Compressive adaptive ghost imaging via sharing mechanism and fellow relationship.

For lower sampling rate and better imaging quality, a compressive adaptive ghost imaging is proposed by adopting the sharing mechanism and fellow relationship in the wavelet tree. The sharing mechanisms, including intrascale and interscale sharing mechanisms, and fellow relationship are excavated from the wavelet tree and utilized for sampling. The shared coefficients, which are part of the approximation subband, are localized according to the parent coefficients and sampled based on the interscale sharing mechanism and fellow relationship. The sampling rate can be reduced owing to the fact that some shared coefficients can be calculated by adopting the parent coefficients and the sampled sum of shared coefficients. According to the shared coefficients and parent coefficients, the proposed method predicts the positions of significant coefficients and samples them based on the intrascale sharing mechanism. The ghost image, reconstructed by the significant coefficients and the coarse image at the given largest scale, achieves better quality because the significant coefficients contain more detailed information. The simulations demonstrate that the proposed method improves the imaging quality at the same sampling rate and also achieves a lower sampling rate for the same imaging quality for different types of target object images in noise-free and noisy environments.

[1]  Ting Sun,et al.  Single-pixel imaging via compressive sampling , 2008, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[2]  Ling-An Wu,et al.  Lensless ghost imaging with sunlight. , 2014, Optics letters.

[3]  E. Tajahuerce,et al.  High-resolution adaptive imaging with a single photodiode , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[4]  Enrong Li,et al.  Application of multi-correlation-scale measurement matrices in ghost imaging via sparsity constraints. , 2014, Applied optics.

[5]  Liu Xuefeng,et al.  Ghost imaging based on Pearson correlation coefficients , 2015 .

[6]  Amir Averbuch,et al.  Adaptive Compressed Image Sensing Using Dictionaries , 2012, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[7]  M. Padgett,et al.  3D Computational Imaging with Single-Pixel Detectors , 2013, Science.

[8]  Ling-An Wu,et al.  Time-correspondence differential ghost imaging , 2013, 1301.4390.

[9]  Guihua Zeng,et al.  Polarization difference ghost imaging. , 2015, Applied optics.

[10]  Ingrid Daubechies,et al.  The wavelet transform, time-frequency localization and signal analysis , 1990, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[11]  J. Shapiro,et al.  Ghost imaging: from quantum to classical to computational , 2010 .

[12]  Shan Cheng,et al.  Time-like pion electromagnetic form factors in kT factorization with the next-to-leading-order twist-3 contribution , 2015, 1505.02909.

[13]  Jingang Zhong,et al.  Single-pixel imaging by means of Fourier spectrum acquisition , 2015, Nature Communications.

[14]  O. Katz,et al.  Ghost imaging with a single detector , 2008, 0812.2633.

[15]  Jeffrey H. Shapiro,et al.  Computational ghost imaging , 2008, 2009 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics and 2009 Conference on Quantum electronics and Laser Science Conference.

[16]  Wen Chen,et al.  Marked ghost imaging , 2014 .

[17]  E.J. Candes,et al.  An Introduction To Compressive Sampling , 2008, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[18]  Shensheng Han,et al.  Classical correlated imaging from the perspective of coherent-mode representation , 2007 .

[19]  Manfred Bayer,et al.  Compressive adaptive computational ghost imaging , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[20]  Wen Chen,et al.  Ghost imaging for three-dimensional optical security , 2013 .

[21]  S M Mahdi Khamoushi,et al.  Sinusoidal ghost imaging. , 2015, Optics letters.

[22]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[23]  J. Shapiro,et al.  Computational ghost imaging versus imaging laser radar for three-dimensional imaging , 2012, 1212.3253.

[24]  O. Katz,et al.  Compressive ghost imaging , 2009, 0905.0321.

[25]  R.G. Baraniuk,et al.  Compressive Sensing [Lecture Notes] , 2007, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[26]  Qionghai Dai,et al.  Patch-primitive driven compressive ghost imaging. , 2015, Optics express.

[27]  Qian Chen,et al.  Adaptive compressed sampling based on extended wavelet trees. , 2014, Applied optics.

[28]  Enrong Li,et al.  Multiple-input ghost imaging via sparsity constraints with thermal light , 2014 .

[29]  Ling-An Wu,et al.  Adaptive compressive ghost imaging based on wavelet trees and sparse representation. , 2014, Optics express.

[30]  Jinli Suo,et al.  Gerchberg-Saxton-like ghost imaging. , 2015, Optics express.