High-Resolution Sonars: What Resolution Do We Need for Target Recognition?

Target recognition in sonar imagery has long been an active research area in the maritime domain, especially in the mine-counter measure context. Recently it has received even more attention as new sensors with increased resolution have been developed; new threats to critical maritime assets and a new paradigm for target recognition based on autonomous platforms have emerged. With the recent introduction of Synthetic Aperture Sonar systems and high-frequency sonars, sonar resolution has dramatically increased and noise levels decreased. Sonar images are distance images but at high resolution they tend to appear visually as optical images. Traditionally algorithms have been developed specifically for imaging sonars because of their limited resolution and high noise levels. With high-resolution sonars, algorithms developed in the image processing field for natural images become applicable. However, the lack of large datasets has hampered the development of such algorithms. Here we present a fast and realistic sonar simulator enabling development and evaluation of such algorithms.We develop a classifier and then analyse its performances using our simulated synthetic sonar images. Finally, we discuss sensor resolution requirements to achieve effective classification of various targets and demonstrate that with high resolution sonars target highlight analysis is the key for target recognition.

[1]  Brian Calder Bayesian spatial models for SONAR image interpretation , 1997 .

[2]  Patrick Pérez,et al.  Hybrid Genetic Optimization and Statistical Model-Based Approach for the Classification of Shadow Shapes in Sonar Imagery , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[3]  A. Bellettini,et al.  Design and Experimental Results of a 300-kHz Synthetic Aperture Sonar Optimized for Shallow-Water Operations , 2009, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[4]  D. Lane,et al.  Superellipse Fitting for the Recovery and Classification of Mine-Like Shapes in Sidescan Sonar Images , 2008, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[5]  Yan Pailhas,et al.  Classification of bottom-set targets from wideband echo responses to bio- inspired sonar pulses , 2007 .

[6]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Fractal-Based Description of Natural Scenes , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[7]  S. Lovejoy Area-Perimeter Relation for Rain and Cloud Areas , 1982, Science.

[8]  E. Trucco,et al.  SimBIL: appearance-based simulation of burst-illumination laser sequences , 2008 .

[9]  D. R. Carmichael,et al.  Bayesian approach to object detection in sidescan sonar , 1998 .

[10]  R. Francois,et al.  Sound absorption based on ocean measurements: Part I: Pure water and magnesium sulfate contributions , 1982 .

[11]  V. Myers,et al.  Bounding the performance of sidescan sonar automatic target recognition algorithms using information theory , 2007 .

[12]  B. Ferguson,et al.  Generalized Framework for Real Aperture, Synthetic Aperture, and Tomographic Sonar Imaging , 2009, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[13]  Marc Pinto,et al.  Design of Synthetic Aperture Sonar Systems for High-Resolution Seabed Imaging (Tutorial Slides) , 2006 .

[14]  C. M. Ciany,et al.  Computer aided detection/computer aided classification and data fusion algorithms for automated detection and classification of underwater mines , 2000, OCEANS 2000 MTS/IEEE Conference and Exhibition. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37158).

[15]  M. P. Hayes,et al.  Simulation of multiple-receiver, broadband interferometric SAS imagery , 2003, Oceans 2003. Celebrating the Past ... Teaming Toward the Future (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37492).

[16]  Scott Reed,et al.  An automatic approach to the detection and extraction of mine features in sidescan sonar , 2003 .

[17]  J. Bell,et al.  Application of optical ray tracing techniques to the simulation of sonar images , 1997 .

[18]  Benoit B. Mandelbrot,et al.  Fractal Geometry of Nature , 1984 .

[19]  Robert J. Urick,et al.  Principles of underwater sound , 1975 .

[20]  Scott Reed,et al.  Model-based approach to the detection and classification of mines in sidescan sonar. , 2004, Applied optics.

[21]  I. Cohen,et al.  Anomaly subspace detection based on a multi-scale Markov random field model , 2004 .

[22]  G.R. Elston,et al.  Pseudospectral time-domain modeling of non-Rayleigh reverberation: synthesis and statistical analysis of a sidescan sonar image of sand ripples , 2004, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[23]  Allen Y. Yang,et al.  Robust Face Recognition via Sparse Representation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[24]  Yan Pailhas,et al.  Analysis and classification of broadband echoes using bio-inspired dolphin pulses. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Face recognition using eigenfaces , 1991, Proceedings. 1991 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[26]  I. Quidu,et al.  Mine classification using a hybrid set of descriptors , 2000, OCEANS 2000 MTS/IEEE Conference and Exhibition. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37158).

[27]  Jocelyn Chanussot,et al.  Higher-Order Statistics for the Detection of Small Objects in a Noisy Background Application on Sonar Imaging , 2007, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[28]  R. Voss Random Fractal Forgeries , 1985 .

[29]  Isabelle Quidu,et al.  Classification performances of Mine Hunting Sonar : Theory, practical results and operational applications , 2003 .

[30]  P. Burrough Fractal dimensions of landscapes and other environmental data , 1981, Nature.

[31]  Ronald T. Kessel Estimating the limitations that image resolution and contrast place on target recognition , 2002, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[32]  L Sirovich,et al.  Low-dimensional procedure for the characterization of human faces. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[33]  Yvan Petillot,et al.  Automated approach to classification of mine-like objects in sidescan sonar using highlight and shadow information , 2004 .

[34]  Gerald J. Dobeck,et al.  Adaptive three-dimensional range-crossrange-frequency filter processing string for sea mine classification in side scan sonar imagery , 1997, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[35]  Rama Chellappa,et al.  Discriminant Analysis for Recognition of Human Face Images (Invited Paper) , 1997, AVBPA.

[36]  Gerald J. Dobeck,et al.  Automated detection and classification of sea mines in sonar imagery , 1997, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[37]  E. O. Belcher,et al.  Beamforming and imaging with acoustic lenses in small, high-frequency sonars , 1999, Oceans '99. MTS/IEEE. Riding the Crest into the 21st Century. Conference and Exhibition. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.99CH37008).

[38]  Judith M. Bell A model for the simulation of sidescan sonar , 1995 .

[39]  B. R. Calder,et al.  Spatial stochastic models for seabed object detection , 1997, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[40]  I. Quidu,et al.  Mine classification based on raw sonar data: an approach combining Fourier descriptors, statistical models and genetic algorithms , 2000, OCEANS 2000 MTS/IEEE Conference and Exhibition. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37158).

[41]  Stuart Perry,et al.  Detection of small man-made objects in sector scan imagery using neural networks , 2001, MTS/IEEE Oceans 2001. An Ocean Odyssey. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.01CH37295).

[42]  Mahmood R. Azimi-Sadjadi,et al.  Adaptive underwater target classification with multi-aspect decision feedback , 2001, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.