Development of an audit instrument for nursing care plans in the patient record

Objectives—To develop, validate, and test the reliability of an audit instrument that measures the extent to which patient records describe important aspects of nursing care. Material—Twenty records from each of three hospital wards were collected and audited. The auditors were registered nurses with a knowledge of nursing documentation in accordance with the VIPS model—a model designed to structure nursing documentation. (VIPS is an acronym formed from the Swedish words for wellbeing, integrity, prevention, and security.) Methods—An audit instrument was developed by determining specific criteria to be met. The audit questions were aimed at revealing the content of the patient for nursing assessment, nursing diagnosis, planned interventions, and outcome. Each of the 60 records was reviewed by the three auditors independently and the reliability of the instrument was tested by calculating the inter-rater reliability coefficient. Content validity was tested by using an expert panel and calculating the content validity ratio. The criterion related validity was estimated by the correlation between the score of the Cat-ch-Ing instrument and the score of an earlier developed and used audit instrument. The results were then tested by using Pearson's correlation coefficient. Results—The new audit instrument, named Cat-ch-Ing, consists of 17 questions designed to judge the nursing documentation. Both quantity and quality variables are judged on a rating scale from zero to three, with a maximum score of 80. The inter-rater reliability coefficients were 0.98, 0.98, and 0.92, respectively for each group of 20 records, the content validity ratio ranged between 0.20 and 1.0 and the criterion related validity showed a significant correlation of r = 0.68 (p< 0.0001, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.76) between the two audit instruments. Conclusion—The Cat-ch-Ing instrument has proved to be a valid and reliable audit instrument for nursing records when the VIPS model is used as the basis of the documentation. (Quality in Health Care 2000;9:6–13)

[1]  J. Robinson,et al.  The use and limitations of Phaneuf's Nursing Audit. , 1992, Journal of advanced nursing.

[2]  M Ehnfors,et al.  Nursing care as documented in patient records. , 1993, Scandinavian journal of caring sciences.

[3]  A. Ehrenberg,et al.  Patient problems, needs, and nursing diagnoses in Swedish nursing home records. , 1999, Nursing diagnosis : ND : the official journal of the North American Nursing Diagnosis Association.

[4]  B. J. Winer,et al.  Statistical Principles in Experimental Design, 2nd Edition. , 1973 .

[5]  G. Ljunggren,et al.  Review of nursing documentation in nursing home wards - changes after intervention for individualized care. , 1999, Journal of advanced nursing.

[6]  Omvårdnadsdokumentation enligt VIPS modellen på sjukhem , 1998 .

[7]  G. Nordström,et al.  Nursing documentation in patient records. , 1996, Scandinavian journal of caring sciences.

[8]  M. Ventura.  Correlation between the quality patient care scale and the Phaneuf audit. , 1980, International journal of nursing studies.

[9]  Kathleen N. Lohr,et al.  Application to Clinical Practice , 1990 .

[10]  A. Donabedian,et al.  The quality of care. How can it be assessed? , 1988, JAMA.

[11]  C. Shaw.  Criterion based audit. , 1990, BMJ.

[12]  N. Edwards,et al.  Community health nursing audit: issues encountered during the selection and application of an audit instrument. , 1991, Public health nursing.

[13]  Marcus L. Walker,et al.  The Nursing Process: Assessing, Planning, Implementing, Evaluating , 1988 .

[14]  J. Sweeney.  Nursing Research—Principles and Methods , 1991 .

[15]  J. Gabbay,et al.  What did audit achieve? Lessons from preliminary evaluation of a year's medical audit. , 1990, BMJ.

[16]  June Clark,et al.  An International Classification for Nursing Practice , 1998 .

[17]  Evaluating the introduction of primary nursing: the use of a care plan audit. , 1997, Journal of clinical nursing.

[18]  C. H. Lawshe.  A QUANTITATIVE APPROACH TO CONTENT VALIDITY , 1975 .

[19]  G. Harvey.  An evaluation of approaches to assessing the quality of nursing care using (predetermined) quality assurance tools. , 1991, Journal of advanced nursing.

[20]  S J Grobe,et al.  The conceptual validity of a taxonomy of nursing interventions. , 1993, Journal of advanced nursing.

[21]  D A Heath.  Random review of hospital patient records. , 1990, British medical journal.

[22]  A. Ehrenberg,et al.  Nursing documentation in patient records: experience of the use of the VIPS model. , 1996, Journal of advanced nursing.

[23]  J. Griffiths,et al.  The wider implications of an audit of care plan documentation. , 1999, Journal of clinical nursing.

[24]  Helen Yura,et al.  The nursing process , 1988 .

[25]  M Hagland,et al.  Power to the patient. , 1996, Hospitals & health networks.

[26]  C. Frith.  Principles and methods , 1997 .

[27]  J. Ager,et al.  Quality patient care scale , 1976 .

[28]  M. Mashru,et al.  Interpractice audit of diagnosis and management of hypertension in primary care: educational intervention and review of medical records , 1997, BMJ.

[29]  Lynda Juall Carpenito‐Moyet,et al.  Nursing Diagnosis: Application to Clinical Practice 13/e , 1983 .

[30]  C. Patterson,et al.  Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. , 1995 .

[31]  P. Wicker.  Standards for records and record keeping. , 1993, The British journal of theatre nursing : NATNews : the official journal of the National Association of Theatre Nurses.

[32]  K. McLeish,et al.  Developing care plan documentation: an action research project. , 1995, Journal of nursing management.

[33]  M Ehnfors,et al.  Towards Basic Nursing Information in Patient Records , 1991, Vard i Norden.

[34]  C. Manfredi,et al.  Reliability and Validity of the Phaneuf Nursing Audit , 1986, Western journal of nursing research.

[35]  R. Taunton,et al.  Evaluation of a scale to assess nurses' attitudes toward written care plans. , 1989, Applied nursing research : ANR.