The Use of Self-Ratings and Peer Ratings to Evaluate Performances of Student Group Members

The use of self- and peer ratings to evaluate individual performances in group settings in university classrooms has become accepted practice in higher education. This research-based article examines the relationship between self- and peer evaluations and discusses the effective use of both types of ratings when student groups are used in the classroom. Gender differences in both self- and peer evaluations are also examined.

[1]  David Antonioni,et al.  Designing an effective 360-degree appraisal feedback process , 1996 .

[2]  R. W. Haas,et al.  Using Peer Evaluations to Assess Individual Performances in Group Class Projects , 1996 .

[3]  Mary N. Vinson,et al.  The pros and cons of 360-degree feedback: making it work , 1996 .

[4]  Mary Jo Bitner,et al.  Paradigm Shifts in Business Education: Using Active Learning to Deliver Services Marketing Content , 1994 .

[5]  R. Saavedra,et al.  Peer evaluation in self-managing work groups. , 1993 .

[6]  Ted H. Shore.  Subtle gender bias in the assessment of managerial potential , 1992 .

[7]  Kevin R. Murphy,et al.  Is halo error a property of the rater, ratees, or the specific behaviors observed? , 1992 .

[8]  Brent M. Wren,et al.  The Emerging Role of Women in Industrial Selling: A Decade of Change , 1992 .

[9]  L. Jolliffe.  Approaches to Teaching Freedom of Expression: Industry's Team Approach to Classroom Projects , 1991 .

[10]  Carolyn F. Siegel,et al.  Taboo Topics: The Use of Controversial Issues for Student Research Projects , 1991 .

[11]  Judy Goldfinch,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF A PEER ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUE FOR OBTAINING INDIVIDUAL MARKS ON A GROUP PROJECT , 1990 .

[12]  Deborah G. . Ancona.  Outward Bound: Strategic for Team Survival in an Organization , 1990 .

[13]  S. Barley.  The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. , 1990, Administrative science quarterly.

[14]  Naresh K. Malhotra,et al.  The Project Method Approach: An Integrated Teaching Tool in Marketing Research , 1989 .

[15]  An Experiential Approach to Marketing Education , 1989 .

[16]  James L. Jordan.  Effects of Sex on Peer Ratings of U.S. Army Rotc Cadets , 1989 .

[17]  John Schaubroeck,et al.  A meta-analysis of self-supervisor, self-peer, and peer-supervisor ratings. , 1988 .

[18]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Generalizing From Laboratory to Field Settings. , 1987 .

[19]  E. E. Jones.  Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior , 1987 .

[20]  S. Ramocki.  Measured Effectiveness of Client-Sponsored Consulting Projects in the Marketing Research Course , 1987 .

[21]  Robert L. Heneman.  The relationship between supervisory ratings and results-oriented measures of performance: A meta-analysis. , 1986 .

[22]  C. Dommeyer.  A Comparison of the Individual Proposal and the Team Project in the Marketing Research Course , 1986 .

[23]  George C. Thornton,et al.  Effects of Gender on Self- and Supervisory Ratings , 1986 .

[24]  J. Henke.  Bringing Reality to the Introductory Marketing Student , 1985 .

[25]  Thomas D. Jensen,et al.  Client-Sponsored Projects: Bridging the Gap between Theory and Practice , 1985 .

[26]  M.Edward Goretsky.  Class Projects as a Form of Instruction , 1984 .

[27]  Nestor K. Ovalle,et al.  SELF‐APPRAISAL BASED UPON SUPERVISORY FEEDBACK , 1984 .

[28]  Andrew S. Imada,et al.  Social interaction, observation, and stereotypes as determinants of differentiation in peer ratings. , 1982 .

[29]  Stephen G. West,et al.  Validity of self-evaluation of ability: A review and meta-analysis , 1982 .

[30]  S. Carroll,et al.  Performance appraisal and review systems : the identification, measurement, and development of performance in organizations , 1982 .

[31]  M. A. Humphreys.  Client-Sponsored Projects in a Marketing Research Course , 1981 .

[32]  Gary P. Latham,et al.  Increasing productivity through performance appraisal , 1981 .

[33]  George C. Thornton,et al.  PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF SELF-APPRAISALS OF JOB PERFORMANCE , 1980 .

[34]  Robert A. Snyder,et al.  Sex Differences in Perceived Competence:: An Across Organizations Study , 1979 .

[35]  K. Deaux.  Self-evaluations of male and female managers , 1979 .

[36]  Robert L. Holzbach,et al.  Rater bias in performance ratings: Superior, self-, and peer ratings. , 1978 .

[37]  Ronald F. Bush,et al.  Women Contrasted to Men in the Industrial Salesforce: Job Satisfaction, Values, Role Clarity, Performance, and Propensity to Leave , 1978 .

[38]  K. Deaux,et al.  Attributing causes for one's own performance: The effects of sex, norms, and outcome , 1977 .

[39]  L. L. Cummings,et al.  Performance in Organizations: Determinants and Appraisal. , 1973 .

[40]  H. L. Henderson,et al.  Cartoon reaction scale with special reference to driving behavior. , 1966, Journal of Applied Psychology.

[41]  E Kay,et al.  Effects of threat in a performance appraisal interview. , 1965, The Journal of applied psychology.

[42]  W. Borg,et al.  Comparison between a Performance Test and Criteria of Instructor Effectiveness , 1956 .

[43]  F. E. Croxton,et al.  Applied General Statistics. , 1940 .