The systematic review process: an overview.

OVER THE YEARS, perianesthesia nursing has evolved from the care of postoperative surgical patients to the care of a wide variation of nonsurgical patients who have received anesthetic agents during procedures performed in other specialized departments such as endoscopy, interventional radiology, cardiac catherization laboratory, radiation therapy, and nuclear medicine, etc. In addition, once-simple outpatient procedures have evolved into more complex, advanced, and complicated procedures requiring a higher level of nursing care across the perianesthesia continuum.

[1]  G. Ingersoll.  Evidence-based nursing: what it is and what it isn't. , 2000, Nursing outlook.

[2]  K. Shojania,et al.  How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis , 2007, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[3]  John M Colford,et al.  Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: an illustrated, step-by-step guide. , 2004, The National medical journal of India.

[4]  D. Cook,et al.  Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[5]  Sherri Fenwick.  Is the language of research the real barrier? , 2005, The Journal of nursing administration.

[6]  R. Fink,et al.  Overcoming Barriers and Promoting the Use of Research in Practice , 2005, The Journal of nursing administration.

[7]  P. Windle.  Moving beyond the barriers for evidence-based practice implementation. , 2006, Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing.