Transport diffusivities of fluids in nanopores by non-equilibrium molecular dynamics simulation

We present a method to study fluid transport through nanoporous materials using highly efficient non-equilibrium molecular dynamics simulations. A steady flow is induced by applying an external field to the fluid particles within a small slab of the simulation cell. The external field generates a density gradient between both sides of the porous material, which in turn triggers a convective flux through the porous medium. The heat dissipated by the fluid flow is released by a Gaussian thermostat applied to the wall particles. This method is effective for studying diffusivities in a slit pore as well as more natural, complex wall geometries. The dependence of the diffusive flux on the external field sheds light on the transport diffusivities and allows a direct calculation of effective diffusivities. Both pore and fluid particle interactions are represented by coarse-grained molecular models in order to present a proof-of-concept and to retain computational efficiency in the simulations. The application of the method is demonstrated in two different scenarios, namely the effective mass transport through a slit pore and the calculation of the effective self-diffusion through this system. The method allows for a distinction between diffusive and convective contributions of the mass transport.

[1]  S. Bhatia,et al.  Molecular transport in nanopores: a theoretical perspective. , 2011, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[2]  Keith E. Gubbins,et al.  Poiseuille flow of Lennard-Jones fluids in narrow slit pores , 2000 .

[3]  W. Bowen,et al.  Predictive modelling of nanofiltration: membrane specification and process optimisation☆ , 2002 .

[4]  Craig C. Martens,et al.  Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Salt Rejection in Model Surface-Modified Nanopores , 2010 .

[5]  Q. Cai,et al.  Effect of pore wall model on prediction of diffusion coefficients for graphitic slit pores. , 2008, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[6]  Debra J Searles,et al.  Wall mediated transport in confined spaces: exact theory for low density. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[7]  B. Edwards,et al.  On the relationship between Fickian diffusivities at the continuum and molecular levels. , 2005, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[8]  J. H. R. Clarke,et al.  A comparison of constant energy, constant temperature and constant pressure ensembles in molecular dynamics simulations of atomic liquids , 1984 .

[9]  Grant S. Heffelfinger,et al.  Diffusion in Lennard-Jones Fluids Using Dual Control Volume Grand Canonical Molecular Dynamics Simulation (DCV-GCMD) , 1994 .

[10]  E. A. Müller,et al.  Behavior of ethylene and ethane within single-walled carbon nanotubes. 1-Adsorption and equilibrium properties , 2009 .

[11]  Molecular simulation of adsorption and transport diffusion of model fluids in carbon nanotubes , 2002 .

[12]  A. Einstein.  Über die von der molekularkinetischen Theorie der Wärme geforderte Bewegung von in ruhenden Flüssigkeiten suspendierten Teilchen [AdP 17, 549 (1905)] , 2005, Annalen der Physik.

[13]  N. Nguyen,et al.  Nanofluidic devices and their applications. , 2008, Analytical chemistry.

[14]  Jörg Kärger,et al.  Diffusion in Zeolites and Other Microporous Solids , 1992 .

[15]  D. Nicholson.  The transport of adsorbate mixtures in porous materials: Basic equations for pores with simple geometry , 1997 .

[16]  H. C. Andersen,et al.  Role of Repulsive Forces in Determining the Equilibrium Structure of Simple Liquids , 1971 .

[17]  V. S. Vaidhyanathan,et al.  Transport phenomena , 2005, Experientia.

[18]  E. Maginn,et al.  Historical Perspective and Current Outlook for Molecular Dynamics As a Chemical Engineering Tool , 2010 .

[19]  N. Aluru,et al.  Spatial diffusion of water in carbon nanotubes: from fickian to ballistic motion. , 2011, Journal of Physical Chemistry B.

[20]  Doros N. Theodorou,et al.  Progress and Outlook in Monte Carlo Simulations , 2010 .

[21]  Gerhard Hummer,et al.  Water in nonpolar confinement: from nanotubes to proteins and beyond. , 2008, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[22]  K. Schulten,et al.  Pressure-induced water transport in membrane channels studied by molecular dynamics. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[23]  E. Wang,et al.  Nanostructured materials for water desalination , 2011, Nanotechnology.

[24]  O. Manero,et al.  Flow of linear molecules through a 4:1:4 contraction-expansion using non-equilibrium molecular dynamics: Extensional rheology and pressure drop , 2009 .

[25]  Combined Diffusive and Viscous Transport of Methane in a Carbon Slit Pore , 2000 .

[26]  Billy D. Todd,et al.  DEPARTURE FROM NAVIER-STOKES HYDRODYNAMICS IN CONFINED LIQUIDS , 1997 .

[27]  R. Snurr,et al.  Nonequilibrium molecular dynamics simulations of diffusion of binary mixtures containing short n-alkanes in faujasite , 2004 .

[28]  Joshua D. Moore,et al.  The role of molecular modeling in confined systems: impact and prospects. , 2011, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[29]  S. Bhatia,et al.  Modeling self-diffusion of simple fluids in nanopores. , 2011, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[30]  R. Kubo.  Statistical-Mechanical Theory of Irreversible Processes : I. General Theory and Simple Applications to Magnetic and Conduction Problems , 1957 .

[31]  Rajamani Krishna,et al.  Describing the Diffusion of Guest Molecules Inside Porous Structures , 2009 .

[32]  Edward L Cussler,et al.  Diffusion: Mass Transfer in Fluid Systems , 1984 .

[33]  C. Grigoropoulos,et al.  Fast Mass Transport Through Sub-2-Nanometer Carbon Nanotubes , 2006, Science.

[34]  Alexis T. Bell,et al.  Transport diffusivity of methane in silicalite from equilibrium and nonequilibrium simulations , 1993 .

[35]  M. LeVan,et al.  Mixture diffusion in nanoporous adsorbents: equivalence of Fickian and Maxwell-Stefan approaches. , 2008, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[36]  The Sorting Demon of Maxwell , 1879, Nature.

[37]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[38]  Hsueh-Chia Chang,et al.  A critical comparison of equilibrium, non-equilibrium and boundary-driven molecular dynamics techniques for studying transport in microporous materials , 2001 .

[39]  J. Kirkwood.  The statistical mechanical theory of irreversible processes , 1949 .

[40]  C. Brooks.  Computer simulation of liquids , 1989 .

[41]  Jessica R. Whitman,et al.  Thermodynamic driving force for diffusion: comparison between theory and simulation. , 2011, The Journal of chemical physics.

[42]  E. A. Müller,et al.  Behavior of ethylene and ethane within single-walled carbon nanotubes, 2: dynamical properties , 2009 .

[43]  Denis J. Evans,et al.  Non-Newtonian molecular dynamics , 1984 .

[44]  D. Sholl.  Understanding macroscopic diffusion of adsorbed molecules in crystalline nanoporous materials via atomistic simulations. , 2006, Accounts of chemical research.

[45]  R. Krishna,et al.  The Maxwell-Stefan approach to mass transfer , 1997 .

[46]  Hans Hasse,et al.  Comprehensive study of the vapour–liquid coexistence of the truncated and shifted Lennard–Jones fluid including planar and spherical interface properties , 2006 .

[47]  Dick Bedeaux,et al.  Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics for Engineers , 2010 .

[48]  Hans Hasse,et al.  Poiseuille flow of liquid methane in nanoscopic graphite channels by molecular dynamics simulation , 2009, 0911.5481.

[49]  Berend Smit,et al.  Understanding Molecular Simulation , 2001 .

[50]  S. Bhatia,et al.  Hydrodynamic origin of diffusion in nanopores. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[51]  Cracknell,et al.  Direct molecular dynamics simulation of flow down a chemical potential gradient in a slit-shaped micropore. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[52]  William Thomson.  Popular Lectures and Addresses: THE SORTING DEMON OF MAXWELL , 2011 .