to Bushehr, southern Iran; Contamination rate and risk assessment , 2021, Journal of Food Composition and Analysis.

[9]  N. Sasaki,et al.  Factors affecting farmers’ willingness to adopt a mobile app in the marketing of bamboo products , 2021 .

[10]  M. Purkait,et al.  Potential and sustainable utilization of tea waste: A review on present status and future trends , 2021 .

[11]  Annesha Chowdhury,et al.  Can tea support biodiversity with a few “nudges” in management: Evidence from tea growing landscapes around the world , 2021, Global Ecology and Conservation.

[12]  Y. Shao,et al.  Food safety and government regulation in rural China , 2021 .

[13]  Dehua Zhang,et al.  Foresight from the hometown of green tea in China: Tea farmers’ adoption of pro-green control technology for tea plant pests , 2021 .

[14]  Jing Ren,et al.  Driving mechanism for farmers to adopt improved agricultural systems in China: The case of rice-green manure crops rotation system , 2021 .

[15]  Xinzhong Zhang,et al.  Residue degradation and metabolism of spinetoram in tea: A growing, processing and brewing risk assessment , 2021, Food Control.

[16]  F. Kong,et al.  Rapid detection of paraquat residues in green tea using surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) coupled with gold nanostars , 2021 .

[17]  J. Harrison,et al.  Q methodology: An underutilised tool in pharmacy practice research. , 2021, Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP.

[18]  Tao Xia,et al.  Region identification of Xinyang Maojian tea using UHPLC-Q-TOF/MS-based metabolomics coupled with multivariate statistical analyses. , 2021, Journal of food science.

[19]  N. Deka,et al.  Economic sustainability of organic cultivation of Assam tea produced by small-scale growers , 2021 .

[20]  S. Hoffmann,et al.  Food safety: A policy history and introduction to avenues for economic research , 2021 .

[21]  Xueli Cao,et al.  Untargeted metabolomics coupled with chemometrics approach for Xinyang Maojian green tea with cultivar, elevation and processing variations. , 2021, Food chemistry.

[22]  C. Brannstrom,et al.  Using Q-methodology in environmental sustainability research: A bibliometric analysis and systematic review , 2021 .

[23]  Mingyue Li,et al.  Factors affecting the willingness of agricultural green production from the perspective of farmers' perceptions. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[24]  Dieter Fiems,et al.  Wireless sensor network for small-scale farming systems in southwest Iran: Application of Q-methodology to investigate farmers' perceptions , 2020, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[25]  Wei Lv,et al.  Similarity matching of food safety incidents in China: Aspects of rapid emergency response and food safety , 2020 .

[26]  B. Wee,et al.  Public frames in the road pricing debate: A Q-methodology study , 2020, Transport Policy.

[27]  Wenbin Wu,et al.  Food traceability system from governmental, corporate, and consumer perspectives in the European Union and China: A comparative review , 2020 .

[28]  Sarah A Mohan.  Risk aversion and certification: Evidence from the Nepali tea fields , 2020 .

[29]  A. Zinedine,et al.  Assessment of aflatoxin levels in herbal green tea available on the Moroccan market , 2020 .

[30]  Young-Min Lee,et al.  Investigating the Perception of the Elderly on the Future of Labour Market , 2020, International Journal of Trade and Global Markets.

[31]  Steven R. Brown.  Subjectivity in the Human Sciences , 2019, The Psychological Record.

[32]  P. Craufurd,et al.  Farmers' preferences for high-input agriculture supported by site-specific extension services: Evidence from a choice experiment in Nigeria , 2019, Agricultural systems.

[33]  Y. Mine,et al.  Recent Advances in the Understanding of the Health Benefits and Molecular Mechanisms Associated with Green Tea Polyphenols. , 2019, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[34]  S. Haq,et al.  Measuring environmental, economic, and social sustainability index of tea farms in Rize Province, Turkey , 2019, Environment, Development and Sustainability.

[35]  T. Liang,et al.  Does dual reduction in chemical fertilizer and pesticides improve nutrient loss and tea yield and quality? A pilot study in a green tea garden in Shaoxing, Zhejiang Province, China , 2018, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[36]  A. Rauf,et al.  Analysis of wheat farmers’ risk perceptions and attitudes: evidence from Punjab, Pakistan , 2018, Natural Hazards.

[37]  Aiora Zabala,et al.  When and how to use Q methodology to understand perspectives in conservation research , 2018, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[38]  R. Rezaei,et al.  Rural households' renewable energy usage intention in Iran: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology , 2018, Renewable Energy.

[39]  Jun-biao Zhang,et al.  The impact of psychological factors on farmers’ intentions to reuse agricultural biomass waste for carbon emission abatement , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[40]  David M. Lansing,et al.  Understanding stakeholder perspectives on agricultural best management practices and environmental change in the Chesapeake Bay: A Q methodology study , 2018 .

[41]  Dimitris Milakis,et al.  Implications of automated vehicles for accessibility and location choices: Evidence from an expert-based experiment , 2018 .

[42]  M. Moglia,et al.  Rice farming systems in Southern Lao PDR: Interpreting farmers’ agricultural production decisions using Q methodology , 2018 .

[43]  X. Yi,et al.  Effects of long-term nitrogen application on soil acidification and solution chemistry of a tea plantation in China , 2018 .

[44]  Wei Song,et al.  Predictors for e-government adoption: integrating TAM, TPB, trust and perceived risk , 2017, Electron. Libr..

[45]  Angelo Antonio D’Archivio,et al.  Geographical classification of Italian saffron (Crocus sativus L.) based on chemical constituents determined by high-performance liquid-chromatography and by using linear discriminant analysis. , 2016, Food chemistry.

[46]  Yeong Gug Kim,et al.  Consumer acceptance of a quick response (QR) code for the food traceability system: Application of an extended technology acceptance model (TAM). , 2016, Food research international.

[47]  J. Fairweather,et al.  Assessing the diversity of values and goals amongst Brazilian commercial-scale progressive beef farmers using Q-methodology , 2016 .

[48]  G. Shivakoti,et al.  Prospect of Fuelwood Plantations for Marginal Small Tea Farmers: A Case Study in Matara and Badulla Districts, Sri Lanka , 2015 .

[49]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  The Delphi technique in ecology and biological conservation: applications and guidelines , 2015 .

[50]  M. Inoue,et al.  Current Livelihood Condition of and Futurity of Tea Farming for Marginal Small Tea Farm Holders (MSTH) of Sri Lanka: Case Study From Badulla and Matara District , 2014 .

[51]  Jian Wang,et al.  Determination of pesticide residue transfer rates (percent) from dried tea leaves to brewed tea. , 2014, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[52]  S. Cash,et al.  Effects of water availability and pest pressures on tea (Camellia sinensis) growth and functional quality , 2013, AoB PLANTS.

[53]  A. House,et al.  Differences in the perceived role of the healthcare provider in delivering vascular health checks: a Q methodology study , 2013, BMC Family Practice.

[54]  Hung‐Hao Chang,et al.  Why is the food traceability system unsuccessful in Taiwan? Empirical evidence from a national survey of fruit and vegetable farmers , 2011 .

[55]  M. Marey-Pérez,et al.  Factors determining forest management by farmers in northwest Spain: Application of discriminant analysis , 2011 .

[56]  B. Welt,et al.  Traceability (Product Tracing) in Food Systems: An IFT Report Submitted to the FDA, Volume 1: Technical Aspects and Recommendations. , 2010, Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety.

[57]  I. Boz,et al.  Farmers’ perception of sustainable agriculture and its determinants: a case study in Kahramanmaras province of Turkey , 2009 .

[58]  Maarten Kroesen,et al.  Policy discourse, people's internal frames, and declared aircraft noise annoyance: an application of Q-methodology. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[59]  P. Stenner,et al.  Doing Q methodology: theory, method and interpretation , 2005 .

[60]  Carl A. Kallgren,et al.  A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct: When Norms Do and Do not Affect Behavior , 2000 .

[61]  L. Cordingley,et al.  Q methodology. , 1997, Nurse researcher.

[62]  C. Heckler.  Applied Discriminant Analysis , 1995 .

[63]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[64]  Jinyang Wang,et al.  Impact of organic fertilizer substitution and biochar amendment on net greenhouse gas budget in a tea plantation , 2022, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment.

[65]  He Xu,et al.  A Food anti-counterfeiting traceability system based on Blockchain and Internet of Things , 2021, ITQM.

[66]  L. Ruiz-Garcia,et al.  Indian perspective in food traceability: A review , 2017 .

[67]  Maureen McKinney.  The Method of Moderation for Solving Dynamic Stochastic Optimization Problems , 2012 .

[68]  Job van Exel,et al.  Q methodology: A sneak preview , 2005 .

[69]  Ted C. Schroeder,et al.  Australia's Livestock Identification Systems: Implications for United States Programs , 2004 .

[70]  Steven R. Brown.  Political Subjectivity: Applications of Q Methodology in Political Science. , 1980 .