Effects of gender in library and information science research: A case study of The Electronic Library

This study aims to showcase the effect of gender in the field of library and information science.,Research and review articles published from 2005 through 2014 in The Electronic Library, a prominent journal in the field of Library and Information Science, were examined from the perspective of authors’ gender. Influence of gender was assessed with respect to at individual and collaborative levels, quality in terms of citedness and citation count, and receipt of research grants.,There has been an increase in the proportion of male authors over the years with a resulting decline in female authors. Male authors are more productive as teachers, while females contribute more as working professionals or while they peruse their academic/research programmes. Though the productivity in collaborative works has increased in all gender combinations, it is more prominent when authors of opposite gender team up. No significant difference is observed in the number of national or international works produced in different collaborative authorship patterns. There is no difference in the number of male and female authors in male–female collaborative works. Works sponsored by grants are produced more frequently in groups comprising male–female or male–male members. No significant difference is observed in the number of cited or uncited works produced in different authorship patterns. The number of citations to works is independent of the nature of gender-wise authorship patterns.,The study examines the status of women in research, specifically in the field of library and information science. The findings of the study are based on the contribution of the authors involved with the journal, “The Electronic Library”. Readers are encouraged to expand the study by including authors that contribute to other library and information science journals.,The study is first of its kind to highlight the involvement and observe the influence of female authors in the field of library and information science research.

[1]  Kathleen J. Hancock,et al.  Women and Pre‐Tenure Scholarly Productivity in International Studies: An Investigation into the Leaky Career Pipeline , 2013 .

[2]  Peter van den Besselaar,et al.  Gender differences in scientific productivity: a persisting phenomenon? , 2012, Scientometrics.

[3]  Grant Lewison,et al.  Female researchers in Russia: have they become more visible? , 2011, Scientometrics.

[4]  Grant Lewison,et al.  The quantity and quality of female researchers: A bibliometric study of Iceland , 2001, Scientometrics.

[5]  J. Eloy,et al.  Gender differences in successful National Institutes of Health funding in ophthalmology. , 2014, Journal of surgical education.

[6]  P. Carr,et al.  Comparing the Status of Women and Men in Academic Medicine , 1993, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[7]  Katarina Prpic,et al.  Gender and productivity differentials in science , 2004, Scientometrics.

[8]  P. Carr,et al.  Relation of Family Responsibilities and Gender to the Productivity and Career Satisfaction of Medical Faculty , 1998, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[9]  Neil J. Gemmell,et al.  Gender Differences in Publication Output: Towards an Unbiased Metric of Research Performance , 2006, PloS one.

[10]  P. Carr,et al.  Relationships of gender and career motivation to medical faculty members' production of academic publications , 1998, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[11]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Sex differences in research funding, productivity and impact: an analysis of Québec university professors , 2011, Scientometrics.

[12]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  Gender differences in research collaboration , 2013, J. Informetrics.

[13]  J. S. Long,et al.  Rank Advancement in Academic Careers: Sex Differences and the Effects of Productivity. , 1993 .

[14]  Robert N. Broadus.  Toward a definition of “bibliometrics” , 1987, Scientometrics.

[15]  Hajar Sotudeh,et al.  Gender differences in science: the case of scientific productivity in Nano Science & Technology during 2005–2007 , 2013, Scientometrics.

[16]  A. Schroen,et al.  Women in Academic General Surgery , 2004, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[17]  Fredrik Niclas Piro,et al.  Are female researchers less cited? A large-scale study of Norwegian scientists , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[18]  M. Brink,et al.  Does Excellence have a Gender? A National Research Study on Recruitment and Selection Procedures for Professorial Appointments in the Netherlands , 2006 .

[19]  J. Jacobs,et al.  The academic life course, time pressures and gender inequality , 2004 .

[20]  Carolyn A. Copenheaver,et al.  Lack of Gender Bias in Citation Rates of Publications by Dendrochronologists: What is Unique about this Discipline? , 2010 .

[21]  Suresh Kumar,et al.  Scientometric profile of Indian scientific output in life sciences with a focus on the contributions of women scientists , 2013, Scientometrics.

[22]  B. M. Gupta,et al.  A comparision of productivity of male and female scientists of CSIR , 1999, Scientometrics.

[23]  G. Downey,et al.  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Gender-based Rejection Sensitivity and Academic Self-silencing in Women , 2022 .

[24]  J. S. Long,et al.  Measures of Sex Differences in Scientific Productivity , 1992 .

[25]  M. Nakhaie,et al.  Gender Differences in Publication among University Professors in Canada , 2008 .

[26]  Jonathan,et al.  THE PRODUCTIVITY PUZZLE : PERSISTENCE AND CHANGE IN PATTERNS OF PUBLICATION OF MEN AND WOMEN SCIENTISTS , 2004 .

[27]  J. Jill Suitor,et al.  Gender, household labor, and scholarly productivity among university professors , 2001 .

[28]  Daniel L. Chao,et al.  Characterization of a clinician-scientist cohort in ophthalmology: a demographic analysis of k grant awardees in ophthalmology. , 2013, Ophthalmology.

[29]  C. Wennerås,et al.  Nepotism and sexism in peer-review , 1997, Nature.

[30]  Yu Xie,et al.  Sex differences in research productivity : New evidence about an old puzzle , 1998 .

[31]  Rickard Danell,et al.  Career prospects for female university researchers have not improved , 2012, Scientometrics.

[32]  Kimberly Gladden Burke,et al.  Unraveling the Academic Productivity of Economists: The Opportunity Costs of Teaching and Service , 2006 .

[33]  Peter Willett,et al.  Brief communication: Gender differences in publication and citation counts in librarianship and information science research , 2006, J. Inf. Sci..

[34]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  A persistent problem , 2007, EMBO reports.

[35]  James P. Gander,et al.  FACULTY GENDER EFFECTS ON ACADEMIC RESEARCH AND TEACHING , 1999 .

[36]  K. Zou,et al.  Gender differences in research grant applications and funding outcomes for medical school faculty. , 2008, Journal of women's health.

[37]  Ángel Borrego,et al.  Scientific production in psychology: a gender analysis , 2012, Scientometrics.

[38]  Yuosre F. Badir,et al.  Examining the relationship of co-authorship network centrality and gender on academic research performance: the case of chemistry researchers in Pakistan , 2012, Scientometrics.

[39]  Ángel Borrego,et al.  Scientific output and impact of postdoctoral scientists: a gender perspective , 2010, Scientometrics.

[40]  R. Over.  Research productivity and impact of male and female psychologists. , 1982, The American psychologist.

[41]  J. Eloy,et al.  A gender-based comparison of academic rank and scholarly productivity in academic neurological surgery , 2014, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[42]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  Gender differences in research productivity: A bibliometric analysis of the Italian academic system , 2009, Scientometrics.

[43]  Laura B. Cardinal,et al.  The allocation of prestigious positions in organizational science: accumulative advantage, sponsored mobility, and contest mobility , 2005 .

[44]  M. Mason,et al.  Stay in the Game: Gender, Family Formation and Alternative Trajectories in the Academic Life Course , 2009 .

[45]  Päivi M. Tikka,et al.  Family‐friendly policies and gender bias in academia , 2008 .

[46]  S. Emans,et al.  Gender Differences in Research Grant Applications for Pediatric Residents , 2009, Pediatrics.

[47]  E. E. Baro,et al.  Gender and publication output of librarians in Edo and Delta State university libraries in Nigeria , 2009 .

[48]  Hildrun Kretschmer,et al.  Gender bias in journals of gender studies , 2012, Scientometrics.

[49]  Joy L. Johnson,et al.  Towards the inclusion of gender and sex in health research and funding: an institutional perspective. , 2012, Social science & medicine.

[50]  Sigal Alon,et al.  The female advantage in college academic achievements and horizontal sex segregation , 2011 .

[51]  Florou Giannoula.  Female University Staff in Greece and Turkey , 2014 .

[52]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  Gender differences in grant peer review: A meta-analysis , 2007, J. Informetrics.

[53]  Ivan Figueira,et al.  Is there a ‘gender gap’ in authorship of the main Brazilian psychiatric journals at the beginning of the 21st century? , 2010, Scientometrics.

[54]  Paul Nightingale,et al.  Peer review and the relevance gap: Ten suggestions for policy-makers , 2007 .