A fluence-convolution method to calculate radiation therapy dose distributions that incorporate random set-up error.

The International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements Report 62 (ICRU 1999) introduced the concept of expanding the clinical target volume (CTV) to form the planning target volume by a two-step process. The first step is adding a clinically definable internal margin, which produces an internal target volume that accounts for the size, shape and position of the CTV in relation to anatomical reference points. The second is the use of a set-up margin (SM) that incorporates the uncertainties of patient beam positioning, i.e. systematic and random set-up errors. We propose to replace the random set-up error component of the SM by explicitly incorporating the random set-up error into the dose-calculation model by convolving the incident photon beam fluence with a Gaussian set-up error kernel. This fluence-convolution method was implemented into a Monte Carlo (MC) based treatment-planning system. Also implemented for comparison purposes was a dose-matrix-convolution algorithm similar to that described by Leong (1987 Phys. Med. Biol. 32 327-34). Fluence and dose-matrix-convolution agree in homogeneous media. However, for the heterogeneous phantom calculations, discrepancies of up to 5% in the dose profiles were observed with a 0.4 cm set-up error value. Fluence-convolution mimics reality more closely, as dose perturbations at interfaces are correctly predicted (Wang et al 1999 Med. Phys. 26 2626-34, Sauer 1995 Med. Phys. 22 1685-90). Fluence-convolution effectively decouples the treatment beams from the patient. and more closely resembles the reality of particle fluence distributions for many individual beam-patient set-ups. However, dose-matrix-convolution reduces the random statistical noise in MC calculations. Fluence-convolution can easily be applied to convolution/superposition based dose-calculation algorithms.

[1]  M van Herk,et al.  Quantification and predictors of prostate position variability in 50 patients evaluated with multiple CT scans during conformal radiotherapy. , 1999, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[2]  C. Ma,et al.  BEAM: a Monte Carlo code to simulate radiotherapy treatment units. , 1995, Medical physics.

[3]  J. Leong,et al.  Implementation of random positioning error in computerised radiation treatment planning systems as a result of fractionation. , 1987, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  J A Antolak,et al.  Planning target volumes for radiotherapy: how much margin is needed? , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  Vijayakumar,et al.  Evaluation of changes in the location and shape of the prostate and rectum during a seven week course of conformal radiotherapy , 1993 .

[6]  K Lam,et al.  Measurement of prostate movement over the course of routine radiotherapy using implanted markers. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  T. Landberg,et al.  What margins should be added to the clinical target volume in radiotherapy treatment planning for lung cancer? , 1998, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[8]  P Kijewski,et al.  Analysis of prostate and seminal vesicle motion: implications for treatment planning. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  E. Larsen,et al.  A method for incorporating organ motion due to breathing into 3D dose calculations. , 1999, Medical physics.

[10]  J M Balter,et al.  Quantization of setup uncertainties in 3-D dose calculations. , 1999, Medical physics.

[11]  Paul J. Keall,et al.  Performance benchmarks of the MCV Monte Carlo system , 2000 .

[12]  A. Brahme,et al.  Calculation and application of point spread functions for treatment planning with high energy photon beams. , 1987, Acta oncologica.

[13]  O. Sauer Calculation of dose distributions in the vicinity of high-Z interfaces for photon beams. , 1995, Medical physics.

[14]  A L Boyer,et al.  Calculation of photon dose distributions in an inhomogeneous medium using convolutions. , 1986, Medical physics.

[15]  M van Herk,et al.  Target margins for random geometrical treatment uncertainties in conformal radiotherapy. , 1996, Medical physics.

[16]  R. Mohan,et al.  Differential pencil beam dose computation model for photons. , 1986, Medical physics.

[17]  R Mohan,et al.  A method of incorporating organ motion uncertainties into three-dimensional conformal treatment plans. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  J Pouliot,et al.  Electronic portal imaging device detection of radioopaque markers for the evaluation of prostate position during megavoltage irradiation: a clinical study. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  C. Coleman,et al.  Analysis of prostate and seminal vesicle motion , 1993 .

[20]  W A Beckham,et al.  Evaluation of the validity of a convolution method for incorporating tumour movement and set-up variations into the radiotherapy treatment planning system. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  J T Booth,et al.  Set-up error & organ motion uncertainty: a review. , 1999, Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine.

[22]  G J Kutcher,et al.  Variation in prostate position quantitation and implications for three-dimensional conformal treatment planning. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[23]  J. Battista,et al.  A convolution method of calculating dose for 15-MV x rays. , 1985, Medical physics.

[24]  P J Keall,et al.  A method to predict the effect of organ motion and set-up variations on treatment plans. , 1999, Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine.

[25]  M van Herk,et al.  A verification procedure to improve patient set-up accuracy using portal images. , 1993, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[26]  S. Zavgorodni Treatment planning algorithm corrections accounting for random setup uncertainties in fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. , 2000, Medical physics.

[27]  C. Chui,et al.  Experimental verification of a CT-based Monte Carlo dose-calculation method in heterogeneous phantoms. , 1999, Medical physics.