Range-Wide Latitudinal and Elevational Temperature Gradients for the World's Terrestrial Birds: Implications under Global Climate Change

Species' geographical distributions are tracking latitudinal and elevational surface temperature gradients under global climate change. To evaluate the opportunities to track these gradients across space, we provide a first baseline assessment of the steepness of these gradients for the world's terrestrial birds. Within the breeding ranges of 9,014 bird species, we characterized the spatial gradients in temperature along latitude and elevation for all and a subset of bird species, respectively. We summarized these temperature gradients globally for threatened and non-threatened species and determined how their steepness varied based on species' geography (range size, shape, and orientation) and projected changes in temperature under climate change. Elevational temperature gradients were steepest for species in Africa, western North and South America, and central Asia and shallowest in Australasia, insular IndoMalaya, and the Neotropical lowlands. Latitudinal temperature gradients were steepest for extratropical species, especially in the Northern Hemisphere. Threatened species had shallower elevational gradients whereas latitudinal gradients differed little between threatened and non-threatened species. The strength of elevational gradients was positively correlated with projected changes in temperature. For latitudinal gradients, this relationship only held for extratropical species. The strength of latitudinal gradients was better predicted by species' geography, but primarily for extratropical species. Our findings suggest threatened species are associated with shallower elevational temperature gradients, whereas steep latitudinal gradients are most prevalent outside the tropics where fewer bird species occur year-round. Future modeling and mitigation efforts would benefit from the development of finer grain distributional data to ascertain how these gradients are structured within species' ranges, how and why these gradients vary among species, and the capacity of species to utilize these gradients under climate change.

[1]  Benjamin G Freeman,et al.  Rapid upslope shifts in New Guinean birds illustrate strong distributional responses of tropical montane species to global warming , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[3]  J. Travis,et al.  Dispersal and species’ responses to climate change , 2013 .

[4]  A. Manica,et al.  Mapping Global Diversity Patterns for Migratory Birds , 2013, PloS one.

[5]  T. Hovestadt,et al.  Predicting range shifts under global change: the balance between local adaptation and dispersal , 2013 .

[6]  J. Olden,et al.  Projected climate-driven faunal movement routes. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[7]  T. Benton,et al.  Red noise increases extinction risk during rapid climate change , 2013 .

[8]  H. Resit Akçakaya,et al.  Identifying the World's Most Climate Change Vulnerable Species: A Systematic Trait-Based Assessment of all Birds, Amphibians and Corals , 2013, PloS one.

[9]  Ranga B. Myneni,et al.  Temperature and vegetation seasonality diminishment over northern lands , 2013 .

[10]  T. Brereton,et al.  Range expansion through fragmented landscapes under a variable climate , 2013, Ecology letters.

[11]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  Global Latitudinal-Asymmetric Vegetation Growth Trends and Their Driving Mechanisms: 1982-2009 , 2013, Remote. Sens..

[12]  C. Graham,et al.  Intra-generic species richness and dispersal ability interact to determine geographic ranges of birds , 2013 .

[13]  C. Rahbek,et al.  PAPER Towards a more mechanistic understanding of traits and range sizes , 2013 .

[14]  Greta Bocedi,et al.  Projecting species’ range expansion dynamics: sources of systematic biases when scaling up patterns and processes , 2012 .

[15]  Boris Schröder,et al.  How to understand species’ niches and range dynamics: a demographic research agenda for biogeography , 2012 .

[16]  M. Kearney,et al.  Correlation and process in species distribution models: bridging a dichotomy , 2012 .

[17]  W. Kunin,et al.  The effect of spatial resolution on projected responses to climate warming , 2012 .

[18]  T. Brereton,et al.  Habitat associations of species show consistent but weak responses to climate , 2012, Biology Letters.

[19]  Jirˇí Reif,et al.  The role of species’ ecological traits in climatically driven altitudinal range shifts of central European birds , 2012 .

[20]  Richard G. Pearson,et al.  Immigrants and refugees: the importance of dispersal in mediating biotic attrition under climate change , 2012 .

[21]  Veerabhadran Ramanathan,et al.  Latitudinally asymmetric response of global surface temperature: Implications for regional climate change , 2012 .

[22]  P. Tiffin,et al.  Role of climate and competitors in limiting fitness across range edges of an annual plant. , 2012, Ecology.

[23]  Walter Jetz,et al.  Tracking of climatic niche boundaries under recent climate change. , 2012, The Journal of animal ecology.

[24]  Kimberly S. Sheldon,et al.  On a collision course: competition and dispersal differences create no-analogue communities and cause extinctions during climate change , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  Hugo Naya,et al.  Latitudinal Patterns in Rodent Metabolic Flexibility , 2012, The American Naturalist.

[26]  Miguel B. Araújo,et al.  Global patterns in the shape of species geographical ranges reveal range determinants , 2012 .

[27]  Richard Gomulkiewicz,et al.  Long-distance gene flow and adaptation of forest trees to rapid climate change , 2012, Ecology letters.

[28]  Walter Jetz,et al.  Integrating biodiversity distribution knowledge: toward a global map of life. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[29]  N. Pepin,et al.  On the use of weather data in ecological studies along altitudinal and latitudinal gradients , 2012 .

[30]  Graeme M. Buchanan,et al.  Identifying Priority Areas for Conservation: A Global Assessment for Forest-Dependent Birds , 2011, PloS one.

[31]  J. Terborgh,et al.  Elevational Ranges of Birds on a Tropical Montane Gradient Lag behind Warming Temperatures , 2011, PloS one.

[32]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  Assessing the threat to montane biodiversity from discordant shifts in temperature and precipitation in a changing climate. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[33]  D. Sax,et al.  Analysis of climate paths reveals potential limitations on species range shifts. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[34]  J. Rotenberry,et al.  Breeding success at the range margin of a desert species: implications for a climate-induced elevational shift , 2011 .

[35]  Werner A. Stahel,et al.  Sharpening Wald-type inference in robust regression for small samples , 2011, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[36]  M. Araújo,et al.  21st century climate change threatens mountain flora unequally across Europe , 2011 .

[37]  C. Körner,et al.  Elevational species shifts in a warmer climate are overestimated when based on weather station data , 2011, International journal of biometeorology.

[38]  J. Tewksbury,et al.  Do species' traits predict recent shifts at expanding range edges? , 2011, Ecology letters.

[39]  S. Strauss,et al.  Gene flow increases fitness at the warm edge of a species’ range , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  B. Huntley,et al.  Toward a Management Framework for Networks of Protected Areas in the Face of Climate Change , 2011, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[41]  Cameron S Gillies,et al.  Fine-scale movement decisions of tropical forest birds in a fragmented landscape. , 2011, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[42]  Michael S. Gaines,et al.  Experimental evaluation of bird movements in a fragmented Neotropical landscape , 2011 .

[43]  L. Joppa,et al.  Constraints to Species’ Elevational Range Shifts as Climate Changes , 2011, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[44]  B. Huntley,et al.  Habitat microclimates drive fine‐scale variation in extreme temperatures , 2011 .

[45]  Walter Jetz,et al.  Projected range contractions of montane biodiversity under global warming , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[46]  K. Dexter.  The influence of dispersal on macroecological patterns of Lesser Antillean birds , 2010 .

[47]  D. Levey,et al.  Squeezed at the top: Interspecific aggression may constrain elevational ranges in tropical birds. , 2010, Ecology.

[48]  C. Orme,et al.  The environmental limits to geographic range expansion in birds. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[49]  W. Jetz,et al.  Avian distributions under climate change: towards improved projections , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[50]  C. Field,et al.  The velocity of climate change , 2009, Nature.

[51]  Steven R. Beissinger,et al.  Birds track their Grinnellian niche through a century of climate change , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[52]  W. Jetz,et al.  Phenotypic population divergence in terrestrial vertebrates at macro scales. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[53]  S. Salinas,et al.  Latitudinal variation in lifespan within species is explained by the metabolic theory of ecology , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[54]  P. Thornton,et al.  Generating characteristic daily weather data using downscaled climate model data from the IPCC's fourth assessment , 2009 .

[55]  M. Zappa,et al.  Climate change and plant distribution: local models predict high‐elevation persistence , 2009 .

[56]  C. McCain.  Vertebrate range sizes indicate that mountains may be 'higher' in the tropics. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[57]  Brian Huntley,et al.  Projected impacts of climate change on a continent-wide protected area network. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[58]  A. Phillimore,et al.  Ecomorphological predictors of natal dispersal distances in birds. , 2009, The Journal of animal ecology.

[59]  A. Pitman,et al.  Why is the choice of future climate scenarios for species distribution modelling important? , 2008, Ecology letters.

[60]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  Global Warming, Elevational Range Shifts, and Lowland Biotic Attrition in the Wet Tropics , 2008, Science.

[61]  I. Lovette,et al.  Experimental evidence for extreme dispersal limitation in tropical forest birds. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[62]  Alison J. Stattersfield,et al.  Key conservation issues for migratory land- and waterbird species on the world's major flyways , 2008, Bird Conservation International.

[63]  M. Luoto,et al.  Disregarding topographical heterogeneity biases species turnover assessments based on bioclimatic models , 2008 .

[64]  B. A. Hawkins,et al.  Range maps and species richness patterns: errors of commission and estimates of uncertainty , 2007 .

[65]  Liana N. Joseph,et al.  See Blockindiscussions, Blockinstats, Blockinand Blockinauthor Blockinprofiles Blockinfor Blockinthis Blockinpublication Evolutionary Blockinresponses Blockinto Blockinclimate Blockinchange , 2022 .

[66]  Hans Tømmervik,et al.  Prediction of the distribution of Arctic‐nesting pink‐footed geese under a warmer climate scenario , 2007 .

[67]  Walter Jetz,et al.  Species richness, hotspots, and the scale dependence of range maps in ecology and conservation , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[68]  Alan Y. Chiang,et al.  Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction With R , 2007, Technometrics.

[69]  J. Canadell,et al.  Global and regional drivers of accelerating CO2 emissions , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[70]  C. Parmesan.  Ecological and Evolutionary Responses to Recent Climate Change , 2006 .

[71]  A. MØller,et al.  Dispersal and climate change: a case study of the Arctic tern Sterna paradisaea , 2006 .

[72]  I. Mokhov,et al.  Tropospheric lapse rate and its relation to surface temperature from reanalysis data , 2006 .

[73]  K. Böhning‐Gaese,et al.  Range Size: Disentangling Current Traits and Phylogenetic and Biogeographic Factors , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[74]  S. Wood.  Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R , 2006 .

[75]  Paul R. Martin,et al.  Are mountain passes higher in the tropics? Janzen's hypothesis revisited. , 2006, Integrative and comparative biology.

[76]  J. L. Parra,et al.  Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas , 2005 .

[77]  D. Winkler,et al.  The natal dispersal of tree swallows in a continuous mainland environment , 2005 .

[78]  J. Drake.  Population effects of increased climate variation , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[79]  A. Peterson,et al.  Ecological niches as stable distributional constraints on mammal species, with implications for Pleistocene extinctions and climate change projections for biodiversity , 2004 .

[80]  A. Watkinson,et al.  Climate change and dispersal. , 2004 .

[81]  K. Trenberth,et al.  Modern Global Climate Change , 2003, Science.

[82]  V. Muggeo.  Estimating regression models with unknown break‐points , 2003, Statistics in medicine.

[83]  M. Geber,et al.  Variation among populations of Clarkia Unguiculata (Onagraceae) along altitudinal and latitudinal gradients. , 1999, American journal of botany.

[84]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  The Lorenz curve: a graphical representation of evenness , 1998 .

[85]  Christine H. Müller,et al.  High Breakdown Point and High Efficiency , 1997 .

[86]  S. Menard.  Applied Logistic Regression Analysis , 1996 .

[87]  P. Bartlein,et al.  Global Changes During the Last 3 Million Years: Climatic Controls and Biotic Responses , 1992 .

[88]  V. Yohai.  HIGH BREAKDOWN-POINT AND HIGH EFFICIENCY ROBUST ESTIMATES FOR REGRESSION , 1987 .

[89]  R. Davies.  Hypothesis testing when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative , 1977 .

[90]  Miklos D. F . Udvardy,et al.  A classification of the biogeographical provinces of the world , 1975 .

[91]  D. Janzen.  Why Mountain Passes are Higher in the Tropics , 1967, The American Naturalist.