A dynamic trajectory control algorithm for improving the communication throughput and delay in UAV-aided networks

Recently, the UAS has been extensively exploited for data collection from remote and dangerous or inaccessible areas. While most of its existing applications have been directed toward surveillance and monitoring tasks, the UAS can play a significant role as a communication network facilitator. For example, the UAS may effectively extend communication capability to disaster-affected people (who have lost cellular and Internet communication infrastructures on the ground) by quickly constructing a communication relay system among a number of UAVs. However, the distance between the centers of trajectories of two neighboring UAVs, referred to as IUD, plays an important role in the communication delay and throughput. For instance, the communication delay increases rapidly while the throughput is degraded when the IUD increases. In order to address this issue, in this article, we propose a simple but effective dynamic trajectory control algorithm for UAVs. Our proposed algorithm considers that UAVs with queue occupancy above a threshold are experiencing congestion resulting in communication delay. To alleviate the congestion at UAVs, our proposal adjusts their center coordinates and also, if needed, the radius of their trajectory. The performance of our proposal is evaluated through computer-based simulations. In addition, we conduct several field experiments in order to verify the effectiveness of UAV-aided networks.

[1]  Christian Wietfeld,et al.  Leveraging public wireless communication infrastructures for UAV-based sensor networks , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security (HST).

[2]  Hiroyuki Tsuji,et al.  Measurement of TCP and UDP performance over UAS relay networks , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS).

[3]  Real time path planning for UAV based on Focused D , 2011, The Fourth International Workshop on Advanced Computational Intelligence.

[4]  H. Van Dyke Parunak,et al.  Demonstration of Digital Pheromone Swarming Control of Multiple Unmanned Air Vehicles , 2005 .

[5]  Moe Z. Win,et al.  Throughput per Pass for Data Aggregation from a Wireless Sensor Network via a UAV , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[6]  Eduard Santamaria,et al.  Rapid aerial mapping with multiple heterogeneous unmanned vehicles , 2013, ISCRAM.

[7]  Sofie Pollin,et al.  Micro aerial vehicle networks: an experimental analysis of challenges and opportunities , 2014, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[8]  Daniel Pack,et al.  Maximizing target detection under sunlight reflection on water surfaces with an autonomous unmanned aerial vehicle , 2013, 2013 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS).

[9]  J. Karl Hedrick,et al.  Autonomous UAV path planning and estimation , 2009, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[10]  Ryu Miura,et al.  An optimal data collection technique for improved utility in UAS-aided networks , 2014, IEEE INFOCOM 2014 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications.

[11]  Zhongxi Hou,et al.  The Shortest Path Planning for Manoeuvres of UAV , 2013 .

[12]  Cesare Stefanelli,et al.  Multiple-UAV coordination and communications in tactical edge networks , 2012, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[13]  Dipak Panigrahy Biographies , 2018, Cancer and Metastasis Reviews.

[14]  Gerhard P. Hancke,et al.  Industrial Wireless Sensor Networks: Challenges, Design Principles, and Technical Approaches , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.