Differentiation 2.0: Using the Tools of Technology to Meet the Needs of All Learners

This case study highlights the essential components of differentiating instruction to meet the needs of all students, including those most advanced, and English Language Learners by using a variety of technologies. Many teachers in the study had access to technology, but few received limited professional development. Roadblocks that many teachers encountered are identified with possible solutions for addressing those concerns. The recommendations provided for addressing concerns that classroom teachers face are (1) how to differentiate instruction for all learners, (2) how to learn and sustain growth in using the tools of technology in lesson planning and implementation, and (3) how to manage all of the various components so that chaos does not ensue and every students’ learning is maximized. A review of all of these issues can be beneficial to other teachers in heterogeneous classrooms who want to use technology as tool for differentiating instruction. Jennifer G. Beasley University of Arkansas, USA

[1]  Elliott Ostler,et al.  Robotics and Problem-Based Learning in STEM Formal Educational Environments , 2012 .

[2]  J. Pellegrino,et al.  Professional Development in Integrating Technology Into Teaching and Learning: Knowns, Unknowns, and Ways to Pursue Better Questions and Answers , 2007 .

[3]  Neil Anderson,et al.  e-PD: Blended Models of Sustaining Teacher Professional Development in Digital Literacies , 2004 .

[4]  Peter Axel Nielsen,et al.  A Vertical Approach to Knowledge Management: Codification and Personalization in Software Processes , 2011, Int. J. Hum. Cap. Inf. Technol. Prof..

[5]  M. Sapon-Shevin.  Schools Fit for All. , 2001 .

[6]  Carol Ann Tomlinson,et al.  Quality Curriculum and Instruction for Highly Able Students , 2005 .

[7]  Hannele Kerosuo,et al.  Development Curriculum for Knowledge-Based Organizations: Lessons from a Learning Network , 2013, Int. J. Knowl. Based Organ..

[8]  James A. Siders,et al.  Creating a Digital Ecosystem for the Gifted Education Classroom , 2012 .

[9]  Rob Oyung,et al.  Working Virtually: Challenges of Virtual Teams , 2005 .

[10]  Joan Mazur,et al.  3D Modeling in a High School Computer Visualization Class: Enacting a Productive, Distributed Social Learning Environment , 2013 .

[11]  Edmundo Tovar Caro,et al.  Identifying Technical Competences of IT Professionals: The Case of Software Engineers , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Cap. Inf. Technol. Prof..

[12]  Thamaraiselvan Natarajan,et al.  Facades of Attractive Employer in Indian IT Industry: Existing Employee Perspective , 2011, Int. J. Hum. Cap. Inf. Technol. Prof..

[13]  Jason Ravitz.  Introduction: Summarizing Findings and Looking Ahead to a New Generation of PBL Research , 2009 .

[14]  Sanjay Misra,et al.  Featuring CIO: Roles, Skills and Soft Skills , 2013, Int. J. Hum. Cap. Inf. Technol. Prof..

[15]  KalpićDamir,et al.  The Business Transformation Framework for Managers in Business Innovation Transformation Projects , 2015 .

[16]  Heejung An,et al.  The Incorporation of Geometer’s Sketchpad in a High School Geometry Curriculum , 2013 .

[17]  Ricardo Colomo-Palacios.  Professional Advancements and Management Trends in the IT Sector , 2012 .

[18]  Peggy A. Ertmer,et al.  Teacher value beliefs associated with using technology: Addressing professional and student needs , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[19]  Salaheldin Ismail Salaheldin,et al.  Utilization of Project Management Software in Qatari Government Organizations: A Field-Force Analysis , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Cap. Inf. Technol. Prof..