Development of regionalisation procedures using a multi-model approach for flow simulation in an ungauged catchment

Summary Flow simulation in ungauged catchments is presently regarded as one of the most challenging tasks in surface water hydrology. Many of the ungauged catchments are located in the headwaters of rivers in mountainous regions of the world having enormous potential for sustainable water resource development. However, due to inaccessibility, rugged and inhospitable terrain, and historical lack of foresight concerning the need to have these headwaters adequately gauged, their potential is not readily realizable. Many downstream sites also suffer from non-availability of site-specific data as even in countries having extensive networks of gauged stations data may not be available at sites where these are most needed. As predictive tools for water resources, water quality, natural hazard mitigation and water availability assessment are generally data-driven, the lack of adequate hydrometric records poses difficult problems for planners, engineers, managers, and stake-holders alike. In this study, a methodology is developed for flow simulation in ungauged catchments using a regionalisation and multi-model approach involving a suite of rainfall–runoff models and combination techniques. Daily observed hydrometeorological data for 12 French catchments are used for illustrating the procedures. Following a preliminary investigation of the regional homogeneity of that group of catchments, three regional flow simulation techniques are applied. Although all 12 catchments are gauged, initially each catchment is successively considered as being ungauged for the purpose of flow simulation in that catchment, their actual discharges being subsequently used for evaluating the performance of the flow estimation procedures for the catchment. The Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency index ( R 2 ) is used for assessing and ranking the relative performances of the regionalisation–model couples to identify the most appropriate couple for the region. The final step of applying that couple to a truly ungauged (13th) catchment in the region is described. Results are presented and conclusions drawn on the efficacy of the regional-multi-model approach. Of the couples considered, the pooling method of regionalisation coupled with the conceptual soil moisture accounting and routing (SMAR) model is deemed to be the best for simulating flow in an ungauged catchment in the region.

[1]  I. G. Littlewood.  Improved unit hydrograph identification for seven Welsh rivers: implications for estimating continuous streamflow at ungauged sites , 2003 .

[2]  S. Howarth,et al.  Relationships between dynamic response characteristics and physical descriptors of catchments in England and Wales , 1998 .

[3]  Robert J. Abrahart,et al.  Multi-model data fusion for hydrological forecasting , 2001 .

[4]  Asaad Y. Shamseldin,et al.  A non-linear combination of the forecasts of rainfall-runoff models by the first-order Takagi–Sugeno fuzzy system , 2001 .

[5]  Michio Sugeno,et al.  Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modeling and control , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[6]  Richard Aspinall,et al.  Modelling land use change with generalized linear models--a multi-model analysis of change between 1860 and 2000 in Gallatin Valley, Montana. , 2004, Journal of environmental management.

[7]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[8]  A. Shamseldin.  Application of a neural network technique to rainfall-runoff modelling , 1997 .

[9]  Nanée Chahinian,et al.  Large Sample Basin Experiments for Hydrological Model Parameterization: Results of the Model Parameter Experiment — MOPEX , 2006 .

[10]  R. Ferrier,et al.  Development and application of a distributed catchment‐scale hydrological model for the River Ythan, NE Scotland , 1998 .

[11]  R. Beverton,et al.  Institute of Hydrology , 1972, Nature.

[12]  A. Shamseldin,et al.  Methods for combining the outputs of different rainfall–runoff models , 1997 .

[13]  Kieran M. O'Connor,et al.  A simple non-linear rainfall-runoff model with a variable gain factor , 1994 .

[14]  R. K. Kachroo,et al.  River flow forecasting. Part 2. Algebraic development of linear modelling techniques , 1992 .

[15]  R. K. Kachroo,et al.  River flow forecasting. Part 5. Applications of a conceptual model , 1992 .

[16]  P. E. O'connell,et al.  An introduction to the European Hydrological System — Systeme Hydrologique Europeen, “SHE”, 1: History and philosophy of a physically-based, distributed modelling system , 1986 .

[17]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Regionalisation of catchment model parameters , 2004 .

[18]  András Bárdossy,et al.  Modeling of the effect of land use changes on the runoff generation of a river basin through parameter regionalization of a watershed model , 2004 .

[19]  P. E. O'connell,et al.  IAHS Decade on Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB), 2003–2012: Shaping an exciting future for the hydrological sciences , 2003 .

[20]  Asaad Y. Shamseldin,et al.  Structures and Performances of Five Rainfall-Runoff Models for Continuous River-Flow Simulation , 2002 .

[21]  J. Nash.  A unit hydrograph study, with particular reference to British catchments [Discussion] , 1960 .

[22]  A. Shamseldin,et al.  A real-time combination method for the outputs of different rainfall-runoff models , 1999 .

[23]  A. Lilly,et al.  Investigating the relationship between a soils classification and the spatial parameters of a conceptual catchment-scale hydrological model , 2001 .

[24]  G. Vandewiele,et al.  Monthly water balance of ungauged catchments obtained by geographical regionalization , 1995 .

[25]  Mitja Brilly,et al.  Regionalization in hydrology , 1990 .

[26]  L. Natale,et al.  Non-linear modelling of the rainfall-runoff transformation , 1992 .