Land-use intensification reduces functional redundancy and response diversity in plant communities.

Ecosystem resilience depends on functional redundancy (the number of species contributing similarly to an ecosystem function) and response diversity (how functionally similar species respond differently to disturbance). Here, we explore how land-use change impacts these attributes in plant communities, using data from 18 land-use intensity gradients that represent five biomes and > 2800 species. We identify functional groups using multivariate analysis of plant traits which influence ecosystem processes. Functional redundancy is calculated as the species richness within each group, and response diversity as the multivariate within-group dispersion in response trait space, using traits that influence responses to disturbances. Meta-analysis across all datasets showed that land-use intensification significantly reduced both functional redundancy and response diversity, although specific relationships varied considerably among the different land-use gradients. These results indicate that intensified management of ecosystems for resource extraction can increase their vulnerability to future disturbances.

[1]  Hugo Fort,et al.  Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems: spatial early warnings and management procedures (Inspired in the physics of phase transitions) , 2010 .

[2]  P. Legendre,et al.  A distance-based framework for measuring functional diversity from multiple traits. , 2010, Ecology.

[3]  P. Legendre,et al.  Comparison of two plant functional approaches to evaluate natural restoration along an old-field – deciduous forest chronosequence , 2009 .

[4]  Fabrice DeClerck,et al.  Loss of functional diversity under land use intensification across multiple taxa. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[5]  C. Kremen,et al.  Are ecosystem services stabilized by differences among species? A test using crop pollination , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  Martin Hermy,et al.  The LEDA Traitbase: a database of life‐history traits of the Northwest European flora , 2008 .

[7]  D. Mouillot,et al.  New multidimensional functional diversity indices for a multifaceted framework in functional ecology. , 2008, Ecology.

[8]  Sandra Díaz,et al.  Scaling environmental change through the community‐level: a trait‐based response‐and‐effect framework for plants , 2008 .

[9]  Wilfried Thuiller,et al.  Plant-trait-based modeling assessment of ecosystem-service sensitivity to land-use change. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[10]  S. Lavorel,et al.  Incorporating plant functional diversity effects in ecosystem service assessments , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Harold A. Mooney,et al.  Long-term data reveal complex dynamics in grassland in relation to climate and disturbance , 2007 .

[12]  Owen L. Petchey,et al.  Low functional diversity and no redundancy in British avian assemblages. , 2007, The Journal of animal ecology.

[13]  D. B. Lindenmayer,et al.  Functional Richness and Relative Resilience of Bird Communities in Regions with Different Land Use Intensities , 2007, Ecosystems.

[14]  A. Hector,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem multifunctionality , 2007, Nature.

[15]  P. Balvanera,et al.  Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[16]  Owen L. Petchey,et al.  Functional diversity: back to basics and looking forward. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[17]  G. Daily,et al.  The diversity and conservation of plant reproductive and dispersal functional traits in human‐dominated tropical landscapes , 2006 .

[18]  D. Srivastava,et al.  Biodiversity-Ecosystem Function Research: Is It Relevant to Conservation? , 2005 .

[19]  G. Daily,et al.  SPECIES AND FUNCTIONAL DIVERSITY OF NATIVE AND HUMAN-DOMINATED PLANT COMMUNITIES , 2005 .

[20]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Global Consequences of Land Use , 2005, Science.

[21]  N. Williams,et al.  Extinction order and altered community structure rapidly disrupt ecosystem functioning. , 2005, Ecology letters.

[22]  B. Halpern,et al.  Low functional redundancy in coastal marine assemblages , 2005 .

[23]  F. Chapin,et al.  EFFECTS OF BIODIVERSITY ON ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING: A CONSENSUS OF CURRENT KNOWLEDGE , 2005 .

[24]  Beth A. Middleton,et al.  Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning: Synthesis and Perspectives , 2004 .

[25]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Regime Shifts, Resilience, and Biodiversity in Ecosystem Management , 2004 .

[26]  Ralf Schulze,et al.  Meta-Analysis: A Comparison of Approaches , 2004 .

[27]  R. DeFries,et al.  Land‐use choices: balancing human needs and ecosystem function , 2004 .

[28]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Response diversity, ecosystem change, and resilience , 2003 .

[29]  P. Reich,et al.  A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide , 2003 .

[30]  S. Naeem,et al.  Disentangling biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning: deriving solutions to a seemingly insurmountable problem , 2003 .

[31]  D. Bellwood,et al.  Limited functional redundancy in high diversity systems: resilience and ecosystem function on coral reefs , 2003 .

[32]  S. Lavorel,et al.  Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail , 2002 .

[33]  J. Rosenfeld,et al.  Functional redundancy in ecology and conservation , 2002 .

[34]  M. Loreau,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning : synthesis and perspectives , 2002 .

[35]  S. Díaz,et al.  Vive la différence: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes , 2001 .

[36]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning: Current Knowledge and Future Challenges , 2001, Science.

[37]  J Norberg,et al.  Phenotypic diversity and ecosystem functioning in changing environments: A theoretical framework , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  F. Chapin,et al.  Consequences of changing biodiversity , 2000, Nature.

[39]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. , 2000, Science.

[40]  P. Raven,et al.  Biodiversity: Extinction by numbers , 2000, Nature.

[41]  A. Kinzig,et al.  Original Articles: Plant Attribute Diversity, Resilience, and Ecosystem Function: The Nature and Significance of Dominant and Minor Species , 1999, Ecosystems.

[42]  M. Loreau,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in a fluctuating environment: the insurance hypothesis. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  Shahid Naeem,et al.  Species Redundancy and Ecosystem Reliability , 1998 .

[44]  F. Chapin,et al.  Biotic Control over the Functioning of Ecosystems , 1997 .

[45]  B. Walker.  Conserving Biological Diversity through Ecosystem Resilience , 1995 .

[46]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  The Future of Biodiversity , 1995, Science.

[47]  H. Mooney,et al.  Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function , 1994, Praktische Zahnmedizin Odonto-Stomatologie Pratique Practical Dental Medicine.

[48]  B. Walker.  Biodiversity and Ecological Redundancy , 1992 .