Re-citation Analysis: A Promising Method for Improving Citation Analysis for Research Evaluation, Knowledge Network Analysis, Knowledge Representation and Information Retrieval

Citation analysis is used in research evaluation exercises around the globe, directly affecting the lives of millions of researchers and the expenditure of billions of dollars. It is therefore crucial to seriously address the problems and limitations that plague it. Central amongst critiques of the common practice of citation analysis has long been that it treats all citations equally, be they crucial to the citing paper or perfunctory. Weighting citations by their value to the citing paper has long been proposed as a theoretically promising solution to this problem. Recitation analysis proposes to tune out the large percentage of perfunctory citations in a paper and tune in on crucial ones when performing citation analysis, by ignoring uni-citations (mentioned just once in a paper) and counting and analyzing only re-citations (used again and again in a citing paper). By focusing on core connections in knowledge networks, re-citation analysis can help research evaluation become more sensitive to the distinction between essential and perfunctory impact of research. It may benefit citation-link based knowledge representation and retrieval systems with improved precision by better capturing “aboutness” of articles, the essence of subject indexing in knowledge representation and retrieval, rather than merely providing “relatedness” information. Conference Topic Theory; Methods and techniques

[1]  Andrea Bergmann,et al.  Citation Indexing Its Theory And Application In Science Technology And Humanities , 2016 .

[2]  M. Moravcsik,et al.  Some Results on the Function and Quality of Citations , 1975 .

[3]  W. Shadish,et al.  Author Judgements about Works They Cite: Three Studies from Psychology Journals , 1995 .

[4]  H. Small.  A Co-Citation Model of a Scientific Specialty: A Longitudinal Study of Collagen Research , 1977 .

[5]  Gertrud Herlach,et al.  Can retrieval of information from citation indexes be simplified? Multiple mention of a reference as a characteristic of the link between cited and citing article , 1978, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[6]  Ying Ding,et al.  Popular and/or prestigious? Measures of scholarly esteem , 2010, Inf. Process. Manag..

[7]  T. Brooks.  Evidence of complex citer motivations , 1986, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[8]  Jonathan Furner,et al.  Scholarly communication and bibliometrics , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[9]  Bluma C. Peritz.  On the Objectives of Citation Analysis: Problems of Theory and Method , 1992 .

[10]  D. Edge.  Quantitative Measures of Communication in Science: A Critical Review , 1979, History of science; an annual review of literature, research and teaching.

[11]  Terrence A. Brooks,et al.  Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations , 1985, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[12]  Mengxiong Liu,et al.  Progress in Documentation the Complexities of citation Practice: a Review of citation studies , 1993, J. Documentation.

[13]  Peter Vinkler,et al.  A quasi-quantitative citation model , 1987, Scientometrics.

[14]  Ming Li,et al.  Counting citations in texts rather than reference lists to improve the accuracy of assessing scientific contribution , 2011, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[15]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  Improving the accuracy of co-citation clustering using full text , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[16]  Simone Teufel,et al.  Automatic classification of citation function , 2006, EMNLP.

[17]  D. Cases,et al.  How can we investigate citation behavior?: a study of reasons for citing literature in communication , 2000 .

[18]  Blaise Cronin,et al.  The citation process: The role and significance of citations in scientific communication , 1984 .

[19]  Daryl E. Chubin,et al.  Content Analysis of References: Adjunct or Alternative to Citation Counting? , 1975 .

[20]  Min Song,et al.  Content-based author co-citation analysis , 2014, J. Informetrics.

[21]  K. E. Tranøy,et al.  Norms of Inquiry: Rationality, Consistency Requirements and Normative Conflict , 1980 .

[22]  Ying Ding,et al.  The distribution of references across texts: Some implications for citation analysis , 2013, J. Informetrics.

[23]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  Market value and patent citations , 2005 .

[24]  David Dubin,et al.  The Most Influential Paper Gerard Salton Never Wrote , 2004, Libr. Trends.

[25]  Daniel Lemire,et al.  Measuring academic influence: Not all citations are equal , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[26]  Andreas Strotmann,et al.  Dimensions and uncertainties of author citation rankings: Lessons learned from frequency‐weighted in‐text citation counting , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[27]  Donald Owen Case,et al.  How can we investigate citation behavior? A study of reasons for citing literature in communication , 2000, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[28]  Henry Small,et al.  Cited Documents as Concept Symbols , 1978 .

[29]  B. C. Griffith.  Understanding Science , 1989 .