Problem prescriptions in Sweden necessitating contact with the prescriber before dispensing.

BACKGROUND Pharmacists have an important role in detecting, preventing, and solving prescription problems, which if left unresolved, may pose a risk of harming the patient. OBJECTIVES The aim was to examine prescription problems detected at pharmacies in Sweden, where pharmacists consider it necessary to contact the prescribers for clarification, completion or correction of the prescriptions before dispensing, and to compare the intervention rates at public pharmacies at hospitals (PPHs) with those at city center pharmacies (CCPs). METHODS All attempts to contact the prescriber about a prescription problem were recorded by trained observers (pharmacy students). Analyses were made of overall distribution of problem prescriptions, including data from all 14 participating pharmacies, and a comparison between CCPs and PPHs with data from the 5 areas, each consisting of 1 CCP and 1 PPH (10 pharmacies). Chi-square-analyses were used to compare proportions, Spearman's rank-correlation coefficient was used to test correlation between recorded rates and dispensed volume, and Wilcoxon two-sample test was used to test differences between the CCPs and PPHs. P<.05 is regarded as statistically significant. RESULTS The pharmacists contacted the prescribers for 1% of all new prescriptions before dispensing. Errors that may compromise patient safety and medication outcome constituted almost 60% of the problems. However, there was an inverse correlation between the intervention rates and the pharmacy's dispensing volume. Significantly lower rates of problem prescriptions were recorded for women than for men. The highest rates were seen for prescriptions to patients younger than 15 years, and the rates decreased with increasing patient age. Pharmacists at PPHs contacted the prescribers about prescription problems twice as often as those at large CCPs. Pharmacists spent an average of 5 minutes on the telephone to solve the problem (median time), but 25% of the prescriptions took 10 minutes or more. CONCLUSIONS Computerized physician order entry (CPOE) and electronically transmitted prescriptions (ETP) can not only reduce the total rate of prescription problems, but also introduce new clinically important errors that may compromise patient safety and medication outcome. The prescription problem rates in the present study differed across prescriber groups and patient age and gender, and the inverse correlation to pharmacy size indicates that all problems are not revealed and corrected and may thus reach the patient. CPOE and ETP have been used extensively in Sweden for the past decade, but the present study indicates that there is still a potential and need for improvement for the vision of "no prescribing errors/problems will reach the patient" to come true.

[1]  B. Littenberg,et al.  Medication error reporting by community pharmacists in Vermont. , 2004, Journal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhA.

[2]  D. Bates,et al.  Outpatient prescribing errors and the impact of computerized prescribing , 2005, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[3]  S. Benrimoj,et al.  Clinical intervention rates in community pharmacy: a randomised trial of the effect of education and a professional allowance , 2003 .

[4]  D. Isacson,et al.  Nationwide Survey of Subjectively Reported Adverse Drug Reactions in Sweden , 2008, The Annals of pharmacotherapy.

[5]  Amanda J Ballentine,et al.  Prescription errors occur despite computerized prescriber order entry. , 2003, American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.

[6]  Jessica Fryckstedt,et al.  [Drug-related problems common in the emergency department of internal medicine. The cause of admission in almost every third patient according to quality follow-up]. , 2008, Lakartidningen.

[7]  P. Varkey,et al.  The effect of computerized physician-order entry on outpatient prescription errors. , 2007, Managed care interface.

[8]  G. Laekeman,et al.  Frequency and trends of interventions of prescriptions in Flemish community pharmacies , 2003, Pharmacy World and Science.

[9]  A. Granås,et al.  Community pharmacists' prescription intervention practices--exploring variations in practice in Norwegian pharmacies. , 2010, Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP.

[10]  M T Rupp,et al.  Prescribing Problems and Pharmacist Interventions in Community Practice , 1992, Medical care.

[11]  A. Egberts,et al.  Nature, frequency and determinants of prescription modifications in Dutch community pharmacies. , 2001, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[12]  Elsevier Sdol,et al.  Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy , 2009 .

[13]  P. Aspden,et al.  Preventing Medication Errors , 2007 .

[14]  K. Knapp,et al.  Community pharmacist interventions in a capitated pharmacy benefit contract. , 1998, American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.

[15]  M. Rupp,et al.  Effect of patient information on the quality of pharmacists' drug use review decisions. , 2000, Journal of the American Pharmaceutical Association.

[16]  Göran Petersson,et al.  Assessment of ePrescription quality: an observational study at three mail-order pharmacies , 2009, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[17]  B. Littenberg,et al.  A dictation system for reporting prescribing errors in community pharmacies , 2004 .

[18]  Amer A. Kaissi,et al.  The Influence of the Structure and Culture of Medical Group Practices on Prescription Drug Errors , 2005, Medical care.

[19]  Robyn Tamblyn,et al.  Association between licensure examination scores and practice in primary care. , 2002, JAMA.

[20]  Arie Oliven,et al.  Prevention of prescription errors by computerized, on-line surveillance of drug order entry , 2005, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[21]  R. Phillips,et al.  Medication errors reported by US family physicians and their office staff , 2008, Quality & Safety in Health Care.

[22]  Bengt Åstrand,et al.  ePrescribing : Studies in Pharmacoinformatics , 2007 .

[23]  R. Neville,et al.  A classification of prescription errors. , 1989, The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[24]  J Norcini,et al.  Association between licensing examination scores and resource use and quality of care in primary care practice. , 1998, JAMA.

[25]  Kuyper Ar Patient counseling detects prescription errors. , 1993 .

[26]  A. Localio,et al.  Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. , 2005, JAMA.

[27]  H. Chrystyn,et al.  Clinical pharmacy interventions by community pharmacists during the dispensing process. , 1999, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[28]  Anthony J Avery,et al.  A survey of prescription errors in general practice , 2001 .

[29]  C. Claesson,et al.  Prescription errors detected by Swedish pharmacists , 1995 .

[30]  A. Friedman,et al.  Medication errors in the outpatient setting: classification and root cause analysis. , 2007, Archives of surgery.

[31]  Göran Petersson,et al.  Detection of potential drug interactions – a model for a national pharmacy register , 2006, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

[32]  A. Egberts,et al.  Evaluation of the clinical value of pharmacists' modifications of prescription errors. , 2004, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[33]  Robert A Lowe,et al.  The effect of computer-assisted prescription writing on emergency department prescription errors. , 2002, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[34]  K. Johnell,et al.  The Relationship between Number of Drugs and Potential Drug-Drug Interactions in the Elderly , 2007, Drug safety.

[35]  R. Herings,et al.  Determinants of pharmacists' interventions linked to prescription processing , 2004, Pharmacy World and Science.