Flexible Density Tempering Approaches for State Space Models with an Application to Factor Stochastic Volatility Models

Duan (2015) propose a tempering or annealing approach to Bayesian inference for time series state space models. In such models the likelihood is often analytically and computationally intractable. Their approach generalizes the annealed importance sampling (AIS) approach of Neal (2001) and DelMoral (2006) when the likelihood can be computed analytically. Annealing is a sequential Monte Carlo approach that moves a collection of parameters and latent state variables through a number of levels, with each level having its own target density, in such a way that it is easy to generate both the parameters and latent state variables at the initial level while the target density at the final level is the posterior density of interest. A critical component of the annealing or density tempering method is the Markov move component that is implemented at every stage of the annealing process. The Markov move component effectively runs a small number of Markov chain Monte Carlo iterations for each combination of parameters and latent variables so that they are better approximations to that level of the tempered target density. Duan (2015) used a pseudo marginal Metropolis-Hastings approach with the likelihood estimated unbiasedly in the Markov move component. One of the drawbacks of this approach, however, is that it is difficult to obtain good proposals when the parameter space is high dimensional, such as for a high dimensional factor stochastic volatility models. We propose using instead more flexible Markov move steps that are based on particle Gibbs and Hamiltonian Monte Carlo and demonstrate the proposed methods using a high dimensional stochastic volatility factor model. An estimate of the marginal likelihood is obtained as a byproduct of the estimation procedure.

[1]  David Gunawan,et al.  A flexible particle Markov chain Monte Carlo method , 2014, Stat. Comput..

[2]  R. Kohn,et al.  Efficiently Combining Pseudo Marginal and Particle Gibbs Sampling , 2018, 1804.04359.

[3]  A. Doucet,et al.  The correlated pseudomarginal method , 2015, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology).

[4]  Gregor Kastner,et al.  Efficient Bayesian Inference for Multivariate Factor Stochastic Volatility Models , 2016, 1602.08154.

[5]  Alexandros Beskos,et al.  On the convergence of adaptive sequential Monte Carlo methods , 2013, The Annals of Applied Probability.

[6]  J. Rosenthal,et al.  On the efficiency of pseudo-marginal random walk Metropolis algorithms , 2013, The Annals of Statistics.

[7]  Robert Kohn,et al.  On general sampling schemes for Particle Markov chain Monte Carlo methods , 2014 .

[8]  Robert Kohn,et al.  Flexible Particle Markov chain Monte Carlo methods with an application to a factor stochastic volatility model , 2014, 1401.1667.

[9]  Fredrik Lindsten,et al.  Particle gibbs with ancestor sampling , 2014, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[10]  Jin-Chuan Duan,et al.  Density-Tempered Marginalized Sequential Monte Carlo Samplers , 2013 .

[11]  Rodney W. Strachan,et al.  Invariant Inference and Efficient Computation in the Static Factor Model , 2013 .

[12]  Sumeetpal S. Singh,et al.  On particle Gibbs sampling , 2013, 1304.1887.

[13]  Ralph S. Silva,et al.  On Some Properties of Markov Chain Monte Carlo Simulation Methods Based on the Particle Filter , 2012 .

[14]  F. Lindsten,et al.  On the use of backward simulation in particle Markov chain Monte Carlo methods , 2011, 1110.2873.

[15]  Tobias Rydén,et al.  Rao-Blackwellization of Particle Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods Using Forward Filtering Backward Sampling , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[16]  Radford M. Neal MCMC Using Hamiltonian Dynamics , 2011, 1206.1901.

[17]  P. H. Garthwaite,et al.  Adaptive optimal scaling of Metropolis–Hastings algorithms using the Robbins–Monro process , 2010, 1006.3690.

[18]  A. Doucet,et al.  Particle Markov chain Monte Carlo methods , 2010 .

[19]  Mark J. Jensen,et al.  Bayesian Semiparametric Stochastic Volatility Modeling , 2008 .

[20]  Tony O’Hagan Bayes factors , 2006 .

[21]  N. Shephard,et al.  Analysis of high dimensional multivariate stochastic volatility models , 2006 .

[22]  N. Chopin Central limit theorem for sequential Monte Carlo methods and its application to Bayesian inference , 2004, math/0508594.

[23]  P. Moral Feynman-Kac Formulae: Genealogical and Interacting Particle Systems with Applications , 2004 .

[24]  A. Doucet,et al.  Monte Carlo Smoothing for Nonlinear Time Series , 2004, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[25]  P. Moral,et al.  Sequential Monte Carlo samplers , 2002, cond-mat/0212648.

[26]  S. Chib,et al.  Marginal Likelihood From the Metropolis–Hastings Output , 2001 .

[27]  Radford M. Neal Annealed importance sampling , 1998, Stat. Comput..

[28]  J. Geweke,et al.  Measuring the pricing error of the arbitrage pricing theory , 1996 .

[29]  N. Shephard,et al.  Stochastic Volatility: Likelihood Inference And Comparison With Arch Models , 1996 .