Expanding Ground-based Harvesting onto Steep Terrain: A Review

Timber harvesting on steep terrain has always been, and will remain, a challenge in terms of economic viability, safety and environmental performance. For almost a century motor-manual felling coupled with cable yarding has been the most appropriate harvesting system, but new technologies and innovations have led to machines and systems being developed that are modernising the way we operate on steep terrain. Specifically, they provide the opportunity for the mechanisation of operations with proven improvements in both safety and cost-effec tiveness. The additional development of cable-assist machines is potentially making a real step-change by expanding the operating range onto very steep slopes. This paper reviews these developments, the main engineering considerations of how cable-assist works, as well as the advances being made in terms of how such equipment is integrated into harvesting systems. The review also includes analyses of the operating guidelines that are either in place or being developed to help implement the systems.

[1]  Natascia Magagnotti,et al.  Relating safety, productivity and company type for motor-manual logging operations in the Italian Alps. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  Uwe Kiencke,et al.  Modeling of Rollover Sequences , 2000 .

[3]  FALLING EQUIPMENT,et al.  Harvesting Systems and Equipment in British Columbia , 1999 .

[4]  Edwin S. Miyata,et al.  Felling and bunching small timber on steep slopes. , 1981 .

[5]  Rick Mitchell,et al.  Impact of Slope on Productivity of a Self-levelling Processor , 2014 .

[6]  Hans Rudolf Heinimann,et al.  Perspectives on Central European Cable Yarding Systems , 2001 .

[7]  Karl Stampfer,et al.  Cable Extraction of Harvester-Felled Thinnings: An Austrian Case Study , 2013 .

[8]  Rick Mitchell,et al.  Bunching with a self-levelling feller-buncher on steep terrain for efficient yarder extraction , 2011 .

[9]  Karl Stampfer,et al.  A New Approach To Derive A Productivity Model for the Harvester "Valmet 911 Snake" , 2001 .

[10]  Sven-Ăke Axelsson,et al.  The Mechanization of Logging Operations in Sweden and its Effect on Occupational Safety and Health , 2013 .

[11]  Stephen W. Marshall,et al.  Factors affecting work-related injury among forestry workers: A review , 1993 .

[12]  Roy S. Larsen.  Cable logging systems , 1981 .

[13]  Mirko Medved,et al.  Fatal accidents in forestry in some European countries , 2007 .

[14]  Rainer Horn,et al.  Impact of modern forest vehicles on soil physical properties , 2007 .

[15]  Muhammad Alam,et al.  Self-Levelling Feller-Buncher Productivity Based on Lidar-Derived Slope , 2013 .

[16]  Karl Stampfer,et al.  Efficiency and ergonomic benefits of using radio controlled chokers in cable yarding. , 2010 .

[17]  Dennis P. Dykstra.  Production rates and costs for cable, balloon, and helicopter yarding systems in old-growth Douglas-fir , 1975 .

[18]  Jennifer L Bell,et al.  Changes in logging injury rates associated with use of feller-bunchers in West Virginia. , 2002, Journal of safety research.

[19]  Rien Visser,et al.  Effect of terrain steepness on machine slope when harvesting , 2015 .

[20]  Esther Cloutier,et al.  Mechanization and risk of occupational accidents in the logging industry , 1988 .

[21]  Ivar Samset,et al.  Winch and cable systems , 1985, Forestry Sciences.

[22]  Reiner Nollau,et al.  ARE FOREST OPERATIONS ON STEEP TERRAIN (AVERAGE OF 70% SLOPE INCLINATION) WITH WHEEL MOUNTED FORWARDERS WITHOUT SLIPPAGE POSSIBLE? , 2003 .

[23]  M J Sullman,et al.  Heart rate strain in cable hauler choker setters in New Zealand logging operations. , 2001, Applied ergonomics.

[24]  A.G.M. Hunter.  A review of research into machine stability on slopes , 1992 .

[25]  F. Frutig,et al.  Mechanisierte Holzernte in Hanglagen , 2007 .